Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed
if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering your car. I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. The maximum negative camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. Is that going to require an alignment? I'm wondering if changing camber values has an effect on your toe. Alignment service is expensive, and my budget is tight. And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the understeer... |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1156979707.119430.53050@i3g2000cwc.googlegrou ps.com... > I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering your > car. I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. > > Is that going to require an alignment? I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... > Abso-frickin-lutely will it affect your alignment, and too much negative camber will eat the insides off your tires. Get the alignment done, or, spend tons and tons on tire replacements. Spdloader |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1156979707.119430.53050@i3g2000cwc.googlegrou ps.com... > I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering your > car. I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. > > Is that going to require an alignment? I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... > Abso-frickin-lutely will it affect your alignment, and too much negative camber will eat the insides off your tires. Get the alignment done, or, spend tons and tons on tire replacements. Spdloader |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1156979707.119430.53050@i3g2000cwc.googlegrou ps.com... > I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering your > car. I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. > > Is that going to require an alignment? I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... > Abso-frickin-lutely will it affect your alignment, and too much negative camber will eat the insides off your tires. Get the alignment done, or, spend tons and tons on tire replacements. Spdloader |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1156979707.119430.53050@i3g2000cwc.googlegrou ps.com: > I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering > your car. Correct. > I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. Macpherson struts do not have damper pinch bolts. Why on earth you would want to mess with your camber I cannot imagine. > The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. You racing this thing? > > Is that going to require an alignment? Well, yeah. > I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Yes it does, since you have positive caster. > Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. Then don't mess with it. ANY alteration of some aspects of your geometry will require verification of the other ones. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... You have it quite backwards here, which clearly indicates your misunderstanding of the issues at hand. Understeer is a product of your REAR suspension setup. Since you initially mentioned a "pinch bolt", this suggests a pre-Macpherson vehicle (pre-'00), and thus one with an independent rear suspension. Rear toe on such cars is positive, and rear camber is negative. Honda wished to bestow directional stability on users of the public road who may not have the sort of training F1 drivers have. Should you be stupid enough to want to reduce understeer on a road car, all you need to do is make your rear toe zero, which is easily done without the installation of new parts. What will then result is highly entertaining behavior in turns. You insurance company may notlike it, and neither will you once you find out what it will cost you... -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1156979707.119430.53050@i3g2000cwc.googlegrou ps.com: > I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering > your car. Correct. > I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. Macpherson struts do not have damper pinch bolts. Why on earth you would want to mess with your camber I cannot imagine. > The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. You racing this thing? > > Is that going to require an alignment? Well, yeah. > I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Yes it does, since you have positive caster. > Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. Then don't mess with it. ANY alteration of some aspects of your geometry will require verification of the other ones. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... You have it quite backwards here, which clearly indicates your misunderstanding of the issues at hand. Understeer is a product of your REAR suspension setup. Since you initially mentioned a "pinch bolt", this suggests a pre-Macpherson vehicle (pre-'00), and thus one with an independent rear suspension. Rear toe on such cars is positive, and rear camber is negative. Honda wished to bestow directional stability on users of the public road who may not have the sort of training F1 drivers have. Should you be stupid enough to want to reduce understeer on a road car, all you need to do is make your rear toe zero, which is easily done without the installation of new parts. What will then result is highly entertaining behavior in turns. You insurance company may notlike it, and neither will you once you find out what it will cost you... -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1156979707.119430.53050@i3g2000cwc.googlegrou ps.com: > I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering > your car. Correct. > I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. Macpherson struts do not have damper pinch bolts. Why on earth you would want to mess with your camber I cannot imagine. > The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. You racing this thing? > > Is that going to require an alignment? Well, yeah. > I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Yes it does, since you have positive caster. > Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. Then don't mess with it. ANY alteration of some aspects of your geometry will require verification of the other ones. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... You have it quite backwards here, which clearly indicates your misunderstanding of the issues at hand. Understeer is a product of your REAR suspension setup. Since you initially mentioned a "pinch bolt", this suggests a pre-Macpherson vehicle (pre-'00), and thus one with an independent rear suspension. Rear toe on such cars is positive, and rear camber is negative. Honda wished to bestow directional stability on users of the public road who may not have the sort of training F1 drivers have. Should you be stupid enough to want to reduce understeer on a road car, all you need to do is make your rear toe zero, which is easily done without the installation of new parts. What will then result is highly entertaining behavior in turns. You insurance company may notlike it, and neither will you once you find out what it will cost you... -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
televascular wrote:
> I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering your > car. I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. > > Is that going to require an alignment? I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... > what kind of car? if it's a taurus, you're wasting your time. in my highly biased opinion, if you have mcphersons, you're wasting your time. if you're talking integra, you don't have mcphersons. replacing the damper pinch bolts? what kind of car? alignment? what kind of car? understeer? what kind of car? |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
televascular wrote:
> I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering your > car. I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. > > Is that going to require an alignment? I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... > what kind of car? if it's a taurus, you're wasting your time. in my highly biased opinion, if you have mcphersons, you're wasting your time. if you're talking integra, you don't have mcphersons. replacing the damper pinch bolts? what kind of car? alignment? what kind of car? understeer? what kind of car? |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
televascular wrote:
> I've always read that you should get a four-wheel alignment performed > if you make major changes to suspension geometry, such as lowering your > car. I am planning on buying camber adjusters for my front wheels; they > replace the damper pinch bolts on the MacPhersons. The maximum negative > camber I can set is 1.75 degrees, which I will be doing. > > Is that going to require an alignment? I'm wondering if changing camber > values has an effect on your toe. Alignment service is expensive, and > my budget is tight. > > And hopefully, having some negative camber up front will help with the > understeer... > what kind of car? if it's a taurus, you're wasting your time. in my highly biased opinion, if you have mcphersons, you're wasting your time. if you're talking integra, you don't have mcphersons. replacing the damper pinch bolts? what kind of car? alignment? what kind of car? understeer? what kind of car? |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
TeGGeR®,
I have the 2006 Civic Si Coupe, with MacPhersons up front and independent double wishbone in the back. The Helms OEM service manual specifies them as "damper pinch bolts", but maybe we are talking about two different things. While this car is not being prepped for autocross, I live in an area with long, curvaceous roads with above-average speed limits. I enjoy driving my cars fast and hard, somewhat dangling on the border of recklessness. I understand that a car with understeer is more predictable and intuitive than a car with oversteer/neutral steering capability, which is why most production cars understeer by default. However, I'd like to achieve neutral-ness and then force myself to adapt, as an experiment of my driving technique/vehicle capability. Saying that understeer is a product of the rear suspension setup is only a half-truth. The rear has more of an effect than the front. The Si comes stock with a 1.5 LSD up front and about two degrees negative camber on the rear... and even with an aftermarket 28mm rear swaybar, I can still detect mild understeer. Increasing negative camber on the front WILL decrease understeer: as the car corners, the stroke of the suspension brings the outside wheel camber to zero, widening the tire contact patch and increasing traction. This is a step I am taking only because my other upgrades were not sufficient, but such is the way of a FF car. However, I am interested in this method of manipulating rear toe to achieve oversteer. I believe I can mess with it easily enough if its the thread-type adjustment, but I have no way of measuring the changes. Can you elaborate, or is this something I shouldn't try to do myself? |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
TeGGeR®,
I have the 2006 Civic Si Coupe, with MacPhersons up front and independent double wishbone in the back. The Helms OEM service manual specifies them as "damper pinch bolts", but maybe we are talking about two different things. While this car is not being prepped for autocross, I live in an area with long, curvaceous roads with above-average speed limits. I enjoy driving my cars fast and hard, somewhat dangling on the border of recklessness. I understand that a car with understeer is more predictable and intuitive than a car with oversteer/neutral steering capability, which is why most production cars understeer by default. However, I'd like to achieve neutral-ness and then force myself to adapt, as an experiment of my driving technique/vehicle capability. Saying that understeer is a product of the rear suspension setup is only a half-truth. The rear has more of an effect than the front. The Si comes stock with a 1.5 LSD up front and about two degrees negative camber on the rear... and even with an aftermarket 28mm rear swaybar, I can still detect mild understeer. Increasing negative camber on the front WILL decrease understeer: as the car corners, the stroke of the suspension brings the outside wheel camber to zero, widening the tire contact patch and increasing traction. This is a step I am taking only because my other upgrades were not sufficient, but such is the way of a FF car. However, I am interested in this method of manipulating rear toe to achieve oversteer. I believe I can mess with it easily enough if its the thread-type adjustment, but I have no way of measuring the changes. Can you elaborate, or is this something I shouldn't try to do myself? |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
TeGGeR®,
I have the 2006 Civic Si Coupe, with MacPhersons up front and independent double wishbone in the back. The Helms OEM service manual specifies them as "damper pinch bolts", but maybe we are talking about two different things. While this car is not being prepped for autocross, I live in an area with long, curvaceous roads with above-average speed limits. I enjoy driving my cars fast and hard, somewhat dangling on the border of recklessness. I understand that a car with understeer is more predictable and intuitive than a car with oversteer/neutral steering capability, which is why most production cars understeer by default. However, I'd like to achieve neutral-ness and then force myself to adapt, as an experiment of my driving technique/vehicle capability. Saying that understeer is a product of the rear suspension setup is only a half-truth. The rear has more of an effect than the front. The Si comes stock with a 1.5 LSD up front and about two degrees negative camber on the rear... and even with an aftermarket 28mm rear swaybar, I can still detect mild understeer. Increasing negative camber on the front WILL decrease understeer: as the car corners, the stroke of the suspension brings the outside wheel camber to zero, widening the tire contact patch and increasing traction. This is a step I am taking only because my other upgrades were not sufficient, but such is the way of a FF car. However, I am interested in this method of manipulating rear toe to achieve oversteer. I believe I can mess with it easily enough if its the thread-type adjustment, but I have no way of measuring the changes. Can you elaborate, or is this something I shouldn't try to do myself? |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1156991839.326753.138110@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com: <snip> > > However, I am interested in this method of manipulating rear toe to > achieve oversteer. I believe I can mess with it easily enough if its > the thread-type adjustment, but I have no way of measuring the changes. > Can you elaborate, or is this something I shouldn't try to do myself? > > You certainly seem to have an abundance of suspension knowledge. Why ask here? Just do what you so obviously know already. -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
Re: Need Alignment After Camber Adjustment?
"televascular" <televascular@yahoo.com> wrote in
news:1156991839.326753.138110@e3g2000cwe.googlegro ups.com: <snip> > > However, I am interested in this method of manipulating rear toe to > achieve oversteer. I believe I can mess with it easily enough if its > the thread-type adjustment, but I have no way of measuring the changes. > Can you elaborate, or is this something I shouldn't try to do myself? > > You certainly seem to have an abundance of suspension knowledge. Why ask here? Just do what you so obviously know already. -- TeGGeR® The Unofficial Honda/Acura FAQ www.tegger.com/hondafaq/ |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands