|
Hondas SUCK!
I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God,
after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
98' Camaro wrote:
> I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. > Since this was not crossposted I feel comfortable to reply. Friends of mine have vets camoros mustangs and other muscle low-rev torque developing engine cars, even subaru wrx is low-rev torque engine compared to most honda products. They are all nice car if you enjoy them, if I was richer, I would own most of them a take a drive on a different one depending on how I feel. I have been following honda for years and what I like about honda is that they are usally ligther than any other car in their category, do not need turbos to compete with the cars in the same category, and reminds me my motocross bike when I drive around town. Yes, not much torque, high hp at high rev with low weight/hp ratio, reminds me a little of a formula car ;-) On that matter, I am glad honda is doing better with BAR in F-1. Which F-1 team uses camaro engine already ? ;-) -john |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
98' Camaro wrote:
> I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. > Since this was not crossposted I feel comfortable to reply. Friends of mine have vets camoros mustangs and other muscle low-rev torque developing engine cars, even subaru wrx is low-rev torque engine compared to most honda products. They are all nice car if you enjoy them, if I was richer, I would own most of them a take a drive on a different one depending on how I feel. I have been following honda for years and what I like about honda is that they are usally ligther than any other car in their category, do not need turbos to compete with the cars in the same category, and reminds me my motocross bike when I drive around town. Yes, not much torque, high hp at high rev with low weight/hp ratio, reminds me a little of a formula car ;-) On that matter, I am glad honda is doing better with BAR in F-1. Which F-1 team uses camaro engine already ? ;-) -john |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
"98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:7993-417B380C-120@storefull-3175.bay.webtv.net... > I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. > You need to recognize that you are looking at a board that focuses on solving problems. So, that is predominantly what your are going to find when you come here. Considering that there a seemingly millions of Hondas out there driving billions of miles and that this board seems to get under ten new threads a day, I'd say that an extremely high level of build quality is indicated. |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
"98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:7993-417B380C-120@storefull-3175.bay.webtv.net... > I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. > You need to recognize that you are looking at a board that focuses on solving problems. So, that is predominantly what your are going to find when you come here. Considering that there a seemingly millions of Hondas out there driving billions of miles and that this board seems to get under ten new threads a day, I'd say that an extremely high level of build quality is indicated. |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
In article <J6Ned.5583$KJ6.2156@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink. net>,
"Larry B" <hatespam@hatespam.gov> wrote: > this board seems to get under ten > new threads a day, I'd say that an extremely high level of build quality is > indicated. As opposed to the Camaro boards--which, while also getting fewer than ten new threads a day, are filled with complete illiterates. And that explains their lack of activity. If you can't read or write, you tend not to go to places like that. |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
In article <J6Ned.5583$KJ6.2156@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink. net>,
"Larry B" <hatespam@hatespam.gov> wrote: > this board seems to get under ten > new threads a day, I'd say that an extremely high level of build quality is > indicated. As opposed to the Camaro boards--which, while also getting fewer than ten new threads a day, are filled with complete illiterates. And that explains their lack of activity. If you can't read or write, you tend not to go to places like that. |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
98' Camaro wrote: > > I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll me not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
98' Camaro wrote: > > I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll Troll me not!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
"98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7993-417B380C-120@storefull-3175.bay.webtv.net... > I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. Obviously this post is from an imbecilic, foolish troll. No human being in their right mind would even remotely think about comparing GM's Chevrolet product line's overall quality to that of Honda's. That's probably one of the most absurd comparisons in the history of the automotive industry. How many Camaros do you see on the road today compared to the number of Accords and Civics alone? Do you think all of these Accord and Civic drivers have purchased their vehicles due to their reputations as being junk as you stated? FOOL! I've visited several of your beloved GM boards and the myriad problems reported there are downright scary. Same for Edmunds.com. Sure Honda has their fare share of problems too, but over the years Honda has developed a reputation for making high quality cars. The same simply cannot be said for 'The Heartbeat of America', 'Like A Rock' Chevrolet product line. Like a rock, right, their resale value drops like a rock compared to Hondas!!! Oh, want to talk about speed? Take a look at how many Honda engines were used in the top 6 finishers' cars at Indy this year. I rest my case--FOOL! J. Perry |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
