"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:fu6cnV00V4RgStbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Now we are getting to the crux of the problem, I never said 'oil companies
> have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
> to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
> What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
> not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a
> tax credit as a capital loss

Please demonstrate that the oil companies have burned off gasoline and
claimed it as a capital loss, then.

Jeff

>
> mike hunt
>
>
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If
>>> they can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
> .
>>
>> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles"
>> in large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>>
>>> mike hunt
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>
>

 

"The BEnevolent dbu" <Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote in message
news:Relaxand-FBD028.16094223042006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> > to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> > certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the
>> > carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to
>> follow
>> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown
>> to
>> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their
>> arguments
>> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
>> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
>> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>>
>> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples
>> of
>> each of them.
>>
>> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles"
>> in
>> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>>
>> > mike hunt
>>
>> Jeff
>
> Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
> automatically top post.

Top posting makes it harder to follow a thread.

Jeff


> My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
> with every reply.
> --
> "[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
>
> -- Vice President Al Gore

 

"The BEnevolent dbu" <Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote in message
news:Relaxand-FBD028.16094223042006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> > to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> > certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the
>> > carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to
>> follow
>> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown
>> to
>> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their
>> arguments
>> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
>> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
>> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>>
>> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples
>> of
>> each of them.
>>
>> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles"
>> in
>> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>>
>> > mike hunt
>>
>> Jeff
>
> Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
> automatically top post.

Top posting makes it harder to follow a thread.

Jeff


> My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
> with every reply.
> --
> "[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
>
> -- Vice President Al Gore

 

"The BEnevolent dbu" <Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote in message
news:Relaxand-FBD028.16094223042006@news-rdr-03.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> > to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> > certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the
>> > carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to
>> follow
>> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown
>> to
>> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their
>> arguments
>> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
>> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
>> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>>
>> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples
>> of
>> each of them.
>>
>> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles"
>> in
>> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>>
>> > mike hunt
>>
>> Jeff
>
> Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
> automatically top post.

Top posting makes it harder to follow a thread.

Jeff


> My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
> with every reply.
> --
> "[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
>
> -- Vice President Al Gore

 

I'm not claiming anything I simply asked you what was it you posted. How
do you expect somebody else to remember something you posted, after you
snipped everything several post ago to suit your bottom posting obsession,
when YOU don't even remember what you posted?


"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NOT2g.11957$i41.9943@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:e-mcnRfcVpVCRdbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted
>>I can understand why you can not prove what you said.
>
> There you go again. You said that I did not back a claim. I asked which
> one, and now you are unable to back YOUR claim.
>
> Jeff
>

 

I'm not claiming anything I simply asked you what was it you posted. How
do you expect somebody else to remember something you posted, after you
snipped everything several post ago to suit your bottom posting obsession,
when YOU don't even remember what you posted?


"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NOT2g.11957$i41.9943@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:e-mcnRfcVpVCRdbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted
>>I can understand why you can not prove what you said.
>
> There you go again. You said that I did not back a claim. I asked which
> one, and now you are unable to back YOUR claim.
>
> Jeff
>

 

I'm not claiming anything I simply asked you what was it you posted. How
do you expect somebody else to remember something you posted, after you
snipped everything several post ago to suit your bottom posting obsession,
when YOU don't even remember what you posted?


"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:NOT2g.11957$i41.9943@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:e-mcnRfcVpVCRdbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted
>>I can understand why you can not prove what you said.
>
> There you go again. You said that I did not back a claim. I asked which
> one, and now you are unable to back YOUR claim.
>
> Jeff
>

 

> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..

> Gerald



Then, ignore the thread.

Bye.


Jeff


Yup Done deal! Only because the thread is senseless. The thread had
some good content until you guys took it into space with a version of a
HOT AIR ENGINE...

Good luck...

Gerald

 

> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..

> Gerald



Then, ignore the thread.

Bye.


Jeff


Yup Done deal! Only because the thread is senseless. The thread had
some good content until you guys took it into space with a version of a
HOT AIR ENGINE...

Good luck...

Gerald

 

> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..

> Gerald



Then, ignore the thread.

Bye.


Jeff


Yup Done deal! Only because the thread is senseless. The thread had
some good content until you guys took it into space with a version of a
HOT AIR ENGINE...

Good luck...

