CHOKE on this!
#226
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
StingRay wrote:
[...]
> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
> in this world....are you"?
I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
'tis an easy task
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
[...]
> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
> in this world....are you"?
I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
'tis an easy task
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
#227
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
StingRay wrote:
[...]
> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
> in this world....are you"?
I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
'tis an easy task
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
[...]
> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
> in this world....are you"?
I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
'tis an easy task
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
#228
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:32:36 +0000, Alistair J Murray
<news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>StingRay wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
>I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
>'tis an easy task
Quite.
------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
<news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>StingRay wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
>I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
>'tis an easy task
Quite.
------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
#229
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:32:36 +0000, Alistair J Murray
<news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>StingRay wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
>I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
>'tis an easy task
Quite.
------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
<news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>StingRay wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
>I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
>'tis an easy task
Quite.
------------------------------------------------
The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
#230
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"Alistair J (for jumbled) Murray" <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:41df4653$0$73197$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
> StingRay wrote:
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when
>> in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is
>> "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute
>> people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
> I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
> 'tis an easy task
Now we have a mind reader amongst us! "I think he meant cite, as in "provide
a citation"... ". Just one problem. Brad said "cite", not "provide a
citation". It seems that you have just joined the dumbass ranks Al. (May I
call you Al?) Go back and read Brad's comment. No. Let me cut and paste it:
"Of course not, dumbass, and if you disagree then feel free to offer one
single cite showing that phrase ...". Even in the U.K., "cite" is not a
noun. It is a verb. Look it up. You're right Al . . . " 'tis an easy task ".
;-)
news:41df4653$0$73197$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
> StingRay wrote:
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when
>> in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is
>> "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute
>> people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
> I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
> 'tis an easy task
Now we have a mind reader amongst us! "I think he meant cite, as in "provide
a citation"... ". Just one problem. Brad said "cite", not "provide a
citation". It seems that you have just joined the dumbass ranks Al. (May I
call you Al?) Go back and read Brad's comment. No. Let me cut and paste it:
"Of course not, dumbass, and if you disagree then feel free to offer one
single cite showing that phrase ...". Even in the U.K., "cite" is not a
noun. It is a verb. Look it up. You're right Al . . . " 'tis an easy task ".
;-)
#231
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"Alistair J (for jumbled) Murray" <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:41df4653$0$73197$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
> StingRay wrote:
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when
>> in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is
>> "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute
>> people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
> I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
> 'tis an easy task
Now we have a mind reader amongst us! "I think he meant cite, as in "provide
a citation"... ". Just one problem. Brad said "cite", not "provide a
citation". It seems that you have just joined the dumbass ranks Al. (May I
call you Al?) Go back and read Brad's comment. No. Let me cut and paste it:
"Of course not, dumbass, and if you disagree then feel free to offer one
single cite showing that phrase ...". Even in the U.K., "cite" is not a
noun. It is a verb. Look it up. You're right Al . . . " 'tis an easy task ".
;-)
news:41df4653$0$73197$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net...
> StingRay wrote:
>> Brad, do you not see the irony in you calling someone else "dumbass" when
>> in
>> the same sentence you say "cite", when clearly, the proper word is
>> "site"?
>> If I may quote the village idiot: "You're not one of the more astute
>> people
>> in this world....are you"?
>
> I think he meant cite, as in "provide a citation"...
>
>> We'll let the group decide just who the dumbass is
>
> 'tis an easy task
Now we have a mind reader amongst us! "I think he meant cite, as in "provide
a citation"... ". Just one problem. Brad said "cite", not "provide a
citation". It seems that you have just joined the dumbass ranks Al. (May I
call you Al?) Go back and read Brad's comment. No. Let me cut and paste it:
"Of course not, dumbass, and if you disagree then feel free to offer one
single cite showing that phrase ...". Even in the U.K., "cite" is not a
noun. It is a verb. Look it up. You're right Al . . . " 'tis an easy task ".
