becida

"Dave Dodson" <ddodson@gci.net> wrote in message
news:vslv2tofn69f45@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > Just about cheaper to replace the whole shaft with a rebuilt... when you
> > figure the time it takes to actually put a new boot on.
> >
> > Rob
>
> If the cv joint itself is damaged it is cheaper and easier to replace the
cv
> shaft. Parts for the joint rebuild usually cost more than the entire
> (remanufactured axle) and the labor involved is significantly less also.
> While I worked at an automotive shop, it was always our suggestion to do
the
> whole axle when we found that the joint was bad. Of course, this does not
> apply where only the boot is being replaced.
>
> Dave D
>

As I recall it's about $130 for a reman whole shaft & that comes with a
guarantee. I guess it depends on the cost of the labor to take the joint
off, clean, inspect, lube and put it back on the shaft with a new boot.
The labor for taking the drive shaft out and putting it back is the same
either way.

Rob

becida

"Dave Dodson" <ddodson@gci.net> wrote in message
news:vslv2tofn69f45@corp.supernews.com...
> > >
> > Just about cheaper to replace the whole shaft with a rebuilt... when you
> > figure the time it takes to actually put a new boot on.
> >
> > Rob
>
> If the cv joint itself is damaged it is cheaper and easier to replace the
cv
> shaft. Parts for the joint rebuild usually cost more than the entire
> (remanufactured axle) and the labor involved is significantly less also.
> While I worked at an automotive shop, it was always our suggestion to do
the
> whole axle when we found that the joint was bad. Of course, this does not
> apply where only the boot is being replaced.
>
> Dave D
>

As I recall it's about $130 for a reman whole shaft & that comes with a
guarantee. I guess it depends on the cost of the labor to take the joint
off, clean, inspect, lube and put it back on the shaft with a new boot.
The labor for taking the drive shaft out and putting it back is the same
either way.

Rob

Becker

There are boots made of plastic which are like a clam. You clean the
joint replace the grease, glue shut the new boot and clamp it.
Disadvantage from my experience, they don't last as long as the rubber
ones. I don't remember the manufacturer but I got mine from Pep Boys.
As far as I know, the biggest enemy of rubber boots is ozone which also
dries out the brake and fuel hoses. You might want to try covering the
boot with liquid silicone, the one used to seal the rubber window
frames. I never tried it so I don't know if it might work or is just a
waste of money. Before applying it, the boot should be very clean.

rjdriver wrote:

>
> The problem with CV joint and boot maintenence is that most boots are
> made tubular and thus become very labor intensive to replace. A boot that
> could be taken off simply by removing the clamps on either end would then
> become a regular maintenance item you replace very so many miles based on
> the estimated life of the rubber, driving conditions, etc. This would also
> allow regreasing of the joint itself if necessary, and probably make CV
> joints last the life of the vehicle.
>

Becker

There are boots made of plastic which are like a clam. You clean the
joint replace the grease, glue shut the new boot and clamp it.
Disadvantage from my experience, they don't last as long as the rubber
ones. I don't remember the manufacturer but I got mine from Pep Boys.
As far as I know, the biggest enemy of rubber boots is ozone which also
dries out the brake and fuel hoses. You might want to try covering the
boot with liquid silicone, the one used to seal the rubber window
frames. I never tried it so I don't know if it might work or is just a
waste of money. Before applying it, the boot should be very clean.

rjdriver wrote:

>
> The problem with CV joint and boot maintenence is that most boots are
> made tubular and thus become very labor intensive to replace. A boot that
> could be taken off simply by removing the clamps on either end would then
> become a regular maintenance item you replace very so many miles based on
> the estimated life of the rubber, driving conditions, etc. This would also
> allow regreasing of the joint itself if necessary, and probably make CV
> joints last the life of the vehicle.
>

