Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:50:02 GMT, Brian Nystrom
<brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote: >HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >> news:ctmdnT5DGZCWZ0zZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >> >>>HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >>> >>>>"Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>>news:UglAg.14167$Ju.1048@trndny09... >>>> hmmmm. >>>> >>>>>Probably the biggest benefit of UOA is that it proves to people that >>>>>oils last much longer than many of them think. With any kind of luck, >> >> it >> >>>>>will convince people once and for all that changing your oil any more >>>>>frequently than the car manufacturer recommends is an unnecessary waste >>>>>of a diminishing resource. Any money saved is a secondary benefit. >>>> >>>>Actually, it doesn't prove that at all. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>er, actually, yes it does. >> >> >> If it proves it to you, that is fair enough. What is your background of >> expertise in >> this subject? >> >> But it doesnt prove it to me. > >Well, perhaps you regard ignorance and stubborness as virtues, but I >don't. It never ceases to amaze me that people can look at scientific >data that refutes their beliefs and just dismiss it because they don't >like it. It takes all kinds, I guess... Faith based car maintenance? |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
Stubby wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote: >> With a car, sure I'd just keep on driving it. Oil analysis can't >> predict with any certainty when an engine will fail. In a airplane, >> I'd have it torn down and inspected. However, this is much easier >> than with most cars. A good aircraft mechanic can rebuild the top end >> of an airplane engine in the time the car mechanic is getting the >> accessories removed from a modern car. > > To rebuild a small airplane engine costs about $20,000 and takes months. > You don't want to do it unless you have good evidence that it is needed. Hah. That all depends on how deep your pockets are. I've seen an engine exchange ($$$$$$) in a commercially-owned single-engine tri-tail bonanza. Total downtime was 3 days, but they prolly spent $25k on the job in the mid 90s. The biggest issue with general aviation aircraft is they're still using 100% manual engine controls. While our cars have advanced greatly in engine management, airplanes are still dicking around with mixture and carb heat knobs. All it takes is one descent with the mixture knob out to destroy an engine. Or you run overrich and get crappy economy and clogged up sparkplugs. JS |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
Stubby wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote: >> With a car, sure I'd just keep on driving it. Oil analysis can't >> predict with any certainty when an engine will fail. In a airplane, >> I'd have it torn down and inspected. However, this is much easier >> than with most cars. A good aircraft mechanic can rebuild the top end >> of an airplane engine in the time the car mechanic is getting the >> accessories removed from a modern car. > > To rebuild a small airplane engine costs about $20,000 and takes months. > You don't want to do it unless you have good evidence that it is needed. Hah. That all depends on how deep your pockets are. I've seen an engine exchange ($$$$$$) in a commercially-owned single-engine tri-tail bonanza. Total downtime was 3 days, but they prolly spent $25k on the job in the mid 90s. The biggest issue with general aviation aircraft is they're still using 100% manual engine controls. While our cars have advanced greatly in engine management, airplanes are still dicking around with mixture and carb heat knobs. All it takes is one descent with the mixture knob out to destroy an engine. Or you run overrich and get crappy economy and clogged up sparkplugs. JS |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
Stubby wrote:
> Matt Whiting wrote: >> With a car, sure I'd just keep on driving it. Oil analysis can't >> predict with any certainty when an engine will fail. In a airplane, >> I'd have it torn down and inspected. However, this is much easier >> than with most cars. A good aircraft mechanic can rebuild the top end >> of an airplane engine in the time the car mechanic is getting the >> accessories removed from a modern car. > > To rebuild a small airplane engine costs about $20,000 and takes months. > You don't want to do it unless you have good evidence that it is needed. Hah. That all depends on how deep your pockets are. I've seen an engine exchange ($$$$$$) in a commercially-owned single-engine tri-tail bonanza. Total downtime was 3 days, but they prolly spent $25k on the job in the mid 90s. The biggest issue with general aviation aircraft is they're still using 100% manual engine controls. While our cars have advanced greatly in engine management, airplanes are still dicking around with mixture and carb heat knobs. All it takes is one descent with the mixture knob out to destroy an engine. Or you run overrich and get crappy economy and clogged up sparkplugs. JS |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