Gerald

 

hi, its just all crap, . the government knows that we CANNOT
live/survive without gasoline, so they come up with the bullcrap that
supplys are getting shorter etc..... so that they can hijak the oil prices.
australia produces gasoline , but some how we here mysteriously dont
use it , cause if there is anything happening in the world , the gov
goes " due to %^$$^$%&^%$^%$ the price of petrol has to go up "

how come petrol , one week is $ 1.28 a litre then something happens
in the world and petrol goes up 10 cents ??
what about the petrol that was in the tanks at the stations for 1.28 , .
why doesnt the petrol that was in the tanks stay at 1.28 , cause they got
it at the cheaper price , why dont they use that up then put more petrol
in at the dearer price.

there is no way teh petrol companies will allow a extremely high mileage
per litre petrol engine to be produced. that means they will sell less
fuel , what about the people taht have designed these engines , and teh
petrol compaines brought them out or hasseld em ?

another example of governments bullshit is teh cyclones taht went thru
innasvale , queensland , and ruined some bananna crops, because of that
they say prices of bannanas will go from 14$ a box to 40$
they make it sound like innasvale was the only place taht grew bananna,
infact there are 4 other places near by taht where untouched by teh
cyclone taht grew banannas, plus there are another 13 major places in
australia that grow alot more bannans than innasvale, its just all
bullshit.

mark k
what has that got to do with the petrol we produce here in australia?
"Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in message
news:nN6dnZO215O_HtrZ4p2dnA@sedona.net...
> Go for it. That will keep you too busy to troll.
>
> Mike
>

 

hi, its just all crap, . the government knows that we CANNOT
live/survive without gasoline, so they come up with the bullcrap that
supplys are getting shorter etc..... so that they can hijak the oil prices.
australia produces gasoline , but some how we here mysteriously dont
use it , cause if there is anything happening in the world , the gov
goes " due to %^$$^$%&^%$^%$ the price of petrol has to go up "

how come petrol , one week is $ 1.28 a litre then something happens
in the world and petrol goes up 10 cents ??
what about the petrol that was in the tanks at the stations for 1.28 , .
why doesnt the petrol that was in the tanks stay at 1.28 , cause they got
it at the cheaper price , why dont they use that up then put more petrol
in at the dearer price.

there is no way teh petrol companies will allow a extremely high mileage
per litre petrol engine to be produced. that means they will sell less
fuel , what about the people taht have designed these engines , and teh
petrol compaines brought them out or hasseld em ?

another example of governments bullshit is teh cyclones taht went thru
innasvale , queensland , and ruined some bananna crops, because of that
they say prices of bannanas will go from 14$ a box to 40$
they make it sound like innasvale was the only place taht grew bananna,
infact there are 4 other places near by taht where untouched by teh
cyclone taht grew banannas, plus there are another 13 major places in
australia that grow alot more bannans than innasvale, its just all
bullshit.

mark k
what has that got to do with the petrol we produce here in australia?
"Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in message
news:nN6dnZO215O_HtrZ4p2dnA@sedona.net...
> Go for it. That will keep you too busy to troll.
>
> Mike
>

 

hi, its just all crap, . the government knows that we CANNOT
live/survive without gasoline, so they come up with the bullcrap that
supplys are getting shorter etc..... so that they can hijak the oil prices.
australia produces gasoline , but some how we here mysteriously dont
use it , cause if there is anything happening in the world , the gov
goes " due to %^$$^$%&^%$^%$ the price of petrol has to go up "

how come petrol , one week is $ 1.28 a litre then something happens
in the world and petrol goes up 10 cents ??
what about the petrol that was in the tanks at the stations for 1.28 , .
why doesnt the petrol that was in the tanks stay at 1.28 , cause they got
it at the cheaper price , why dont they use that up then put more petrol
in at the dearer price.

there is no way teh petrol companies will allow a extremely high mileage
per litre petrol engine to be produced. that means they will sell less
fuel , what about the people taht have designed these engines , and teh
petrol compaines brought them out or hasseld em ?

another example of governments bullshit is teh cyclones taht went thru
innasvale , queensland , and ruined some bananna crops, because of that
they say prices of bannanas will go from 14$ a box to 40$
they make it sound like innasvale was the only place taht grew bananna,
infact there are 4 other places near by taht where untouched by teh
cyclone taht grew banannas, plus there are another 13 major places in
australia that grow alot more bannans than innasvale, its just all
bullshit.

mark k
what has that got to do with the petrol we produce here in australia?
"Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote in message
news:nN6dnZO215O_HtrZ4p2dnA@sedona.net...
> Go for it. That will keep you too busy to troll.
>
> Mike
>