Whoooohoooo! - Probably my next vehicle!! I may sneak a truck in
first but it looks like it will be the replacement for my 2006
hatchback as long as it has decent specs.


On Sun, 29 Jul 2007 17:50:06 -0500, Leonardo <sss@centurytel.net>
wrote:

>nothermark wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 07:59:29 -0400, "hyundaitech"
>> <notpublic@not.public.com> wrote:
>>
>>> While I think Eric's estimate of Forester fuel economy is a little high for
>>> what the average user will experience, I still think you'll have better
>>> fuel economy with the Forester.
>>>
>>> When it comes down to it, the Tucson has all the advantages (and
>>> disadvantages) of an SUV. The Forester, on the other hand, is much more
>>> like a car in just about every aspect. Probably the most important thing
>>> you should consider is whether you'd like a lighter station wagon type
>>> vehicle or a heavier SUV type vehicle. That'll wind up being the largest
>>> difference (aside from the performance).
>>
>> Let's see - you sit higher so you can roll over easier. The old
>> Elantra towed more with better gas milage and would hold almost as
>> much. I'd really rather have an Elantra 5 door or wagon. That would
>> really compete with the Forrester. Are you listening Hyundai??????
>
>Elantra will be available in wagon form in '08
>
>http://www.thetorquereport.com/2007/...ll_be_sol.html
>
>L.