Becker

There are boots made of plastic which are like a clam. You clean the
joint replace the grease, glue shut the new boot and clamp it.
Disadvantage from my experience, they don't last as long as the rubber
ones. I don't remember the manufacturer but I got mine from Pep Boys.
As far as I know, the biggest enemy of rubber boots is ozone which also
dries out the brake and fuel hoses. You might want to try covering the
boot with liquid silicone, the one used to seal the rubber window
frames. I never tried it so I don't know if it might work or is just a
waste of money. Before applying it, the boot should be very clean.

rjdriver wrote:

>
> The problem with CV joint and boot maintenence is that most boots are
> made tubular and thus become very labor intensive to replace. A boot that
> could be taken off simply by removing the clamps on either end would then
> become a regular maintenance item you replace very so many miles based on
> the estimated life of the rubber, driving conditions, etc. This would also
> allow regreasing of the joint itself if necessary, and probably make CV
> joints last the life of the vehicle.
>

Becker

There are boots made of plastic which are like a clam. You clean the
joint replace the grease, glue shut the new boot and clamp it.
Disadvantage from my experience, they don't last as long as the rubber
ones. I don't remember the manufacturer but I got mine from Pep Boys.
As far as I know, the biggest enemy of rubber boots is ozone which also
dries out the brake and fuel hoses. You might want to try covering the
boot with liquid silicone, the one used to seal the rubber window
frames. I never tried it so I don't know if it might work or is just a
waste of money. Before applying it, the boot should be very clean.

rjdriver wrote:

>
> The problem with CV joint and boot maintenence is that most boots are
> made tubular and thus become very labor intensive to replace. A boot that
> could be taken off simply by removing the clamps on either end would then
> become a regular maintenance item you replace very so many miles based on
> the estimated life of the rubber, driving conditions, etc. This would also
> allow regreasing of the joint itself if necessary, and probably make CV
> joints last the life of the vehicle.
>

Dave Dodson

--
Hunt hard...Kill quick...Offer No Apologies!
"becida" <becida@juno.com> wrote in message
news:vsn0oldkqgb765@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Dave Dodson" <ddodson@gci.net> wrote in message
> news:vslv2tofn69f45@corp.supernews.com...
> > > >
> > > Just about cheaper to replace the whole shaft with a rebuilt... when
you
> > > figure the time it takes to actually put a new boot on.
> > >
> > > Rob
> >
> > If the cv joint itself is damaged it is cheaper and easier to replace
the
> cv
> > shaft. Parts for the joint rebuild usually cost more than the entire
> > (remanufactured axle) and the labor involved is significantly less also.
> > While I worked at an automotive shop, it was always our suggestion to do
> the
> > whole axle when we found that the joint was bad. Of course, this does
not
> > apply where only the boot is being replaced.
> >
> > Dave D
> >
>
> As I recall it's about $130 for a reman whole shaft & that comes with a
> guarantee. I guess it depends on the cost of the labor to take the joint
> off, clean, inspect, lube and put it back on the shaft with a new boot.
> The labor for taking the drive shaft out and putting it back is the same
> either way.
>
> Rob

Well, Rob, while I was running the auto shop, our prices (from NAPA) ranged
from about $75-$125 for a reman shaft. Not only did the customer get a new
outer joint (usually the failed one) but also a new inner joint, new boots
(obviously), and a lifetime warranty on the whole assy (including boots).
Now mind you, this is in Alaska where the temps in winter can reach -50F or
a bit colder and NAPA would still honor the lifetime warranty on the boots.
There is one exception; 1996 Toyota Camry. NAPA carried six different axles
(rt side) for that vehicle but none fitted. I sent the axle to the local Toy
dealer and after six weeks, they were unable to come up with a replacement.
There were 13 different possibilities listed for that vehicle. The customer
took her car to them for repair in the end. I wasted about 60 manhours
chasing the part for her though. The one that comes readily to mind as an
example, was a mid 90s Honda with a bad outer right joint. The reman axle
was $95 plus labor while the joint service (rebuild kit) was $90, plus $20
for a new boot, plus labor. The labor for the two jobs is quite different.
R&R the axle is about 1-1.5hrs while the joint rebuild and replace is about
2.5-3.0 hours. We used a flat rate not an hourly rate and it was $50 to R&R
the axle and $75 to do the joint. So you can see that doing the whole cv
axle is much more cost effective, quicker, and a better warranty in the end.

Dave D
>
>

Dave Dodson

--
Hunt hard...Kill quick...Offer No Apologies!
"becida" <becida@juno.com> wrote in message
news:vsn0oldkqgb765@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Dave Dodson" <ddodson@gci.net> wrote in message
> news:vslv2tofn69f45@corp.supernews.com...
> > > >
> > > Just about cheaper to replace the whole shaft with a rebuilt... when
you
> > > figure the time it takes to actually put a new boot on.
> > >
> > > Rob
> >
> > If the cv joint itself is damaged it is cheaper and easier to replace
the
> cv
> > shaft. Parts for the joint rebuild usually cost more than the entire
> > (remanufactured axle) and the labor involved is significantly less also.
> > While I worked at an automotive shop, it was always our suggestion to do
> the
> > whole axle when we found that the joint was bad. Of course, this does
not
> > apply where only the boot is being replaced.
> >
> > Dave D
> >
>
> As I recall it's about $130 for a reman whole shaft & that comes with a
> guarantee. I guess it depends on the cost of the labor to take the joint
> off, clean, inspect, lube and put it back on the shaft with a new boot.
> The labor for taking the drive shaft out and putting it back is the same
> either way.
>
> Rob

Well, Rob, while I was running the auto shop, our prices (from NAPA) ranged
from about $75-$125 for a reman shaft. Not only did the customer get a new
outer joint (usually the failed one) but also a new inner joint, new boots
(obviously), and a lifetime warranty on the whole assy (including boots).
Now mind you, this is in Alaska where the temps in winter can reach -50F or
a bit colder and NAPA would still honor the lifetime warranty on the boots.
There is one exception; 1996 Toyota Camry. NAPA carried six different axles
(rt side) for that vehicle but none fitted. I sent the axle to the local Toy
dealer and after six weeks, they were unable to come up with a replacement.
There were 13 different possibilities listed for that vehicle. The customer
took her car to them for repair in the end. I wasted about 60 manhours
chasing the part for her though. The one that comes readily to mind as an
example, was a mid 90s Honda with a bad outer right joint. The reman axle
was $95 plus labor while the joint service (rebuild kit) was $90, plus $20
for a new boot, plus labor. The labor for the two jobs is quite different.
R&R the axle is about 1-1.5hrs while the joint rebuild and replace is about
2.5-3.0 hours. We used a flat rate not an hourly rate and it was $50 to R&R
the axle and $75 to do the joint. So you can see that doing the whole cv
axle is much more cost effective, quicker, and a better warranty in the end.

Dave D
>
>

Dave Dodson

--
Hunt hard...Kill quick...Offer No Apologies!
"becida" <becida@juno.com> wrote in message
news:vsn0oldkqgb765@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Dave Dodson" <ddodson@gci.net> wrote in message
> news:vslv2tofn69f45@corp.supernews.com...
> > > >
> > > Just about cheaper to replace the whole shaft with a rebuilt... when
you
> > > figure the time it takes to actually put a new boot on.
> > >
> > > Rob
> >
> > If the cv joint itself is damaged it is cheaper and easier to replace
the
> cv
> > shaft. Parts for the joint rebuild usually cost more than the entire
> > (remanufactured axle) and the labor involved is significantly less also.
> > While I worked at an automotive shop, it was always our suggestion to do
> the
> > whole axle when we found that the joint was bad. Of course, this does
not
> > apply where only the boot is being replaced.
> >
> > Dave D
> >
>
> As I recall it's about $130 for a reman whole shaft & that comes with a
> guarantee. I guess it depends on the cost of the labor to take the joint
> off, clean, inspect, lube and put it back on the shaft with a new boot.
> The labor for taking the drive shaft out and putting it back is the same
> either way.
>
> Rob

Well, Rob, while I was running the auto shop, our prices (from NAPA) ranged
from about $75-$125 for a reman shaft. Not only did the customer get a new
outer joint (usually the failed one) but also a new inner joint, new boots
(obviously), and a lifetime warranty on the whole assy (including boots).
Now mind you, this is in Alaska where the temps in winter can reach -50F or
a bit colder and NAPA would still honor the lifetime warranty on the boots.
There is one exception; 1996 Toyota Camry. NAPA carried six different axles
(rt side) for that vehicle but none fitted. I sent the axle to the local Toy
dealer and after six weeks, they were unable to come up with a replacement.
There were 13 different possibilities listed for that vehicle. The customer
took her car to them for repair in the end. I wasted about 60 manhours
chasing the part for her though. The one that comes readily to mind as an
example, was a mid 90s Honda with a bad outer right joint. The reman axle
was $95 plus labor while the joint service (rebuild kit) was $90, plus $20
for a new boot, plus labor. The labor for the two jobs is quite different.
R&R the axle is about 1-1.5hrs while the joint rebuild and replace is about
2.5-3.0 hours. We used a flat rate not an hourly rate and it was $50 to R&R
the axle and $75 to do the joint. So you can see that doing the whole cv
axle is much more cost effective, quicker, and a better warranty in the end.

Dave D
>
>

Dave Dodson

--
Hunt hard...Kill quick...Offer No Apologies!
"becida" <becida@juno.com> wrote in message
news:vsn0oldkqgb765@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Dave Dodson" <ddodson@gci.net> wrote in message
> news:vslv2tofn69f45@corp.supernews.com...
> > > >
> > > Just about cheaper to replace the whole shaft with a rebuilt... when
you
> > > figure the time it takes to actually put a new boot on.
> > >
> > > Rob
> >
> > If the cv joint itself is damaged it is cheaper and easier to replace
the
> cv
> > shaft. Parts for the joint rebuild usually cost more than the entire
> > (remanufactured axle) and the labor involved is significantly less also.
> > While I worked at an automotive shop, it was always our suggestion to do
> the
> > whole axle when we found that the joint was bad. Of course, this does
not
> > apply where only the boot is being replaced.
> >
> > Dave D
> >
>
> As I recall it's about $130 for a reman whole shaft & that comes with a
> guarantee. I guess it depends on the cost of the labor to take the joint
> off, clean, inspect, lube and put it back on the shaft with a new boot.
> The labor for taking the drive shaft out and putting it back is the same
> either way.
>
> Rob

Well, Rob, while I was running the auto shop, our prices (from NAPA) ranged
from about $75-$125 for a reman shaft. Not only did the customer get a new
outer joint (usually the failed one) but also a new inner joint, new boots
(obviously), and a lifetime warranty on the whole assy (including boots).
Now mind you, this is in Alaska where the temps in winter can reach -50F or
a bit colder and NAPA would still honor the lifetime warranty on the boots.
There is one exception; 1996 Toyota Camry. NAPA carried six different axles
(rt side) for that vehicle but none fitted. I sent the axle to the local Toy
dealer and after six weeks, they were unable to come up with a replacement.
There were 13 different possibilities listed for that vehicle. The customer
took her car to them for repair in the end. I wasted about 60 manhours
chasing the part for her though. The one that comes readily to mind as an
example, was a mid 90s Honda with a bad outer right joint. The reman axle
was $95 plus labor while the joint service (rebuild kit) was $90, plus $20
for a new boot, plus labor. The labor for the two jobs is quite different.
R&R the axle is about 1-1.5hrs while the joint rebuild and replace is about
2.5-3.0 hours. We used a flat rate not an hourly rate and it was $50 to R&R
the axle and $75 to do the joint. So you can see that doing the whole cv
axle is much more cost effective, quicker, and a better warranty in the end.

Dave D
>
>