|
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:53:33 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>The car that came in first place in the comparison test was the Honda Fit >Sport. It actully "sailed through the lane change test 6 mph faster than a >Corvette Z06." Must have been the speed bumps. J. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
On Sun, 09 Apr 2006 13:53:33 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>The car that came in first place in the comparison test was the Honda Fit >Sport. It actully "sailed through the lane change test 6 mph faster than a >Corvette Z06." Must have been the speed bumps. J. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
> I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if > an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular > Mechanics magazine--I subscribe to both of them. I have read a lot about > the hydrogen fuel cells and it's obvious that it's a stupid idea. They are > not cost effective. It takes huge amounts of energy to produce a fuel > cell. I'm sure that someone will disagree with me. > Jason > > -- Jason, For your information the Nuclear Batteries are only a concept that I was introduced by world renouned psychic "Sylvia Brown". She regularly appears on the Montel Williams show. The Nuclear Batteries are mearly an idea that was brought forth through "Metaphysics". Sylvia believes that at this very moment there are Aliens out there that have been observing us. Since the very begining. At some time in the future they will step in and introduce Nuclear Batteries for our motorized transportation as a replacement for the Internal Combustion engine. Since burning fossil fuels to survive becomes too problematic so much to say the least. Go check out the "Metaphisics" section at your local Barnes and Nobels or Borders book store. Sylvia Brown has a host of books that she's already sold hundreds of thousands of copies. Research it and take it for what it's worth. I personaly take most of her preaching as truth/prophecy. It only makes so much sense what she writes about. And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward to the public is the truth. O3- |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
> I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if > an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular > Mechanics magazine--I subscribe to both of them. I have read a lot about > the hydrogen fuel cells and it's obvious that it's a stupid idea. They are > not cost effective. It takes huge amounts of energy to produce a fuel > cell. I'm sure that someone will disagree with me. > Jason > > -- Jason, For your information the Nuclear Batteries are only a concept that I was introduced by world renouned psychic "Sylvia Brown". She regularly appears on the Montel Williams show. The Nuclear Batteries are mearly an idea that was brought forth through "Metaphysics". Sylvia believes that at this very moment there are Aliens out there that have been observing us. Since the very begining. At some time in the future they will step in and introduce Nuclear Batteries for our motorized transportation as a replacement for the Internal Combustion engine. Since burning fossil fuels to survive becomes too problematic so much to say the least. Go check out the "Metaphisics" section at your local Barnes and Nobels or Borders book store. Sylvia Brown has a host of books that she's already sold hundreds of thousands of copies. Research it and take it for what it's worth. I personaly take most of her preaching as truth/prophecy. It only makes so much sense what she writes about. And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward to the public is the truth. O3- |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
In article <1144849220.727730.5370@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.c om>,
twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com wrote: > > I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if > > an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular > > Mechanics magazine--I subscribe to both of them. I have read a lot about > > the hydrogen fuel cells and it's obvious that it's a stupid idea. They are > > not cost effective. It takes huge amounts of energy to produce a fuel > > cell. I'm sure that someone will disagree with me. > > Jason > > > > -- > > > Jason, For your information the Nuclear Batteries are only a concept > that I was introduced by world renouned psychic "Sylvia Brown". She > regularly appears on the Montel Williams show. > > The Nuclear Batteries are mearly an idea that was brought forth through > "Metaphysics". Sylvia believes that at this very moment there are > Aliens out there that have been observing us. Since the very begining. > At some time in the future they will step in and introduce Nuclear > Batteries for our motorized transportation as a replacement for the > Internal Combustion engine. Since burning fossil fuels to survive > becomes too problematic so much to say the least. > > Go check out the "Metaphisics" section at your local Barnes and Nobels > or Borders book store. Sylvia Brown has a host of books that she's > already sold hundreds of thousands of copies. > > Research it and take it for what it's worth. I personaly take most of > her preaching as truth/prophecy. It only makes so much sense what she > writes about. And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward > to the public is the truth. Hello, Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to produce hydrogen fuel cells. Jason -- NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice. We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
In article <1144849220.727730.5370@z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.c om>,
twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com wrote: > > I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if > > an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular > > Mechanics magazine--I subscribe to both of them. I have read a lot about > > the hydrogen fuel cells and it's obvious that it's a stupid idea. They are > > not cost effective. It takes huge amounts of energy to produce a fuel > > cell. I'm sure that someone will disagree with me. > > Jason > > > > -- > > > Jason, For your information the Nuclear Batteries are only a concept > that I was introduced by world renouned psychic "Sylvia Brown". She > regularly appears on the Montel Williams show. > > The Nuclear Batteries are mearly an idea that was brought forth through > "Metaphysics". Sylvia believes that at this very moment there are > Aliens out there that have been observing us. Since the very begining. > At some time in the future they will step in and introduce Nuclear > Batteries for our motorized transportation as a replacement for the > Internal Combustion engine. Since burning fossil fuels to survive > becomes too problematic so much to say the least. > > Go check out the "Metaphisics" section at your local Barnes and Nobels > or Borders book store. Sylvia Brown has a host of books that she's > already sold hundreds of thousands of copies. > > Research it and take it for what it's worth. I personaly take most of > her preaching as truth/prophecy. It only makes so much sense what she > writes about. And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward > to the public is the truth. Hello, Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to produce hydrogen fuel cells. Jason -- NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice. We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
U R 2 Funny :-)
twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com wrote: >>I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if >>an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular >>Mechanics magazine--I subscribe to both of them. I have read a lot about >>the hydrogen fuel cells and it's obvious that it's a stupid idea. They are >>not cost effective. It takes huge amounts of energy to produce a fuel >>cell. I'm sure that someone will disagree with me. >>Jason >> >>-- > > > > Jason, For your information the Nuclear Batteries are only a concept > that I was introduced by world renouned psychic "Sylvia Brown". She > regularly appears on the Montel Williams show. > > The Nuclear Batteries are mearly an idea that was brought forth through > "Metaphysics". Sylvia believes that at this very moment there are > Aliens out there that have been observing us. Since the very begining. > At some time in the future they will step in and introduce Nuclear > Batteries for our motorized transportation as a replacement for the > Internal Combustion engine. Since burning fossil fuels to survive > becomes too problematic so much to say the least. > > Go check out the "Metaphisics" section at your local Barnes and Nobels > or Borders book store. Sylvia Brown has a host of books that she's > already sold hundreds of thousands of copies. > > Research it and take it for what it's worth. I personaly take most of > her preaching as truth/prophecy. It only makes so much sense what she > writes about. And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward > to the public is the truth. > > > O3- > -- PC Paul 89 PC800 77 R100RS Trip pics at: http://photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart "To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society" - Theodore Roosevelt |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
U R 2 Funny :-)
twothousandtwoto2007@yahoo.com wrote: >>I have not read yet read about those nuclear batteries but will do so if >>an article appears about them in Car and Driver magazine or Popular >>Mechanics magazine--I subscribe to both of them. I have read a lot about >>the hydrogen fuel cells and it's obvious that it's a stupid idea. They are >>not cost effective. It takes huge amounts of energy to produce a fuel >>cell. I'm sure that someone will disagree with me. >>Jason >> >>-- > > > > Jason, For your information the Nuclear Batteries are only a concept > that I was introduced by world renouned psychic "Sylvia Brown". She > regularly appears on the Montel Williams show. > > The Nuclear Batteries are mearly an idea that was brought forth through > "Metaphysics". Sylvia believes that at this very moment there are > Aliens out there that have been observing us. Since the very begining. > At some time in the future they will step in and introduce Nuclear > Batteries for our motorized transportation as a replacement for the > Internal Combustion engine. Since burning fossil fuels to survive > becomes too problematic so much to say the least. > > Go check out the "Metaphisics" section at your local Barnes and Nobels > or Borders book store. Sylvia Brown has a host of books that she's > already sold hundreds of thousands of copies. > > Research it and take it for what it's worth. I personaly take most of > her preaching as truth/prophecy. It only makes so much sense what she > writes about. And deep down inside I know that what she brings forward > to the public is the truth. > > > O3- > -- PC Paul 89 PC800 77 R100RS Trip pics at: http://photos.yahoo.com/paul1cart "To educate a man in mind and not in morals is to educate a menace to society" - Theodore Roosevelt |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:03 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>Hello, >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles >about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". >I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells >are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate >oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place >of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots >of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to >produce hydrogen fuel cells. Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective solution. After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind. They are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it a big endorsement. I don't think they are going to go for nuclear batteries ;-] |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:03 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>Hello, >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles >about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". >I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells >are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate >oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place >of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots >of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to >produce hydrogen fuel cells. Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective solution. After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind. They are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it a big endorsement. I don't think they are going to go for nuclear batteries ;-] |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
In article <jrmr32hollo2s77e42drt87025qebe4po3@4ax.com>, Gordon McGrew
<RgEmMcOgVrEew@mindspring.com> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:03 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > >Hello, > >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles > >about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". > >I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells > >are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate > >oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place > >of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots > >of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to > >produce hydrogen fuel cells. > > Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective > solution. After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind. They > are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it > a big endorsement. I don't think they are going to go for nuclear > batteries ;-] I agree. The liberals in both houses of Congress would NEVER allow nuclear batteries to be produced. Perhaps they should use a different name for them such as "green battery" or "Enviromental Battery". That's why they use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. They knew that no one would vote against a bill entitled, "No Child Left Behind" even if it was a stupid bill. Jason -- NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice. We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
In article <jrmr32hollo2s77e42drt87025qebe4po3@4ax.com>, Gordon McGrew
