Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

Well, if you live in certain US states, you could have Canada below you.
Not the entire country, but Ottawa and all the other major cities.

Cosmin

Jamco wrote:
> why do you rerfer to Canada as Down here? where would you have to live to
> have Canada below you?
>

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in news:417fd871_1@news.tm.net.my:

>| a reputation for making high quality cars.
> My '90 accord 's rustproofing is very good ( still no rust in this
> humid climate ) & great 4ws, but I've found 5 minor design*flaws (
> same in other brands too ), & replaced cheapo / inefficient parts (
> manifold, plug cables, steel wheels ). Now average 14.2 km / litre of
> RON97, if 70% of trip is highway, despite its 1.3 ton weight !
> Honda has many good qualities, but design & assembly are not 100%
> perfect : my [i] starter switch failed @68800km, [ii] Mitsuba radiator
> fan motor needed oil @75900 km ( not in service schedule ) & 1 bolt @
> bottom of radiator rusted & jammed ( like no oil / grease was used on
> bolts during assembly ) [iii] left rear wheel bearing too lacked
> grease & whined by 65000 km.
>
>
>

Every new Honda off the truck needs an alignment. 1 Acura and 3 new Hondas
for me and every one had a screwed up alignment.

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in news:417fd871_1@news.tm.net.my:

>| a reputation for making high quality cars.
> My '90 accord 's rustproofing is very good ( still no rust in this
> humid climate ) & great 4ws, but I've found 5 minor design*flaws (
> same in other brands too ), & replaced cheapo / inefficient parts (
> manifold, plug cables, steel wheels ). Now average 14.2 km / litre of
> RON97, if 70% of trip is highway, despite its 1.3 ton weight !
> Honda has many good qualities, but design & assembly are not 100%
> perfect : my [i] starter switch failed @68800km, [ii] Mitsuba radiator
> fan motor needed oil @75900 km ( not in service schedule ) & 1 bolt @
> bottom of radiator rusted & jammed ( like no oil / grease was used on
> bolts during assembly ) [iii] left rear wheel bearing too lacked
> grease & whined by 65000 km.
>
>
>

Every new Honda off the truck needs an alignment. 1 Acura and 3 new Hondas
for me and every one had a screwed up alignment.

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"Nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns958FCD5A3ADE3XZLKJOIDUKLJ098098@24.24.2.16 7...
> "TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in news:417fd871_1@news.tm.net.my:
>
> >| a reputation for making high quality cars.
> > My '90 accord 's rustproofing is very good ( still no rust in this
> > humid climate ) & great 4ws, but I've found 5 minor design*flaws (
> > same in other brands too ), & replaced cheapo / inefficient parts (
> > manifold, plug cables, steel wheels ). Now average 14.2 km / litre of
> > RON97, if 70% of trip is highway, despite its 1.3 ton weight !
> > Honda has many good qualities, but design & assembly are not 100%
> > perfect : my [i] starter switch failed @68800km, [ii] Mitsuba radiator
> > fan motor needed oil @75900 km ( not in service schedule ) & 1 bolt @
> > bottom of radiator rusted & jammed ( like no oil / grease was used on
> > bolts during assembly ) [iii] left rear wheel bearing too lacked
> > grease & whined by 65000 km.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Every new Honda off the truck needs an alignment. 1 Acura and 3 new
Hondas
> for me and every one had a screwed up alignment.

Then why do you keep purchasing them?