"98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:7993-417B380C-120@storefull-3175.bay.webtv.net... > I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. Obviously this post is from an imbecilic, foolish troll. No human being in their right mind would even remotely think about comparing GM's Chevrolet product line's overall quality to that of Honda's. That's probably one of the most absurd comparisons in the history of the automotive industry. How many Camaros do you see on the road today compared to the number of Accords and Civics alone? Do you think all of these Accord and Civic drivers have purchased their vehicles due to their reputations as being junk as you stated? FOOL! I've visited several of your beloved GM boards and the myriad problems reported there are downright scary. Same for Edmunds.com. Sure Honda has their fare share of problems too, but over the years Honda has developed a reputation for making high quality cars. The same simply cannot be said for 'The Heartbeat of America', 'Like A Rock' Chevrolet product line. Like a rock, right, their resale value drops like a rock compared to Hondas!!! Oh, want to talk about speed? Take a look at how many Honda engines were used in the top 6 finishers' cars at Indy this year. I rest my case--FOOL! J. Perry |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote: > > In article <J6Ned.5583$KJ6.2156@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink. net>, > "Larry B" <hatespam@hatespam.gov> wrote: > > > this board seems to get under ten > > new threads a day, I'd say that an extremely high level of build quality is > > indicated. > > As opposed to the Camaro boards--which, while also getting fewer than > ten new threads a day, are filled with complete illiterates. And that > explains their lack of activity. If you can't read or write, you tend > not to go to places like that. Fewer than ten a day, eh? Brings tears to my old eyes... As I chiefly hang out in alt.autos.studebaker where the posts number at least a couple hundred daily and we're reasonably civilized too... -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
"Elmo P. Shagnasty" wrote: > > In article <J6Ned.5583$KJ6.2156@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink. net>, > "Larry B" <hatespam@hatespam.gov> wrote: > > > this board seems to get under ten > > new threads a day, I'd say that an extremely high level of build quality is > > indicated. > > As opposed to the Camaro boards--which, while also getting fewer than > ten new threads a day, are filled with complete illiterates. And that > explains their lack of activity. If you can't read or write, you tend > not to go to places like that. Fewer than ten a day, eh? Brings tears to my old eyes... As I chiefly hang out in alt.autos.studebaker where the posts number at least a couple hundred daily and we're reasonably civilized too... -- JT Just tooling through cyberspace in my ancient G4 |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
ATTENTION ALL HONDA OWNERS:
Due to the insidious content of the post from '98 Camaro, please realize that it needs no response: => Firstly, it's likely from a disgruntled Chevy/Ford/CRYsler owner that is simply trying to get a reaction from a group where the RESEARCH DATA states exactly the opposite of his/her claims; => Secondly, he/she is likely a member of the F.E.S. (ie: Flat Earth Society). "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:7993-417B380C-120@storefull-3175.bay.webtv.net... >I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. > |
Re: Hondas SUCK!
ATTENTION ALL HONDA OWNERS:
Due to the insidious content of the post from '98 Camaro, please realize that it needs no response: => Firstly, it's likely from a disgruntled Chevy/Ford/CRYsler owner that is simply trying to get a reaction from a group where the RESEARCH DATA states exactly the opposite of his/her claims; => Secondly, he/she is likely a member of the F.E.S. (ie: Flat Earth Society). "98' Camaro" <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote in message news:7993-417B380C-120@storefull-3175.bay.webtv.net... >I like to come to alt.autos.honda- I don't own a Honda (and thank God, > after reading all these posts of what's going wrong with them.) The > reason I like to come to the Honda message board is because: I have > NEVER seen anyone in so much defense of their vehicles, as Honda owners > are. Is it because you realize that Hondas are junk (which, would appear > you do, from the wide array of posts of what has gone wrong with > Hondas?) Now, I realize that SOME (notice I said "some") Hondas can beat > a Camaro of ANY type- stock or not- which is fine (I could careless, > really.) However, when it comes to which vehicle is "junk," take a look > at your very own board: alt.autos.honda. > |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands