We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
04-19-2006, 04:50 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
get started.
Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
Generals do a coup d'etat).
conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
get started.
Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
Generals do a coup d'etat).
04-19-2006, 05:01 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com...
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
You forget one little obstacle. The "Not in my backyard" crowd.
04-19-2006, 05:01 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com...
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
You forget one little obstacle. The "Not in my backyard" crowd.
04-19-2006, 05:01 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
news:6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com...
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
You forget one little obstacle. The "Not in my backyard" crowd.
04-19-2006, 05:01 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Better yet, you we could build fuel-efficient motor vehicles, develop
alternative sources of energy that don't cause global warming, improve the
efficiency of our houses, and use buses, subways, bikes and our feet to get
around more.
Jeff
alternative sources of energy that don't cause global warming, improve the
efficiency of our houses, and use buses, subways, bikes and our feet to get
around more.
Jeff
04-19-2006, 05:01 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Better yet, you we could build fuel-efficient motor vehicles, develop
alternative sources of energy that don't cause global warming, improve the
efficiency of our houses, and use buses, subways, bikes and our feet to get
around more.
Jeff
alternative sources of energy that don't cause global warming, improve the
efficiency of our houses, and use buses, subways, bikes and our feet to get
around more.
Jeff
04-19-2006, 05:01 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Better yet, you we could build fuel-efficient motor vehicles, develop
alternative sources of energy that don't cause global warming, improve the
efficiency of our houses, and use buses, subways, bikes and our feet to get
around more.
Jeff
alternative sources of energy that don't cause global warming, improve the
efficiency of our houses, and use buses, subways, bikes and our feet to get
around more.
Jeff
04-19-2006, 05:28 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
The first sentence turned me off right away. "people owned"? I hate
those words because it reminds me of the old U.S.S,R.
You must be a socialist.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
The first sentence turned me off right away. "people owned"? I hate
those words because it reminds me of the old U.S.S,R.
You must be a socialist.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
04-19-2006, 05:28 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
The first sentence turned me off right away. "people owned"? I hate
those words because it reminds me of the old U.S.S,R.
You must be a socialist.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
The first sentence turned me off right away. "people owned"? I hate
those words because it reminds me of the old U.S.S,R.
You must be a socialist.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
04-19-2006, 05:28 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com>,
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
The first sentence turned me off right away. "people owned"? I hate
those words because it reminds me of the old U.S.S,R.
You must be a socialist.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
The first sentence turned me off right away. "people owned"? I hate
those words because it reminds me of the old U.S.S,R.
You must be a socialist.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
04-19-2006, 05:35 PM
#11
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
>
> Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
> companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
> cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
> sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
>
> That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
> collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
> until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
> gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
> they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
> with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
> cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
>
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
The problem is that no town or city wants any type of power plant to be
built in their back yard. I live in a county that has a Nuclear Power
Plant. The liberals in this state have been trying to close down that
Nuclear Power Plant for the past 20 years. There has not been a new
Nuclear Power Plant built in the past 20 years. The reason is because
no person in America wants a Nuclear Power plant or a Coal to Oil
Conversion Plant to be built in their back yard. There is even a name
for it---NIMBY--.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
>
> Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
> companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
> cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
> sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
>
> That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
> collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
> until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
> gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
> they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
> with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
> cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
>
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
The problem is that no town or city wants any type of power plant to be
built in their back yard. I live in a county that has a Nuclear Power
Plant. The liberals in this state have been trying to close down that
Nuclear Power Plant for the past 20 years. There has not been a new
Nuclear Power Plant built in the past 20 years. The reason is because
no person in America wants a Nuclear Power plant or a Coal to Oil
Conversion Plant to be built in their back yard. There is even a name
for it---NIMBY--.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
04-19-2006, 05:35 PM
#12
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
>
> Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
> companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
> cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
> sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
>
> That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
> collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
> until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
> gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
> they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
> with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
> cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
>
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
The problem is that no town or city wants any type of power plant to be
built in their back yard. I live in a county that has a Nuclear Power
Plant. The liberals in this state have been trying to close down that
Nuclear Power Plant for the past 20 years. There has not been a new
Nuclear Power Plant built in the past 20 years. The reason is because
no person in America wants a Nuclear Power plant or a Coal to Oil
Conversion Plant to be built in their back yard. There is even a name
for it---NIMBY--.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
>
> Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
> companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
> cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
> sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
>
> That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
> collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
> until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
> gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
> they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
> with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
> cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
>
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
The problem is that no town or city wants any type of power plant to be
built in their back yard. I live in a county that has a Nuclear Power
Plant. The liberals in this state have been trying to close down that
Nuclear Power Plant for the past 20 years. There has not been a new
Nuclear Power Plant built in the past 20 years. The reason is because
no person in America wants a Nuclear Power plant or a Coal to Oil
Conversion Plant to be built in their back yard. There is even a name
for it---NIMBY--.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
04-19-2006, 05:35 PM
#13
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <6e44b58d2c244460da06f2402dd9e1da@dizum.com>, Nomen Nescio
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
>
> Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
> companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
> cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
> sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
>
> That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
> collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
> until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
> gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
> they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
> with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
> cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
>
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
The problem is that no town or city wants any type of power plant to be
built in their back yard. I live in a county that has a Nuclear Power
Plant. The liberals in this state have been trying to close down that
Nuclear Power Plant for the past 20 years. There has not been a new
Nuclear Power Plant built in the past 20 years. The reason is because
no person in America wants a Nuclear Power plant or a Coal to Oil
Conversion Plant to be built in their back yard. There is even a name
for it---NIMBY--.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
<nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant and extract as much gasoline, from domestic coal, as we
> need, independently of foreign nations. We could just about balance our
> budget just on that one item alone. Just call it Manhattan Project II and
> get started.
>
> Gasoline would be cheap and stay that way, once foreigners, greedy oil
> companies, and profits are taken out of the picture. And even if it wasn't
> cheap, its still cheap enough compared to losing our manhood to the Arab
> sheiks, Venezuelan strongman, Nigerian Mau-mau, and so on down the line.
>
> That is, if we wanted to. Call the troops home today and we will have
> collectively, $1,500,000,000.00 a month to invest in Manhattan Project II
> until its done. Put it to the vote of the people: Do they want
> gasoline-a-plenty at low cost for ourselves and generations to come, or do
> they want to see our beloved country go bankcrupt...to Hell in a handbasket
> with empty tanked SUV cars and Pickups littering the landscape and
> cemetaries full of their dead soldier-children?
>
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
The problem is that no town or city wants any type of power plant to be
built in their back yard. I live in a county that has a Nuclear Power
Plant. The liberals in this state have been trying to close down that
Nuclear Power Plant for the past 20 years. There has not been a new
Nuclear Power Plant built in the past 20 years. The reason is because
no person in America wants a Nuclear Power plant or a Coal to Oil
Conversion Plant to be built in their back yard. There is even a name
for it---NIMBY--.
Jason
--
NEWSGROUP SUBSCRIBERS MOTTO
We respect those subscribers that ask for advice or provide advice.
We do NOT respect the subscribers that enjoy criticizing people.
04-19-2006, 06:04 PM
#14
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
>
But you would still be an idiot!
I think 'people-owned' is significant... Aint no crooks in them communes,
no-sir!
Life is so simple for the simple minded...
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
>
But you would still be an idiot!
I think 'people-owned' is significant... Aint no crooks in them communes,
no-sir!
Life is so simple for the simple minded...
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
04-19-2006, 06:04 PM
#15
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> wrote:
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
>
But you would still be an idiot!
I think 'people-owned' is significant... Aint no crooks in them communes,
no-sir!
Life is so simple for the simple minded...
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!
> The People of the United States could build a people-owned coal-to-oil
> conversion plant
> I'm waiting, Mr. President. Please answer before the impeachment
> proceedings begin to put you out of the warmongering business (or the
> Generals do a coup d'etat).
>
But you would still be an idiot!
I think 'people-owned' is significant... Aint no crooks in them communes,
no-sir!
Life is so simple for the simple minded...
--
Yeh, I'm a Krusty old Geezer, putting up with my 'smartass' is the price
you pay..DEAL with it!