<RgEmMcOgVrEew@mindspring.com> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:03 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > >Hello, > >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any articles > >about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". > >I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells > >are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate > >oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place > >of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots > >of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to > >produce hydrogen fuel cells. > > Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective > solution. After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind. They > are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it > a big endorsement. I don't think they are going to go for nuclear > batteries ;-] I agree. The liberals in both houses of Congress would NEVER allow nuclear batteries to be produced. Perhaps they should use a different name for them such as "green battery" or "Enviromental Battery". That's why they use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. They knew that no one would vote against a bill entitled, "No Child Left Behind" even if it was a stupid bill. Jason -- NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice. We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:52:07 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>In article <jrmr32hollo2s77e42drt87025qebe4po3@4ax.com>, Gordon McGrew ><RgEmMcOgVrEew@mindspring.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:03 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: >> >> >Hello, >> >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any >articles >> >about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". >> >I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells >> >are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate >> >oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place >> >of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots >> >of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to >> >produce hydrogen fuel cells. >> >> Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective >> solution. After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind. They >> are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it >> a big endorsement. I don't think they are going to go for nuclear >> batteries ;-] > >I agree. The liberals in both houses of Congress would NEVER allow >nuclear batteries to be produced. Perhaps they should use a different >name for them such as "green battery" or "Enviromental Battery". That's >why they use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. They knew >that no one would vote against a bill entitled, "No Child Left Behind" >even if it was a stupid bill. >Jason I assume you mean politicians not liberals use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. That term is a Bush initiative. Some other gems from Bush/GOP: The Clear Skies Initiative allows coal plants to delay installation of emissions control equipment. The Patriot Act allows government to spy on you. The Healthy Forest Initiative allows more logging. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:52:07 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote:
>In article <jrmr32hollo2s77e42drt87025qebe4po3@4ax.com>, Gordon McGrew ><RgEmMcOgVrEew@mindspring.com> wrote: > >> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:03 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: >> >> >Hello, >> >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any >articles >> >about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". >> >I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells >> >are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate >> >oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place >> >of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots >> >of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to >> >produce hydrogen fuel cells. >> >> Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective >> solution. After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind. They >> are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it >> a big endorsement. I don't think they are going to go for nuclear >> batteries ;-] > >I agree. The liberals in both houses of Congress would NEVER allow >nuclear batteries to be produced. Perhaps they should use a different >name for them such as "green battery" or "Enviromental Battery". That's >why they use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. They knew >that no one would vote against a bill entitled, "No Child Left Behind" >even if it was a stupid bill. >Jason I assume you mean politicians not liberals use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. That term is a Bush initiative. Some other gems from Bush/GOP: The Clear Skies Initiative allows coal plants to delay installation of emissions control equipment. The Patriot Act allows government to spy on you. The Healthy Forest Initiative allows more logging. |
Re: Kiss of death for GM and perhaps Ford
In article <f2cv32d9scnnvdbkbs6e1hv63i3q8kfrau@4ax.com>, Gordon McGrew
<RgEmMcOgVrEew@mindspring.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 07:52:07 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > > >In article <jrmr32hollo2s77e42drt87025qebe4po3@4ax.com>, Gordon McGrew > ><RgEmMcOgVrEew@mindspring.com> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 10:26:03 -0700, jason@nospam.com (Jason) wrote: > >> > >> >Hello, > >> >Thanks for the information. Now I understand why I have not seen any > >articles > >> >about the Nuclear Batteries in "Car and Driver" and "Popular Mechanics". > >> >I was shocked that there were no posts indicating that hydrogen fuel cells > >> >are the solution to all of the world's problems. Many liberals that hate > >> >oil and gas seem to believe that hydrogen fuel cells will take the place > >> >of gasoline in the years to come. Those people don't realize that lots > >> >of energy (such as from coal fueled power plants) needs to be used to > >> >produce hydrogen fuel cells. > >> > >> Most liberals I know think conservation is the most effective > >> solution. After that, renewable sources such as solar and wind. They > >> are pretty skeptical about hydrogen - even more so after Bush gave it > >> a big endorsement. I don't think they are going to go for nuclear > >> batteries ;-] > > > >I agree. The liberals in both houses of Congress would NEVER allow > >nuclear batteries to be produced. Perhaps they should use a different > >name for them such as "green battery" or "Enviromental Battery". That's > >why they use terms like "No Child Left Behind" on the bills. They knew > >that no one would vote against a bill entitled, "No Child Left Behind" > >even if it was a stupid bill. > >Jason > > I assume you mean politicians not liberals use terms like "No Child > Left Behind" on the bills. That term is a Bush initiative. > > Some other gems from Bush/GOP: > > The Clear Skies Initiative allows coal plants to delay installation of > emissions control equipment. > > The Patriot Act allows government to spy on you. > > The Healthy Forest Initiative allows more logging. The Republicans and Democrats--liberal or conservative--use that trick. -- NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice. We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:51 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands