GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
#631
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared?RELAX!
William Dryden wrote:
> "Edwin Pawlowski" <esp@snet.net> wrote in message
> news:tsJug.6346$2v.3067@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net ...
>
>>"Matt Whiting" <whiting@epix.net> wrote in message
>>
>>>I've seen data to suggest that and I've seen some dissenting data that
>>>challenges it. I really don't know what the reality is with regard to
>>>global warming, other than it is now more of a political issue than a
>>>scientific one. Lots of politicians see a way to make hay with this, Al
>>>Gore being at the forefront. They will do whatever they can, including
>>>missquoting at least one fairly prominent scientist to further their
>>>agenda.
>>
>>All you have to do is look at the photos of many regions of ice packs and
>>glaciers. They are melting. There is no doubt that we are warming. The
>>real question is, does this come from a natural climate cycles, or is it
>
> man
>
>>induced?
>>
>>
>
>
> Global warming is happening on Mars too. I suppose we caused that with our
> cars here on Earth as well?
>
> http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._011206-1.html
I'm sure it is all of the probes that NASA has sent there in the last
decade. Probably messed up what little atmosphere the Martians have. I
bet they'll soon be filing a lawsuit ... as soon as we send them a lawyer.
Matt
> "Edwin Pawlowski" <esp@snet.net> wrote in message
> news:tsJug.6346$2v.3067@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net ...
>
>>"Matt Whiting" <whiting@epix.net> wrote in message
>>
>>>I've seen data to suggest that and I've seen some dissenting data that
>>>challenges it. I really don't know what the reality is with regard to
>>>global warming, other than it is now more of a political issue than a
>>>scientific one. Lots of politicians see a way to make hay with this, Al
>>>Gore being at the forefront. They will do whatever they can, including
>>>missquoting at least one fairly prominent scientist to further their
>>>agenda.
>>
>>All you have to do is look at the photos of many regions of ice packs and
>>glaciers. They are melting. There is no doubt that we are warming. The
>>real question is, does this come from a natural climate cycles, or is it
>
> man
>
>>induced?
>>
>>
>
>
> Global warming is happening on Mars too. I suppose we caused that with our
> cars here on Earth as well?
>
> http://www.space.com/scienceastronom..._011206-1.html
I'm sure it is all of the probes that NASA has sent there in the last
decade. Probably messed up what little atmosphere the Martians have. I
bet they'll soon be filing a lawsuit ... as soon as we send them a lawyer.
Matt
#632
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared?RELAX!
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>
>>I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same folks
>>that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties, and my
>>children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases when
>>leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we believe
>>them? Have you read anything from those that believe the changes in the
>>earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation of the earth around
>>the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the 70% of the earths volcano's
>>that are under the ocean and the experts who believe they can warm the
>>oceans and thus the air at will? How about the expert that blame sun
>>activity? Which do you believe is more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> There are two issues here. First, does global warming exist? I think thee
> is plenty of evidence that yes, it does.
I'm not convinced our measurements are complete or accurate enough to
measure changes of 1 degree even.
> The second issue is the cause. It is from humans polluting and burning
> fossil fuels? That is much more complex and difficult to prove or disprove.
> If you look at thousands of years of temperature trends, the amount of CO2
> increases with temperature. If you look at the increased emissions of CO2,
> the depletion of the rain forests, you'd have to conclude at least a
> "maybe". It is worth researching
Especially if you are a researcher needing a grant! :-)
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>
>>I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same folks
>>that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties, and my
>>children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases when
>>leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we believe
>>them? Have you read anything from those that believe the changes in the
>>earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation of the earth around
>>the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the 70% of the earths volcano's
>>that are under the ocean and the experts who believe they can warm the
>>oceans and thus the air at will? How about the expert that blame sun
>>activity? Which do you believe is more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> There are two issues here. First, does global warming exist? I think thee
> is plenty of evidence that yes, it does.
I'm not convinced our measurements are complete or accurate enough to
measure changes of 1 degree even.
> The second issue is the cause. It is from humans polluting and burning
> fossil fuels? That is much more complex and difficult to prove or disprove.
> If you look at thousands of years of temperature trends, the amount of CO2
> increases with temperature. If you look at the increased emissions of CO2,
> the depletion of the rain forests, you'd have to conclude at least a
> "maybe". It is worth researching
Especially if you are a researcher needing a grant! :-)
Matt
#633
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared?RELAX!