J. Perry

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"Nobody" <nobody@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:Xns958FCD5A3ADE3XZLKJOIDUKLJ098098@24.24.2.16 7...
> "TE Cheah" <no@spam.biz> wrote in news:417fd871_1@news.tm.net.my:
>
> >| a reputation for making high quality cars.
> > My '90 accord 's rustproofing is very good ( still no rust in this
> > humid climate ) & great 4ws, but I've found 5 minor design*flaws (
> > same in other brands too ), & replaced cheapo / inefficient parts (
> > manifold, plug cables, steel wheels ). Now average 14.2 km / litre of
> > RON97, if 70% of trip is highway, despite its 1.3 ton weight !
> > Honda has many good qualities, but design & assembly are not 100%
> > perfect : my [i] starter switch failed @68800km, [ii] Mitsuba radiator
> > fan motor needed oil @75900 km ( not in service schedule ) & 1 bolt @
> > bottom of radiator rusted & jammed ( like no oil / grease was used on
> > bolts during assembly ) [iii] left rear wheel bearing too lacked
> > grease & whined by 65000 km.
> >
> >
> >
>
> Every new Honda off the truck needs an alignment. 1 Acura and 3 new
Hondas
> for me and every one had a screwed up alignment.

Then why do you keep purchasing them?

J. Perry

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:

98 foot camaro?
the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.

hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?



--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:

98 foot camaro?
the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.

hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?



--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/m2/

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

now that you mention it, yes, this is troubling. i am so disappointed
in the US school system, and this 98 foot camaro is a classic victim.
poor guy.

he is such a good sport for exposing his ignorance to this ng, this is
getting fun.

hehe...


On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:01:12 GMT, "bob zee" <cam509@linuxmail.org>
wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:
>
>98 foot camaro?
>the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.
>
>hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

now that you mention it, yes, this is troubling. i am so disappointed
in the US school system, and this 98 foot camaro is a classic victim.
poor guy.

he is such a good sport for exposing his ignorance to this ng, this is
getting fun.

hehe...


On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:01:12 GMT, "bob zee" <cam509@linuxmail.org>
wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:
>
>98 foot camaro?
>the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.
>
>hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

now that you mention it, yes, this is troubling. i am so disappointed
in the US school system, and this 98 foot camaro is a classic victim.
poor guy.

he is such a good sport for exposing his ignorance to this ng, this is
getting fun.

hehe...


On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:01:12 GMT, "bob zee" <cam509@linuxmail.org>
wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:
>
>98 foot camaro?
>the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.
>
>hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

now that you mention it, yes, this is troubling. i am so disappointed
in the US school system, and this 98 foot camaro is a classic victim.
poor guy.

he is such a good sport for exposing his ignorance to this ng, this is
getting fun.

hehe...


On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 02:01:12 GMT, "bob zee" <cam509@linuxmail.org>
wrote:

>On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:
>
>98 foot camaro?
>the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.
>
>hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"bob zee" <cam509@linuxmail.org> wrote in message
news:opsgj476mf5badrm@torker2.workgroup...
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> 98 foot camaro?
> the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.
>
> hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?

I just considered the source, and disregarded anything it had to say.
Because it's ramblings have no basis for reason {;^)

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"bob zee" <cam509@linuxmail.org> wrote in message
news:opsgj476mf5badrm@torker2.workgroup...
> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 00:05:16 -0500, 98' Camaro <icruzn@webtv.net> wrote:
>
> 98 foot camaro?
> the apostrophe behind the number indicates FEET.
>
> hello? am i the only one that is bothered by this?

I just considered the source, and disregarded anything it had to say.
Because it's ramblings have no basis for reason {;^)

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"J. Perry" <j_perry@musicians.net> wrote in news:10o0j63kn83dk31
@corp.supernews.com:

>> Every new Honda off the truck needs an alignment. 1 Acura and 3 new
> Hondas for me and every one had a screwed up alignment.
>
> Then why do you keep purchasing them?

Did I say an alignment didn't fix the problem?

Re: Hondas SUCK!
 

"J. Perry" <j_perry@musicians.net> wrote in news:10o0j63kn83dk31
@corp.supernews.com:

>> Every new Honda off the truck needs an alignment. 1 Acura and 3 new
> Hondas for me and every one had a screwed up alignment.
>
> Then why do you keep purchasing them?

Did I say an alignment didn't fix the problem?