Elle

"mark" <masoud.bayan@gmail.com> wrote
Anyways I got a car-fax membership myself and ran the
report. It
showed car had two owners and first one registered car for
the
commercial use.
My question is, if a car is low mileage and also did not
have any
accident, but registered for commercial use or for example
was a
rental car, does it really matter price-wise or down the
road need
more maintenance?
----

Neither Kelly Blue Book nor Edmunds.com consider number of
owners or whether the car was used for rental or commercial
use.

I looked at a few dozen cars advertised on Craig's List in
my area in June and July. My opinion is that the cars with
fewer owners tended to be less abused. Also, multi-owner
cars are less likely in my estimation to have followed the
prescribed maintenance schedule, because short-term owners
might tend to sell just before a TB change etc. were due.

I felt that cars that were rental or commercial use were
more likely to have their oil changed regularly, for one. To
me, they are preferable, all other things equal.

ISTM that new car dealerships that also sell a few used cars
like one-owner cars for trade-ins in particular. These
one-owner cars re-sell for more and rightly so, IMO. I ended
up buying a one-owner car from a dealership for less than
the used dealer price but more than the highest "private
party" price, both as given at kbb.com . I was happy to pay
more to have a car that by all appearances was unmolested
and so likely to have no surprises.

jim beam

Siskuwihane wrote:
> On Aug 17, 6:52�pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> mark wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
>>> Is that a requirement?
>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
>> actually, it's not.
>>
>>> but some on here have to
>>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
>> like being a freeloader's not?
>>
>>
>>
>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
>
>
> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> user name, your point?

the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.


> The majority of my posts are not archived

eh? then use a decent news feed.

> and
> have I been on Tegger's "Readers Rides" for quit awhile so I didn't
> just pop in here today.
>
>
> What do you care if someone gets a Carfax run for free? What's so bad
> about saving money?
> I've gotten lots of free advice here and given what little Honda
> knowledge I know, I never had to pay for it and never asked

wanting a free ride on a subscription service is not the same as sharing
community knowledge. a pretty sad indictment if you can't recognize
that distinction.

Siskuwihane

On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Siskuwihane wrote:
> > On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>> mark wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi group,
> >>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
> >>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
> >>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
> >>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to payfor?
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> >>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> >>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
> >>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reportsto
> >>>>> some people on another news group, free.
> >>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
> >>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
> >>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
> >>> Is that a requirement?
> >>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
> >> actually, it's not.
>
> >>> but some on here have to
> >>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
> >> like being a freeloader's not?
>
> >>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
> >>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
> >>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
> >> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
>
> > I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> > user name, your point?
>
> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride..

The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
some percieved misdeed.
>
> > The majority of my posts are not archived
>
> eh? then use a decent news feed.

Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.

>
> > and
> > have I been on Tegger's "Readers Rides" for quit awhile so I didn't
> > just pop in here today.
>
> > What do you care if someone gets a Carfax run for free? What's so bad
> > about saving money?
> > I've gotten lots of free advice here and given what little Honda
> > knowledge I know, I never had to pay for it and never asked
>
> wanting a free ride on a subscription service is not the same as sharing
> community knowledge.

And asking for something that YOU don't have leaves you out of the
equation to start with but you feel it's your duty to police things.

It's a constant theme with you and Dan C, someone didn't ask a
question right, someone wasn't as appreciative as YOU thought they
should be, someone was getting free advice but never contributed,
someone didn't look in their owners manual...

The "03 Odyssey" thread is one of many examples, it has other posters
writing:

"It's unfortunate that you've encountered the less-than-polite trolls
that lurk in this newsgroup. These people are, by and large, rude
and
contentious. You are hardly the first to be treated this way."


>a pretty sad indictment if you can't recognize that distinction.- Hide quoted text -

And it's sad, but not surprising, that you don't see yourself as the
netcopping troll that others do. PKB.

jim beam

Siskuwihane wrote:
> On Aug 19, 12:11�am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> mark wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
>>>>> Is that a requirement?
>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
>>>> actually, it's not.
>>>>> but some on here have to
>>>>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
>>> user name, your point?
>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
>
> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
> some percieved misdeed.
>> �> The majority of my posts are not archived
>>
>> eh? �then use a decent news feed.
>
> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.

jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
something.



>
>>> and
>>> have I been on Tegger's "Readers Rides" for quit awhile so I didn't
>>> just pop in here today.
>>> �What do you care if someone gets a Carfax run for free? What's so bad
>>> about saving money?
>>> I've gotten lots of free advice here and given what little Honda
>>> knowledge I know, I never had to pay for it and never asked
>> wanting a free ride on a subscription service is not the same as sharing
>> community knowledge. �
>
> And asking for something that YOU don't have leaves you out of the
> equation to start with but you feel it's your duty to police things.
>
> It's a constant theme with you and Dan C, someone didn't ask a
> question right, someone wasn't as appreciative as YOU thought they
> should be, someone was getting free advice but never contributed,
> someone didn't look in their owners manual...
>
> The "03 Odyssey" thread is one of many examples, it has other posters
> writing:
>
> "It's unfortunate that you've encountered the less-than-polite trolls
> that lurk in this newsgroup. These people are, by and large, rude
> and
> contentious. You are hardly the first to be treated this way."

that won't help you - there is no solidarity in stupidity.