;-)
#232
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"Eric Dreher" <ericd@***.nét> wrote in message
news:cgjut05p6sdk8bu0olio3hjs8gre68ea1s@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:32:36 +0000, Alistair J Murray
> <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Quite.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
and kick your *** for being so silly!
news:cgjut05p6sdk8bu0olio3hjs8gre68ea1s@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:32:36 +0000, Alistair J Murray
> <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Quite.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
and kick your *** for being so silly!
#233
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"Eric Dreher" <ericd@***.nét> wrote in message
news:cgjut05p6sdk8bu0olio3hjs8gre68ea1s@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:32:36 +0000, Alistair J Murray
> <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Quite.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
and kick your *** for being so silly!
news:cgjut05p6sdk8bu0olio3hjs8gre68ea1s@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 02:32:36 +0000, Alistair J Murray
> <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Quite.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> The DNC - Building a bridge to the 20th Century.
Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
and kick your *** for being so silly!
#234
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
StingRay wrote:
[...]
> Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
> around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
> say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
> and kick your *** for being so silly!
StiR, (may I call you StiR?) had you corrected "cite" to "citation" you
would have had a point...
....but you didn't.
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
[...]
> Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
> around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
> say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
> and kick your *** for being so silly!
StiR, (may I call you StiR?) had you corrected "cite" to "citation" you
would have had a point...
....but you didn't.
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
#235
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
StingRay wrote:
[...]
> Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
> around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
> say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
> and kick your *** for being so silly!
StiR, (may I call you StiR?) had you corrected "cite" to "citation" you
would have had a point...
....but you didn't.
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
[...]
> Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now turn
> around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant to
> say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your back
> and kick your *** for being so silly!
StiR, (may I call you StiR?) had you corrected "cite" to "citation" you
would have had a point...
....but you didn't.
A
--
Tony Blair, a Minister of the Crown, acted as the agent of a foreign power:
He is a Traitor
#236
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"Alistair J Murray" <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:41df5c34$0$51899$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
> StingRay wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now
>> turn
>> around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant
>> to
>> say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your
>> back
>> and kick your *** for being so silly!
>
> StiR, (may I call you StiR?) had you corrected "cite" to "citation" you
> would have had a point...
>
> ...but you didn't.
Al, you seem to have missed the relevent post where I responded directly to
your comments. Let me repeat it here:
"Now we have a mind reader amongst us! "I think he meant cite, as in
"provide a citation"... ". Just one problem. Brad said "cite", not "provide
a citation". It seems that you have just joined the dumbass ranks Al. (May
I call you Al?) Go back and read Brad's comment. No. Let me cut and paste
it: "Of course not, dumbass, and if you disagree then feel free to offer one
single cite showing that phrase ...". Even in the U.K., "cite" is not a
noun. It is a verb. Look it up. You're right Al . . . " 'tis an easy task ".
;-) " Even those of you from the Serene Republic of Leith should now
understand the matter under discussion. Perhaps you and Ric would now like
to apologise (I spelled it that was in deference to your country of
reference.) and kick each other in the ***. ;-)
#237
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"Alistair J Murray" <news@fluffy.f9.co.uk> wrote in message
news:41df5c34$0$51899$ed2619ec@ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net...
> StingRay wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>> Ric, (May I call you Ric?) this stupidity thing is ing fast! Now
>> turn
>> around and go back and read what Brad said, not what you think he meant
>> to
>> say. Then if you still agree with Al, bend your legs around behind your
>> back
>> and kick your *** for being so silly!
>
> StiR, (may I call you StiR?) had you corrected "cite" to "citation" you
> would have had a point...
>
> ...but you didn't.
Al, you seem to have missed the relevent post where I responded directly to
your comments. Let me repeat it here:
"Now we have a mind reader amongst us! "I think he meant cite, as in
"provide a citation"... ". Just one problem. Brad said "cite", not "provide
a citation". It seems that you have just joined the dumbass ranks Al. (May
I call you Al?) Go back and read Brad's comment. No. Let me cut and paste
it: "Of course not, dumbass, and if you disagree then feel free to offer one
single cite showing that phrase ...". Even in the U.K., "cite" is not a
noun. It is a verb. Look it up. You're right Al . . . " 'tis an easy task ".
;-) " Even those of you from the Serene Republic of Leith should now
understand the matter under discussion. Perhaps you and Ric would now like
to apologise (I spelled it that was in deference to your country of
reference.) and kick each other in the ***. ;-)
#238
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"StingRay" <StingRay@Vette.com> wrote in message
news:ZLidncq1zo9Hj0LcRVn-1A@rogers.com...
> "WickeddollŽ" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:348hnkF49499mU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "StingRay" <StingRay@Vette.com> wrote in message
>> news:54adnTeqi_vZkkLcRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>>> "WickeddollŽ" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:348gprF48aar6U1@individual.net...
>>>> Well, I tried to reason, but you'd rather take shots at me
>>>
>>> Natalie, you simply cannot rationalize your propagation of such an
>>> intrusive topic in an automotive NG. Your persecution complex goes
>>> hand-in-hand with your intrusive behaviour. Trust your instincts
>>> grasshopper - if you think you've dragged this string on long enough,
>>> you probably have!
>>
>> Lie number one - I never said I was going on too long. You pulled that
>> outta your ***
>
> Oooh! Temper, temper!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, I didn't even start this thread, so how about lambasting
>>>> the rest of them while you're at it. Hey, it's lonely down here in the
>>>> dungeon of your displeasure.
>>>
>>> Nat, (May I call you Nat?) you may not have started this thread, but you
>>> have certainly been keeping it going. Isn't it time to give it up? We
>>> all know your opinions inside out and we are exhausted.
>>>
>> No, you may call me Mrs. Larkowski, and just stop reading it! You can
>> killfile me and then you don't have to worry about seeing *any* of my
>> comments. For that matter, kill the others that are contributing to the
>> thread that you now are keeping alive as well! Sheesh - you will see
>> off-topic stuff in any unmoderated forum. If it really bothers you that
>> much, you're in for a lot of grief.
>
> My gosh Nat, with all your aggresive talk of "killfile me", "kill the
> others", we can only hope that you don't have a pointy object in your
> hand!
>
>>>>
>>>> Natalie, sighing at the human capacity to attack
>>>
>>> Funny how you consider yourself as being attacked, when it is you who
>>> perpetuate an OT post. We were feeling the same. *sigh*
>>>
>> I never personally attacked you, but with that condescending you
>> said earlier, you certainly attacked me.
>
> Hmmm, could I buy a vowel? What the hell are you talking about? What
> personal attack? Quote?
>
>>
>> OT posts will never disappear from the whole of Usenet. Deal with it, as
>> you seem to be the only one really upset about it.
>
> No Nat, I'm not the only one upset about it. I am the only one to
> challenge it and that's a big difference. The rest have probably either
> filtered the thread or killfiled us both. That's reality!
>
>>
>> Natalie
>>
>
>
Stingray,
I have not read half the posts in this thread but ISTM that you are the one
perpetuating this thread by not letting it die. Your protestation about
another is like a pot calling a kettle black. We all can the that both are
the same apart from one bleating like a wounded sheep while still
crossposting to all and sundry.
Generally this is the behaviour of a low-life TROLL.
Huw
#239
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"StingRay" <StingRay@Vette.com> wrote in message
news:ZLidncq1zo9Hj0LcRVn-1A@rogers.com...
> "WickeddollŽ" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:348hnkF49499mU1@individual.net...
>>
>> "StingRay" <StingRay@Vette.com> wrote in message
>> news:54adnTeqi_vZkkLcRVn-1A@rogers.com...
>>> "WickeddollŽ" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>> news:348gprF48aar6U1@individual.net...
>>>> Well, I tried to reason, but you'd rather take shots at me
>>>
>>> Natalie, you simply cannot rationalize your propagation of such an
>>> intrusive topic in an automotive NG. Your persecution complex goes
>>> hand-in-hand with your intrusive behaviour. Trust your instincts
>>> grasshopper - if you think you've dragged this string on long enough,
>>> you probably have!
>>
>> Lie number one - I never said I was going on too long. You pulled that
>> outta your ***
>
> Oooh! Temper, temper!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, I didn't even start this thread, so how about lambasting
>>>> the rest of them while you're at it. Hey, it's lonely down here in the
>>>> dungeon of your displeasure.
>>>
>>> Nat, (May I call you Nat?) you may not have started this thread, but you
>>> have certainly been keeping it going. Isn't it time to give it up? We
>>> all know your opinions inside out and we are exhausted.
>>>
>> No, you may call me Mrs. Larkowski, and just stop reading it! You can
>> killfile me and then you don't have to worry about seeing *any* of my
>> comments. For that matter, kill the others that are contributing to the
>> thread that you now are keeping alive as well! Sheesh - you will see
>> off-topic stuff in any unmoderated forum. If it really bothers you that
>> much, you're in for a lot of grief.
>
> My gosh Nat, with all your aggresive talk of "killfile me", "kill the
> others", we can only hope that you don't have a pointy object in your
> hand!
>
>>>>
>>>> Natalie, sighing at the human capacity to attack
>>>
>>> Funny how you consider yourself as being attacked, when it is you who
>>> perpetuate an OT post. We were feeling the same. *sigh*
>>>
>> I never personally attacked you, but with that condescending you
>> said earlier, you certainly attacked me.
>
> Hmmm, could I buy a vowel? What the hell are you talking about? What
> personal attack? Quote?
>
>>
>> OT posts will never disappear from the whole of Usenet. Deal with it, as
>> you seem to be the only one really upset about it.
>
> No Nat, I'm not the only one upset about it. I am the only one to
> challenge it and that's a big difference. The rest have probably either
> filtered the thread or killfiled us both. That's reality!
>
>>
>> Natalie
>>
>
>
Stingray,
I have not read half the posts in this thread but ISTM that you are the one
perpetuating this thread by not letting it die. Your protestation about
another is like a pot calling a kettle black. We all can the that both are
the same apart from one bleating like a wounded sheep while still
crossposting to all and sundry.
Generally this is the behaviour of a low-life TROLL.
Huw
#240
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - Re: CHOKE on this!
"StingRay" <StingRay@Vette.com> wrote in message
news:SrydnT3JGJv9gULcRVn-3Q@rogers.com...
> "WickeddollŽ" <wickeddoll1958nofeckingspam@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:348jo5F46hrb3U1@individual.net...
>> *ducking back into the cross-post to answer Hagrinas*
>> I'm only posting on this subject to the alt.auto.toyota now, so if you
>> care to discuss it further, that's where I'll be (I'm not subscribed to
>> any of these other NGs anyway)
>>
>> Natalie, ducking out to go back to her home turf
> It's easy to see why you, Hag and Brad were off on a tangent about
> cigarette smoke in an automotive NewsGroup. We seem to have just proven
> that you are easily thrown off topic. It's like an illness Nat. I threw
> the three of you so far off your OT discussion that you became frustrated
> and bailed to frienlier environs.
>
> If I may offer some friendly advice, Nat, have you not heard of e-mail?
> Why don't you, Hag and Brad simply e-mail each other, since you are the
> only ones interested in this topic? Duh@Nat! Or start a new NG devoted to
> the non-smoking bandwagon. Then you can hovel in your element. I'm gonna
> miss you though Nat. Call me crazy, but I was enjoying experiencing your
> hyperventilation! Now Nat, take a deep breath and relax. :-)
>
Arsehole [may I call you Arsehole?], what exactly have you posted about
exhaust pollution from diesel exhaust in this string? I ask this because the
OP had a comparison of this with cigarette smoke but the thread drifted
somewhat to one side. Thing is, I have not seen one post from you that has
been on topic. So why comment and criticise at all except to TROLL. Please
desist immediately dear Arsehole, because you do tend to stink worse than
either diesel exhaust or cigarette smoke.
Wipe yourself on the way out.
Huw