Buying an '03 vs. an '04
11-16-2003, 09:14 PM
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Buying an '03 vs. an '04
In article <ded38a7.0311150922.15fcf2d4@posting.google.com> ,
simplycooking@yahoo.com (John Adamson) wrote:
> Hi folks, I've been presented with a great price on an 2003 accord lx
> and I've got a 2004 lx for only $100 more. I'm still considering the
> '03 due to the $100, the fact that I'm planning to hold it for over 7
> years and finally due to the fact that the excise tax over 5 years
> will be less.
>
> Can anyone offer any advice? Thanks.
If it was up to me--I would get the 2004. It will be worth more than the
2003 forever. The 2004 may look exactly like the 2003 but minor changes
were made to correct any problems found in the 2003 model. Honda does lots
of research related to any money they spent related to warranty repairs
done on the 2003 models. They use that research to fix any apparent
problems found in the 2003 model when they build the 2004 model.
simplycooking@yahoo.com (John Adamson) wrote:
> Hi folks, I've been presented with a great price on an 2003 accord lx
> and I've got a 2004 lx for only $100 more. I'm still considering the
> '03 due to the $100, the fact that I'm planning to hold it for over 7
> years and finally due to the fact that the excise tax over 5 years
> will be less.
>
> Can anyone offer any advice? Thanks.
If it was up to me--I would get the 2004. It will be worth more than the
2003 forever. The 2004 may look exactly like the 2003 but minor changes
were made to correct any problems found in the 2003 model. Honda does lots
of research related to any money they spent related to warranty repairs
done on the 2003 models. They use that research to fix any apparent
problems found in the 2003 model when they build the 2004 model.
11-16-2003, 09:14 PM
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Buying an '03 vs. an '04
In article <ded38a7.0311150922.15fcf2d4@posting.google.com> ,
simplycooking@yahoo.com (John Adamson) wrote:
> Hi folks, I've been presented with a great price on an 2003 accord lx
> and I've got a 2004 lx for only $100 more. I'm still considering the
> '03 due to the $100, the fact that I'm planning to hold it for over 7
> years and finally due to the fact that the excise tax over 5 years
> will be less.
>
> Can anyone offer any advice? Thanks.
If it was up to me--I would get the 2004. It will be worth more than the
2003 forever. The 2004 may look exactly like the 2003 but minor changes
were made to correct any problems found in the 2003 model. Honda does lots
of research related to any money they spent related to warranty repairs
done on the 2003 models. They use that research to fix any apparent
problems found in the 2003 model when they build the 2004 model.
simplycooking@yahoo.com (John Adamson) wrote:
> Hi folks, I've been presented with a great price on an 2003 accord lx
> and I've got a 2004 lx for only $100 more. I'm still considering the
> '03 due to the $100, the fact that I'm planning to hold it for over 7
> years and finally due to the fact that the excise tax over 5 years
> will be less.
>
> Can anyone offer any advice? Thanks.
If it was up to me--I would get the 2004. It will be worth more than the
2003 forever. The 2004 may look exactly like the 2003 but minor changes
were made to correct any problems found in the 2003 model. Honda does lots
of research related to any money they spent related to warranty repairs
done on the 2003 models. They use that research to fix any apparent
problems found in the 2003 model when they build the 2004 model.
11-17-2003, 05:36 PM
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Buying an '03 vs. an '04
Oliver Costich <olc-caNOSPAM@***.net> wrote in
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
11-17-2003, 05:36 PM
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Buying an '03 vs. an '04
Oliver Costich <olc-caNOSPAM@***.net> wrote in
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
11-17-2003, 05:36 PM
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Buying an '03 vs. an '04
Oliver Costich <olc-caNOSPAM@***.net> wrote in
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
11-17-2003, 05:36 PM
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Buying an '03 vs. an '04
Oliver Costich <olc-caNOSPAM@***.net> wrote in
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
news:vbcfrv4j61a65325kv5k9umb9925vkvpj3@4ax.com:
>
>
> I don't know about the Accords, but we recently bought a 2003 CR-V
> instead of waiting for a 2004 because Edmunds showed a $12 difference
> in the used value between a 4 year and a 5 year old CR-V when they
> have the same features and mileage.
I would check the manufacturing date (the decal on the driver's side door).
If the vehicle has been on the lot 10-12 months, some parts (like battery,
tires, fuel system) do wear and break down over time.
At a minimum, it should tell you something if they were not able to move
the car over a long period.
Good Luck.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GinoLicious
Traffic Tickets & Car Insurance Discussion
18
08-08-2005 12:43 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)