Re: Element Load Capacity
 

In article <yCwxb.55240$oN2.54839@edtnps84>,
Becker <becker@hotmail.com> wrote:

> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
> carry so little!
> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.

It isn't overloading the tranny.

It's more likely the lawyers. Wait until you get three guys in that
vehicle, and get into a wreck, and the car doesn't perform so well and
you try to sue Honda. Their lawyers will be all over that, claiming
that you overloaded it.

You could counterstrike, saying that their load limit was unreasonable.
Good luck.

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

In article <yCwxb.55240$oN2.54839@edtnps84>,
Becker <becker@hotmail.com> wrote:

> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
> carry so little!
> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.

It isn't overloading the tranny.

It's more likely the lawyers. Wait until you get three guys in that
vehicle, and get into a wreck, and the car doesn't perform so well and
you try to sue Honda. Their lawyers will be all over that, claiming
that you overloaded it.

You could counterstrike, saying that their load limit was unreasonable.
Good luck.

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

In article <yCwxb.55240$oN2.54839@edtnps84>,
Becker <becker@hotmail.com> wrote:

> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
> carry so little!
> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.

It isn't overloading the tranny.

It's more likely the lawyers. Wait until you get three guys in that
vehicle, and get into a wreck, and the car doesn't perform so well and
you try to sue Honda. Their lawyers will be all over that, claiming
that you overloaded it.

You could counterstrike, saying that their load limit was unreasonable.
Good luck.

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Becker wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>> the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>> max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>> I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>> "vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>> mind.
>>
>>
>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>
>
> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
> carry so little!
> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.

Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
looking at the size of the thing.

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Becker wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>> the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>> max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>> I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>> "vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>> mind.
>>
>>
>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>
>
> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
> carry so little!
> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.

Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
looking at the size of the thing.

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Becker wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>> the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>> max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>> I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>> "vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>> mind.
>>
>>
>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>
>
> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
> carry so little!
> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.

Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
looking at the size of the thing.

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Becker wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>> the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>> max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>> I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>> "vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>> mind.
>>
>>
>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>
>
> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
> carry so little!
> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.

Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
looking at the size of the thing.

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

L Alpert wrote:

> Becker wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>>>the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>>>max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>>>I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>>>"vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>>>mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>
>>
>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>carry so little!
>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>
>
> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
> looking at the size of the thing.
>
Hi,
Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
Tony

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

L Alpert wrote:

> Becker wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>>>the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>>>max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>>>I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>>>"vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>>>mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>
>>
>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>carry so little!
>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>
>
> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
> looking at the size of the thing.
>
Hi,
Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
Tony

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

L Alpert wrote:

> Becker wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>>>the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>>>max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>>>I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>>>"vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>>>mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>
>>
>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>carry so little!
>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>
>
> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
> looking at the size of the thing.
>
Hi,
Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
Tony

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

L Alpert wrote:

> Becker wrote:
>
>>L Alpert wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Becker wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife plus
>>>>the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it close to the
>>>>max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a car, it's a joke!
>>>>I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at Honda who approved this
>>>>"vehicle" to be released on the market and give him a piece of my
>>>>mind.
>>>
>>>
>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>
>>
>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>carry so little!
>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>
>
> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it myself
> looking at the size of the thing.
>
Hi,
Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
Tony

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>
>>>
>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>> carry so little!
>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>> myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>
> Hi,
> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
> many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
> near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
> feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
> Tony

Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
know, make it look cool but completely useless.....

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>
>>>
>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>> carry so little!
>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>> myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>
> Hi,
> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
> many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
> near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
> feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
> Tony

Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
know, make it look cool but completely useless.....

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>
>>>
>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>> carry so little!
>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>> myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>
> Hi,
> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
> many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
> near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
> feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
> Tony

Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
know, make it look cool but completely useless.....

Re: Element Load Capacity
 

Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote:
>
>> Becker wrote:
>>
>>> L Alpert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Becker wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife
>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it
>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a
>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at
>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market
>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first?
>>>
>>>
>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will
>>> carry so little!
>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the
>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it
>> myself looking at the size of the thing.
>>
> Hi,
> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had
> many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at
> near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose
> feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed!
> Tony

Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I
know, make it look cool but completely useless.....