The Ghost of General Lee wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:50:02 GMT, Brian Nystrom > <brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote: > >> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >>> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>> news:ctmdnT5DGZCWZ0zZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >>> >>>> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:UglAg.14167$Ju.1048@trndny09... >>>>> hmmmm. >>>>> >>>>>> Probably the biggest benefit of UOA is that it proves to people that >>>>>> oils last much longer than many of them think. With any kind of luck, >>> it >>> >>>>>> will convince people once and for all that changing your oil any more >>>>>> frequently than the car manufacturer recommends is an unnecessary waste >>>>>> of a diminishing resource. Any money saved is a secondary benefit. >>>>> Actually, it doesn't prove that at all. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> er, actually, yes it does. >>> >>> If it proves it to you, that is fair enough. What is your background of >>> expertise in >>> this subject? >>> >>> But it doesnt prove it to me. >> Well, perhaps you regard ignorance and stubborness as virtues, but I >> don't. It never ceases to amaze me that people can look at scientific >> data that refutes their beliefs and just dismiss it because they don't >> like it. It takes all kinds, I guess... > > Faith based car maintenance? > sure! beats bothering to actually learn anything. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
The Ghost of General Lee wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:50:02 GMT, Brian Nystrom > <brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote: > >> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >>> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>> news:ctmdnT5DGZCWZ0zZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >>> >>>> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:UglAg.14167$Ju.1048@trndny09... >>>>> hmmmm. >>>>> >>>>>> Probably the biggest benefit of UOA is that it proves to people that >>>>>> oils last much longer than many of them think. With any kind of luck, >>> it >>> >>>>>> will convince people once and for all that changing your oil any more >>>>>> frequently than the car manufacturer recommends is an unnecessary waste >>>>>> of a diminishing resource. Any money saved is a secondary benefit. >>>>> Actually, it doesn't prove that at all. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> er, actually, yes it does. >>> >>> If it proves it to you, that is fair enough. What is your background of >>> expertise in >>> this subject? >>> >>> But it doesnt prove it to me. >> Well, perhaps you regard ignorance and stubborness as virtues, but I >> don't. It never ceases to amaze me that people can look at scientific >> data that refutes their beliefs and just dismiss it because they don't >> like it. It takes all kinds, I guess... > > Faith based car maintenance? > sure! beats bothering to actually learn anything. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
The Ghost of General Lee wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:50:02 GMT, Brian Nystrom > <brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote: > >> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >>> "jim beam" <nospam@example.net> wrote in message >>> news:ctmdnT5DGZCWZ0zZnZ2dnUVZ_uidnZ2d@speakeasy.ne t... >>> >>>> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >>>> >>>>> "Brian Nystrom" <brian.nystrom@verizon.net> wrote in message >>>>> news:UglAg.14167$Ju.1048@trndny09... >>>>> hmmmm. >>>>> >>>>>> Probably the biggest benefit of UOA is that it proves to people that >>>>>> oils last much longer than many of them think. With any kind of luck, >>> it >>> >>>>>> will convince people once and for all that changing your oil any more >>>>>> frequently than the car manufacturer recommends is an unnecessary waste >>>>>> of a diminishing resource. Any money saved is a secondary benefit. >>>>> Actually, it doesn't prove that at all. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> er, actually, yes it does. >>> >>> If it proves it to you, that is fair enough. What is your background of >>> expertise in >>> this subject? >>> >>> But it doesnt prove it to me. >> Well, perhaps you regard ignorance and stubborness as virtues, but I >> don't. It never ceases to amaze me that people can look at scientific >> data that refutes their beliefs and just dismiss it because they don't >> like it. It takes all kinds, I guess... > > Faith based car maintenance? > sure! beats bothering to actually learn anything. |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
Nobody Important wrote:
> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >> I would have found it out without an oil analysis, because I replace >> my air filters regularly. It's cheaper, and less ambiguous, than >> spending >> money on an oil analysis and analyst. > > In my neck of the woods, air filters need to be replaced only once every > two years or so; they don't get dirty enough to warrant replacement > before then. I had replaced mine in Jan 2005 and wasn't due for a > replacement for another 8 months or so. Once a year here, sometimes twice. Pine pollen season clogs them up noticeably every time. Sometimes hay season can do it, too. On my dodge truck, OTOH, which spends time on sand/silt roads and has the worlds crappiest air intake design ever (it sucks air right off the passenger wheel), its about 3x a year and I put about 1/3rd as many miles on it. JS |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
Nobody Important wrote:
> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >> I would have found it out without an oil analysis, because I replace >> my air filters regularly. It's cheaper, and less ambiguous, than >> spending >> money on an oil analysis and analyst. > > In my neck of the woods, air filters need to be replaced only once every > two years or so; they don't get dirty enough to warrant replacement > before then. I had replaced mine in Jan 2005 and wasn't due for a > replacement for another 8 months or so. Once a year here, sometimes twice. Pine pollen season clogs them up noticeably every time. Sometimes hay season can do it, too. On my dodge truck, OTOH, which spends time on sand/silt roads and has the worlds crappiest air intake design ever (it sucks air right off the passenger wheel), its about 3x a year and I put about 1/3rd as many miles on it. JS |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
Nobody Important wrote:
> HLS@nospam.nix wrote: >> I would have found it out without an oil analysis, because I replace >> my air filters regularly. It's cheaper, and less ambiguous, than >> spending >> money on an oil analysis and analyst. > > In my neck of the woods, air filters need to be replaced only once every > two years or so; they don't get dirty enough to warrant replacement > before then. I had replaced mine in Jan 2005 and wasn't due for a > replacement for another 8 months or so. Once a year here, sometimes twice. Pine pollen season clogs them up noticeably every time. Sometimes hay season can do it, too. On my dodge truck, OTOH, which spends time on sand/silt roads and has the worlds crappiest air intake design ever (it sucks air right off the passenger wheel), its about 3x a year and I put about 1/3rd as many miles on it. JS |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
So... I take it nobody has seen that this cross posting bastuhd hasn't
replied to his thread???? "I'll have spam. spam. spam, spam, baked beans and spam".... "dbltap" <DoubleTap@37.com> wrote in message news:1ucAg.2477$xp2.1947@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net... > http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/d...-via-analysis/ > |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
So... I take it nobody has seen that this cross posting bastuhd hasn't
replied to his thread???? "I'll have spam. spam. spam, spam, baked beans and spam".... "dbltap" <DoubleTap@37.com> wrote in message news:1ucAg.2477$xp2.1947@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net... > http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/d...-via-analysis/ > |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
So... I take it nobody has seen that this cross posting bastuhd hasn't
replied to his thread???? "I'll have spam. spam. spam, spam, baked beans and spam".... "dbltap" <DoubleTap@37.com> wrote in message news:1ucAg.2477$xp2.1947@newsread1.news.pas.earthl ink.net... > http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/02/d...-via-analysis/ > |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
JS wrote:
> Stubby wrote: > >> Matt Whiting wrote: >> >>> With a car, sure I'd just keep on driving it. Oil analysis can't >>> predict with any certainty when an engine will fail. In a airplane, >>> I'd have it torn down and inspected. However, this is much easier >>> than with most cars. A good aircraft mechanic can rebuild the top >>> end of an airplane engine in the time the car mechanic is getting the >>> accessories removed from a modern car. >> >> >> To rebuild a small airplane engine costs about $20,000 and takes >> months. You don't want to do it unless you have good evidence that it >> is needed. > > > Hah. That all depends on how deep your pockets are. I've seen an > engine exchange ($$$$$$) in a commercially-owned single-engine tri-tail > bonanza. Total downtime was 3 days, but they prolly spent $25k on the > job in the mid 90s. > > The biggest issue with general aviation aircraft is they're still using > 100% manual engine controls. While our cars have advanced greatly in > engine management, airplanes are still dicking around with mixture and > carb heat knobs. All it takes is one descent with the mixture knob out > to destroy an engine. Or you run overrich and get crappy economy and > clogged up sparkplugs. Not all airplanes. Check out Cirrus and other new designs. Matt |
Re: Determining oil change intervals via analysis
JS wrote:
> Stubby wrote: > >> Matt Whiting wrote: >> >>> With a car, sure I'd just keep on driving it. Oil analysis can't >>> predict with any certainty when an engine will fail. In a airplane, >>> I'd have it torn down and inspected. However, this is much easier >>> than with most cars. A good aircraft mechanic can rebuild the top >>> end of an airplane engine in the time the car mechanic is getting the >>> accessories removed from a modern car. >> >> >> To rebuild a small airplane engine costs about $20,000 and takes >> months. You don't want to do it unless you have good evidence that it >> is needed. > > > Hah. That all depends on how deep your pockets are. I've seen an > engine exchange ($$$$$$) in a commercially-owned single-engine tri-tail > bonanza. Total downtime was 3 days, but they prolly spent $25k on the > job in the mid 90s. > > The biggest issue with general aviation aircraft is they're still using > 100% manual engine controls. While our cars have advanced greatly in > engine management, airplanes are still dicking around with mixture and > carb heat knobs. All it takes is one descent with the mixture knob out > to destroy an engine. Or you run overrich and get crappy economy and > clogged up sparkplugs. Not all airplanes. Check out Cirrus and other new designs. Matt |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:52 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands