Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote: > Tony Hwang wrote: > >>L Alpert wrote: >> >> >>>Becker wrote: >>> >>> >>>>L Alpert wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Becker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>> >>>> >>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will >>>>carry so little! >>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>> >>> >>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it >>>myself looking at the size of the thing. >>> >> >>Hi, >>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had >>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at >>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose >>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>Tony > > > Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I > know, make it look cool but completely useless..... > Hi, Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) Tony > |
Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote: > Tony Hwang wrote: > >>L Alpert wrote: >> >> >>>Becker wrote: >>> >>> >>>>L Alpert wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Becker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>> >>>> >>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will >>>>carry so little! >>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>> >>> >>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it >>>myself looking at the size of the thing. >>> >> >>Hi, >>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had >>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at >>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose >>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>Tony > > > Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I > know, make it look cool but completely useless..... > Hi, Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) Tony > |
Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote: > Tony Hwang wrote: > >>L Alpert wrote: >> >> >>>Becker wrote: >>> >>> >>>>L Alpert wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Becker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>> >>>> >>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will >>>>carry so little! >>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>> >>> >>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it >>>myself looking at the size of the thing. >>> >> >>Hi, >>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had >>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at >>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose >>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>Tony > > > Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I > know, make it look cool but completely useless..... > Hi, Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) Tony > |
Re: Element Load Capacity
L Alpert wrote: > Tony Hwang wrote: > >>L Alpert wrote: >> >> >>>Becker wrote: >>> >>> >>>>L Alpert wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Becker wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>> >>>> >>>>In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car will >>>>carry so little! >>>>Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>> >>> >>>Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed it >>>myself looking at the size of the thing. >>> >> >>Hi, >>Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It had >>many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight was at >>near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments with goose >>feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>Tony > > > Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work under. I > know, make it look cool but completely useless..... > Hi, Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) Tony > |
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote: >> Tony Hwang wrote: >> >>> L Alpert wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Becker wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> L Alpert wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Becker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car >>>>> will carry so little! >>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed >>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing. >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It >>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight >>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments >>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>> Tony >> >> >> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work >> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless..... >> > Hi, > Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). > Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) > Tony I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager..... |
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote: >> Tony Hwang wrote: >> >>> L Alpert wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Becker wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> L Alpert wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Becker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car >>>>> will carry so little! >>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed >>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing. >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It >>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight >>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments >>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>> Tony >> >> >> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work >> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless..... >> > Hi, > Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). > Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) > Tony I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager..... |
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote: >> Tony Hwang wrote: >> >>> L Alpert wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Becker wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> L Alpert wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Becker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car >>>>> will carry so little! >>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed >>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing. >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It >>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight >>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments >>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>> Tony >> >> >> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work >> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless..... >> > Hi, > Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). > Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) > Tony I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager..... |
Re: Element Load Capacity
Tony Hwang wrote:
> L Alpert wrote: >> Tony Hwang wrote: >> >>> L Alpert wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Becker wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> L Alpert wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Becker wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, you are right. I'm 6'3" and not overweight. Me and my wife >>>>>>> plus the animal my wife calls it "Tiny" (it's a dog) make it >>>>>>> close to the max. capacity of this car. I shouldn't call it a >>>>>>> car, it's a joke! I'd like to get the e-mail of the idiot at >>>>>>> Honda who approved this "vehicle" to be released on the market >>>>>>> and give him a piece of my mind. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wouldn't have been more prudent to do a little homework first? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> In my worst nightmares I wouldn't imagine that such a huge car >>>>> will carry so little! >>>>> Hell, if the animal will have any puppies, it will be them or the >>>>> toolbox. Or risk overloading the tranny. >>>> >>>> >>>> Yeah, I guess you are right. I probably would have never noticed >>>> it myself looking at the size of the thing. >>>> >>> >>> Hi, >>> Reminds me of a model of motor home they built a few years ago. It >>> had many sub basement compartments but the overall vehilce weight >>> was at near max. Math showed they could only fill the compartments >>> with goose feather pillows. Safety hazard for uninformed! >>> Tony >> >> >> Makes me wonder under what directive the design engineers work >> under. I know, make it look cool but completely useless..... >> > Hi, > Engineers are always under bean counters(sales kind). > Don't blame engineers. (I am one but not in automotive side) > Tony I used to be one as well. I have been demoted to manager..... |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:34 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands