GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
#181
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
Those that ride bikes on the roadways should pay a tax and have a license to
help pay for the roads, like all other that us the roadways. Why should
they get a free ride?
mike hunt
"Skenny" <skenny@high_streamDOTnet> wrote in message
news:1152283907_12627@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> Was that your favorite pink girlie bike with the pretty tassles that blew
> in the wind? (much as you do here now.)
>
> "Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> news:ff0sa2l92dqd0kvdq2e6hs453lq5k6t5u4@4ax.com...
>> I used to ride a bike down
>> through a valley to a job I had at 5:00 in the morning, and a leaky
>> high tension wire spewed ionized air and it fell down on th street
>> from above as it was cooler air, and I always smelled it. It was not
>> Ozone, however.
>>
>> Roy "Dooms" Sullivan was a strange fellow.
>>
>> http://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/weather/weather.html
>
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----
help pay for the roads, like all other that us the roadways. Why should
they get a free ride?
mike hunt
"Skenny" <skenny@high_streamDOTnet> wrote in message
news:1152283907_12627@sp6iad.superfeed.net...
> Was that your favorite pink girlie bike with the pretty tassles that blew
> in the wind? (much as you do here now.)
>
> "Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> news:ff0sa2l92dqd0kvdq2e6hs453lq5k6t5u4@4ax.com...
>> I used to ride a bike down
>> through a valley to a job I had at 5:00 in the morning, and a leaky
>> high tension wire spewed ionized air and it fell down on th street
>> from above as it was cooler air, and I always smelled it. It was not
>> Ozone, however.
>>
>> Roy "Dooms" Sullivan was a strange fellow.
>>
>> http://www.exploratorium.edu/ronh/weather/weather.html
>
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
> News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
> Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
> =----
#182
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
You mean like when we us fiberglass to replace asbestos? Look at both under
a microscope and see which is more likely to damage ones lungs LOL
mike hunt
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f50ta2lrh60uq5qhh0huqimu7l23jd1rgn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:05:34 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
> <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:34:12 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>>. When the patent expired and Dow
>>>Chemical stopped being the biggest producer of R22 and R12 it suddenly
>>>became evil.
>>
>> "Freon" is (was) a DuPont product.
>
> You are right, sorry for the confusion. The principle is still valid.
> Fat cats were not making money on it anymore, they had a new product
> so the old one was made evil.
> In a few years we will find out how "evil" R-134 is and that will be
> banned.
a microscope and see which is more likely to damage ones lungs LOL
mike hunt
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f50ta2lrh60uq5qhh0huqimu7l23jd1rgn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:05:34 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
> <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:34:12 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>>. When the patent expired and Dow
>>>Chemical stopped being the biggest producer of R22 and R12 it suddenly
>>>became evil.
>>
>> "Freon" is (was) a DuPont product.
>
> You are right, sorry for the confusion. The principle is still valid.
> Fat cats were not making money on it anymore, they had a new product
> so the old one was made evil.
> In a few years we will find out how "evil" R-134 is and that will be
> banned.
#183
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
You mean like when we us fiberglass to replace asbestos? Look at both under
a microscope and see which is more likely to damage ones lungs LOL
mike hunt
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f50ta2lrh60uq5qhh0huqimu7l23jd1rgn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:05:34 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
> <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:34:12 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>>. When the patent expired and Dow
>>>Chemical stopped being the biggest producer of R22 and R12 it suddenly
>>>became evil.
>>
>> "Freon" is (was) a DuPont product.
>
> You are right, sorry for the confusion. The principle is still valid.
> Fat cats were not making money on it anymore, they had a new product
> so the old one was made evil.
> In a few years we will find out how "evil" R-134 is and that will be
> banned.
a microscope and see which is more likely to damage ones lungs LOL
mike hunt
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f50ta2lrh60uq5qhh0huqimu7l23jd1rgn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:05:34 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
> <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:34:12 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>>. When the patent expired and Dow
>>>Chemical stopped being the biggest producer of R22 and R12 it suddenly
>>>became evil.
>>
>> "Freon" is (was) a DuPont product.
>
> You are right, sorry for the confusion. The principle is still valid.
> Fat cats were not making money on it anymore, they had a new product
> so the old one was made evil.
> In a few years we will find out how "evil" R-134 is and that will be
> banned.
#184
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
You mean like when we us fiberglass to replace asbestos? Look at both under
a microscope and see which is more likely to damage ones lungs LOL
mike hunt
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f50ta2lrh60uq5qhh0huqimu7l23jd1rgn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:05:34 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
> <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:34:12 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>>. When the patent expired and Dow
>>>Chemical stopped being the biggest producer of R22 and R12 it suddenly
>>>became evil.
>>
>> "Freon" is (was) a DuPont product.
>
> You are right, sorry for the confusion. The principle is still valid.
> Fat cats were not making money on it anymore, they had a new product
> so the old one was made evil.
> In a few years we will find out how "evil" R-134 is and that will be
> banned.
a microscope and see which is more likely to damage ones lungs LOL
mike hunt
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:f50ta2lrh60uq5qhh0huqimu7l23jd1rgn@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:05:34 GMT, Roy L. Fuchs
> <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 22:34:12 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>>. When the patent expired and Dow
>>>Chemical stopped being the biggest producer of R22 and R12 it suddenly
>>>became evil.
>>
>> "Freon" is (was) a DuPont product.
>
> You are right, sorry for the confusion. The principle is still valid.
> Fat cats were not making money on it anymore, they had a new product
> so the old one was made evil.
> In a few years we will find out how "evil" R-134 is and that will be
> banned.
#185
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:c3psa2p9m2ug3s93cb4rfcft6pbbl7i89j@4ax.com...
> On 6 Jul 2006 18:24:06 -0500, nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
>>You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
>>the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
>>we can do in this country is negligible.
>
> Well, that's a little drastic.
>
> On the bright side, when CO2 increases, so do plants and orgasms > --
> Bob
#186
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:c3psa2p9m2ug3s93cb4rfcft6pbbl7i89j@4ax.com...
> On 6 Jul 2006 18:24:06 -0500, nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
>>You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
>>the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
>>we can do in this country is negligible.
>
> Well, that's a little drastic.
>
> On the bright side, when CO2 increases, so do plants and orgasms > --
> Bob
#187
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:c3psa2p9m2ug3s93cb4rfcft6pbbl7i89j@4ax.com...
> On 6 Jul 2006 18:24:06 -0500, nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
>>You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
>>the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
>>we can do in this country is negligible.
>
> Well, that's a little drastic.
>
> On the bright side, when CO2 increases, so do plants and orgasms > --
> Bob
#188
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
Is that YOU Chicken Little? I thought Gore was telling us the glaciers
were all going to melt? Will that not COOL the oceans
mike
F. H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:IZtrg.2732$LS6.195@trnddc03...
> I seem to recall that rising temperatures in the oceans will kill off the
> plankton with dire consequences.
>
>
were all going to melt? Will that not COOL the oceans
mike
F. H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:IZtrg.2732$LS6.195@trnddc03...
> I seem to recall that rising temperatures in the oceans will kill off the
> plankton with dire consequences.
>
>
#189
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
Is that YOU Chicken Little? I thought Gore was telling us the glaciers
were all going to melt? Will that not COOL the oceans
mike
F. H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:IZtrg.2732$LS6.195@trnddc03...
> I seem to recall that rising temperatures in the oceans will kill off the
> plankton with dire consequences.
>
>
were all going to melt? Will that not COOL the oceans
mike
F. H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:IZtrg.2732$LS6.195@trnddc03...
> I seem to recall that rising temperatures in the oceans will kill off the
> plankton with dire consequences.
>
>
#190
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
Is that YOU Chicken Little? I thought Gore was telling us the glaciers
were all going to melt? Will that not COOL the oceans
mike
F. H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:IZtrg.2732$LS6.195@trnddc03...
> I seem to recall that rising temperatures in the oceans will kill off the
> plankton with dire consequences.
>
>
were all going to melt? Will that not COOL the oceans
mike
F. H." <connectu2@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:IZtrg.2732$LS6.195@trnddc03...
> I seem to recall that rising temperatures in the oceans will kill off the
> plankton with dire consequences.
>
>
#191
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
When the weighed all of that carbon dioxide man injects into the atmosphere
every day, how did the separate out the part the comes from to US to arrive
at the 30% figure?
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:zOurg.955$vO.889@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "nothermark" <nothermark@not.here> wrote in message
> news:gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
> U.S. accounts for 30% of the CO2 pollution. That is hardly negligible.
>
every day, how did the separate out the part the comes from to US to arrive
at the 30% figure?
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:zOurg.955$vO.889@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "nothermark" <nothermark@not.here> wrote in message
> news:gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
> U.S. accounts for 30% of the CO2 pollution. That is hardly negligible.
>
#192
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
When the weighed all of that carbon dioxide man injects into the atmosphere
every day, how did the separate out the part the comes from to US to arrive
at the 30% figure?
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:zOurg.955$vO.889@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "nothermark" <nothermark@not.here> wrote in message
> news:gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
> U.S. accounts for 30% of the CO2 pollution. That is hardly negligible.
>
every day, how did the separate out the part the comes from to US to arrive
at the 30% figure?
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:zOurg.955$vO.889@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "nothermark" <nothermark@not.here> wrote in message
> news:gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
> U.S. accounts for 30% of the CO2 pollution. That is hardly negligible.
>
#193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
When the weighed all of that carbon dioxide man injects into the atmosphere
every day, how did the separate out the part the comes from to US to arrive
at the 30% figure?
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:zOurg.955$vO.889@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "nothermark" <nothermark@not.here> wrote in message
> news:gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
> U.S. accounts for 30% of the CO2 pollution. That is hardly negligible.
>
every day, how did the separate out the part the comes from to US to arrive
at the 30% figure?
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:zOurg.955$vO.889@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "nothermark" <nothermark@not.here> wrote in message
> news:gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>>>injects
>>>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>>>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>>
> U.S. accounts for 30% of the CO2 pollution. That is hardly negligible.
>
#194
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
Actually one word was repeated eight times, with one for effects. Then
again who expect the global warming ***** to be accurate? LOL
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:VPurg.956$vO.270@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qi-dnVT_fIIetjDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw that's funny.
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>
> GREAT post Mike!!! One word repeated 10 times with 2 more for effect.
>
again who expect the global warming ***** to be accurate? LOL
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:VPurg.956$vO.270@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qi-dnVT_fIIetjDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw that's funny.
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>
> GREAT post Mike!!! One word repeated 10 times with 2 more for effect.
>
#195
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
Actually one word was repeated eight times, with one for effects. Then
again who expect the global warming ***** to be accurate? LOL
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:VPurg.956$vO.270@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qi-dnVT_fIIetjDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw that's funny.
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>
> GREAT post Mike!!! One word repeated 10 times with 2 more for effect.
>
again who expect the global warming ***** to be accurate? LOL
mike hunt
"grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
news:VPurg.956$vO.270@newsread4.news.pas.earthlink .net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qi-dnVT_fIIetjDZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw, haw that's funny.
>>
>> mike
>>
>>
>
> GREAT post Mike!!! One word repeated 10 times with 2 more for effect.
>