>
>
>> a pretty sad indictment if you can't recognize that distinction.- Hide quoted text -
>
> And it's sad, but not surprising, that you don't see yourself as the
> netcopping troll that others do. PKB.

so use a killfile and save yourself the pain of confronting reality...

Dan C

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:53 -0700, Siskuwihane wrote:

>>> The majority of my posts are not archived

>> eh? then use a decent news feed.

> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.

Wow. Talk about ignorance. I guess you've never heard of the Google
newsgroup archive, eh?

This should be interesting for you to check:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q...=2008&safe=off



--
"Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org

Siskuwihane

On Aug 19, 10:34 am, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 05:49:53 -0700, Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> The majority of my posts are not archived
> >> eh? then use a decent news feed.
> > Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>
> Wow. Talk about ignorance. I guess you've never heard of the Google
> newsgroup archive, eh?

Yeah, let's talk about ignorance since you are showing yours, eh?

Post through Google and you can go back and delete them later, months
later, thus REMOVING them from the Google archive. POOF, they're gone,
just like that.

>This should be interesting for you to check:
http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q...hl=en&as_epq=&...

Yeah, it's interesting in that about 1100 posts are missing because I
deleted them, nice try though.

Siskuwihane

On Aug 19, 9:26 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Siskuwihane wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> mark wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi group,
> >>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
> >>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
> >>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
> >>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> >>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> >>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
> >>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
> >>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
> >>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
> >>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
> >>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
> >>>>> Is that a requirement?
> >>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
> >>>> actually, it's not.
> >>>>> but some on here have to
> >>>>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
> >>>> like being a freeloader's not?
> >>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
> >>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
> >>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
> >>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to thisgroup?- Hide quoted text -
> >>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> >>> user name, your point?
> >> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
>
> > The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
> > some percieved misdeed.
> >> > The majority of my posts are not archived
>
> >> eh? then use a decent news feed.
>
> > Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>
> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
> something.
>

See my reply to your buddy and learn something.

jim beam

Siskuwihane wrote:
> On Aug 19, 9:26�am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
>>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
>>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
>>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
>>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
>>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
>>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
>>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
>>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
>>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
>>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
>>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
>>>>>> actually, it's not.
>>>>>>> but some on here have to
>>>>>>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
>>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
>>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
>>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
>>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
>>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
>>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
>>>>> user name, your point?
>>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
>>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
>>> some percieved misdeed.
>>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
>>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
>>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
>> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. �and that's saying
>> something.
>>
>
> See my reply to your buddy and learn something.

you don't understand. google is not the only usenet archive and
deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
accessible. fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
on "real" usenet servers all across the globe. maybe you should think
about that next time you post...

Siskuwihane

On Aug 19, 10:34 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Siskuwihane wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 9:26 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
> >>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
> >>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
> >>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had topay for?
> >>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> >>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> >>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
> >>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
> >>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
> >>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
> >>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
> >>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
> >>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
> >>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
> >>>>>> actually, it's not.
> >>>>>>> but some on here have to
> >>>>>>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
> >>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
> >>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
> >>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
> >>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
> >>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> >>>>> user name, your point?
> >>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a freeride.
> >>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
> >>> some percieved misdeed.
> >>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
> >>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
> >>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
> >> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
> >> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
> >> something.
>
> > See my reply to your buddy and learn something.
>
> you don't understand. google is not the only usenet archive and
> deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
> accessible. fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
> on "real" usenet servers all across the globe.

Yes, you are the only person who knows usenet and are a mission to
make others "understand".

No one gives a crap about those other archives, their retention rates
suck. That's why your cackling crow sidekick went straight for
Google, as expected.

> maybe you should think about that next time you post...- Hide quoted text -

Don't have to, I'm not netcopping and indescrimately jumping on others
for percieved net infractions.

Go ahead and continue if you must (and you will because that's what
netcops and trolls do).

jim beam

Siskuwihane wrote:
> On Aug 19, 10:34�pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>> On Aug 19, 9:26 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
>>>>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
>>>>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
>>>>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
>>>>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
>>>>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
>>>>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free report for
>>>>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
>>>>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
>>>>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
>>>>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
>>>>>>>> actually, it's not.
>>>>>>>>> but some on here have to
>>>>>>>>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
>>>>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
>>>>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
>>>>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
>>>>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
>>>>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
>>>>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
>>>>>>> user name, your point?
>>>>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
>>>>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
>>>>> some percieved misdeed.
>>>>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
>>>>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
>>>>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
>>>> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
>>>> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
>>>> something.
>>> See my reply to your buddy and learn something.
>> you don't understand. �google is not the only usenet archive and
>> deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
>> accessible. �fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
>> on "real" usenet servers all across the globe.
>
> Yes, you are the only person who knows usenet and are a mission to
> make others "understand".
>
> No one gives a crap about those other archives, their retention rates
> suck.

no so - some free servers don't retain long, but others are great archives.


> That's why your cackling crow sidekick went straight for
> Google, as expected.

no, you were the one crowing about "deleting" your posts. i simply
pointed out that you didn't understand the reality of your actions.



>
>> �maybe you should think about that next time you post...- Hide quoted text -
>
> Don't have to, I'm not netcopping and indescrimately jumping on others
> for percieved net infractions.

eh? suddenly, you're the victim of your own argument but it's someone
else's fault? that's stupid.

>
> Go ahead and continue if you must (and you will because that's what
> netcops and trolls do).

go ahead and disassociate yourself from your own problems there big guy!

Siskuwihane

On Aug 20, 9:33 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> Siskuwihane wrote:
> > On Aug 19, 10:34 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>> On Aug 19, 9:26 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>> On Aug 19, 12:11 am, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Aug 17, 6:52 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Siskuwihane wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Aug 16, 12:04 pm, jim beam <spamvor...@bad.example.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 15, 8:50 pm, Dan C <youmustbejok...@lan.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:59:03 -0700, mark wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi group,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I am buying a Honda CR-V EXL 2007 and really appreciate if someone can
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> kindly provide me a car-fax report for it.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Then pay for it yourself, dirtbag.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Why would anyone give you something for free, that they had to pay for?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me".
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Usenet Improvement Project:http://improve-usenet.org
> >>>>>>>>>>> It is very disappointing to see such a rude people in this forum.
> >>>>>>>>>>> 3 years ago when I had 10 car-fax reports, gave a couple of reports to
> >>>>>>>>>>> some people on another news group, free.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Why when someone who has already paid and can get free reportfor
> >>>>>>>>>>> others, don't this? except someone mean like you won't do that.
> >>>>>>>>>> so what exactly have you contributed to this group???
> >>>>>>>>> Is that a requirement?
> >>>>>>>>> It's every common to run a carfax for others
> >>>>>>>> actually, it's not.
> >>>>>>>>> but some on here have to
> >>>>>>>>> act like total ********* whenever it's requested.
> >>>>>>>> like being a freeloader's not?
> >>>>>>>>> I doubt anyone jumping on those asking even have a current Carfax
> >>>>>>>>> subscription to start with, but they want to get all bent out of shape
> >>>>>>>>> over something that doesn't even concern them.
> >>>>>>>> so, let's go back a step - what exactly have you contributed to this group?- Hide quoted text -
> >>>>>>> I've been in here for about 5 years now under this and another, former
> >>>>>>> user name, your point?
> >>>>>> the point, since you missed it, is that freeloaders don't get a free ride.
> >>>>> The point you missed is you and Dan C are always jumping someone about
> >>>>> some percieved misdeed.
> >>>>>>> The majority of my posts are not archived
> >>>>>> eh? then use a decent news feed.
> >>>>> Eh? I delete them myself, has nothing to do with what newsfeed I use.
> >>>> jeepers, that's one of the dumbest statements of fundamental
> >>>> misunderstanding i've ever ever read on usenet. and that's saying
> >>>> something.
> >>> See my reply to your buddy and learn something.
> >> you don't understand. google is not the only usenet archive and
> >> deletion from google's public database doesn't mean it's still not
> >> accessible. fact is, your posting activities are most definitely still
> >> on "real" usenet servers all across the globe.
>
> > Yes, you are the only person who knows usenet and are a mission to
> > make others "understand".
>
> > No one gives a crap about those other archives, their retention rates
> > suck.
>
> no so - some free servers don't retain long, but others are great archives.
>
> > That's why your cackling crow sidekick went straight for
> > Google, as expected.
>
> no, you were the one crowing about "deleting" your posts. i simply
> pointed out that you didn't understand the reality of your actions.
>
>
>
> >> maybe you should think about that next time you post...- Hide quoted text -
>
> > Don't have to, I'm not netcopping and indescrimately jumping on others
> > for percieved net infractions.
>
> eh? suddenly, you're the victim of your own argument but it's someone
> else's fault? that's stupid.
>
>
>
> > Go ahead and continue if you must (and you will because that's what
> > netcops and trolls do).
>
> go ahead and disassociate yourself from your own problems there big guy!-Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Cackle! Cackle!

You never disappoint.