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>
>>I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same folks
>>that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties, and my
>>children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases when
>>leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we believe
>>them? Have you read anything from those that believe the changes in the
>>earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation of the earth around
>>the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the 70% of the earths volcano's
>>that are under the ocean and the experts who believe they can warm the
>>oceans and thus the air at will? How about the expert that blame sun
>>activity? Which do you believe is more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> There are two issues here. First, does global warming exist? I think thee
> is plenty of evidence that yes, it does.
I'm not convinced our measurements are complete or accurate enough to
measure changes of 1 degree even.
> The second issue is the cause. It is from humans polluting and burning
> fossil fuels? That is much more complex and difficult to prove or disprove.
> If you look at thousands of years of temperature trends, the amount of CO2
> increases with temperature. If you look at the increased emissions of CO2,
> the depletion of the rain forests, you'd have to conclude at least a
> "maybe". It is worth researching
Especially if you are a researcher needing a grant! :-)
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>
>>I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same folks
>>that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties, and my
>>children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases when
>>leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we believe
>>them? Have you read anything from those that believe the changes in the
>>earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation of the earth around
>>the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the 70% of the earths volcano's
>>that are under the ocean and the experts who believe they can warm the
>>oceans and thus the air at will? How about the expert that blame sun
>>activity? Which do you believe is more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> There are two issues here. First, does global warming exist? I think thee
> is plenty of evidence that yes, it does.
I'm not convinced our measurements are complete or accurate enough to
measure changes of 1 degree even.
> The second issue is the cause. It is from humans polluting and burning
> fossil fuels? That is much more complex and difficult to prove or disprove.
> If you look at thousands of years of temperature trends, the amount of CO2
> increases with temperature. If you look at the increased emissions of CO2,
> the depletion of the rain forests, you'd have to conclude at least a
> "maybe". It is worth researching
Especially if you are a researcher needing a grant! :-)
Matt
#634
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared?RELAX!
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>
>>I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same folks
>>that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties, and my
>>children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases when
>>leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we believe
>>them? Have you read anything from those that believe the changes in the
>>earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation of the earth around
>>the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the 70% of the earths volcano's
>>that are under the ocean and the experts who believe they can warm the
>>oceans and thus the air at will? How about the expert that blame sun
>>activity? Which do you believe is more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> There are two issues here. First, does global warming exist? I think thee
> is plenty of evidence that yes, it does.
I'm not convinced our measurements are complete or accurate enough to
measure changes of 1 degree even.
> The second issue is the cause. It is from humans polluting and burning
> fossil fuels? That is much more complex and difficult to prove or disprove.
> If you look at thousands of years of temperature trends, the amount of CO2
> increases with temperature. If you look at the increased emissions of CO2,
> the depletion of the rain forests, you'd have to conclude at least a
> "maybe". It is worth researching
Especially if you are a researcher needing a grant! :-)
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>
>>I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same folks
>>that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties, and my
>>children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases when
>>leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we believe
>>them? Have you read anything from those that believe the changes in the
>>earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation of the earth around
>>the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the 70% of the earths volcano's
>>that are under the ocean and the experts who believe they can warm the
>>oceans and thus the air at will? How about the expert that blame sun
>>activity? Which do you believe is more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> There are two issues here. First, does global warming exist? I think thee
> is plenty of evidence that yes, it does.
I'm not convinced our measurements are complete or accurate enough to
measure changes of 1 degree even.
> The second issue is the cause. It is from humans polluting and burning
> fossil fuels? That is much more complex and difficult to prove or disprove.
> If you look at thousands of years of temperature trends, the amount of CO2
> increases with temperature. If you look at the increased emissions of CO2,
> the depletion of the rain forests, you'd have to conclude at least a
> "maybe". It is worth researching
Especially if you are a researcher needing a grant! :-)
Matt
#635
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING? RELAX!
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>
>> I defy you to find more than two days out of those two weeks where the
>>current high sets a record for that day in history. If the earth is
>>indeed warming should we not be setting new daily records, yet you will
>>not see more than three in two months? LOL
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Setting records has nothing to do with averages. It is possible to have
> warming trends for years and never break a record.
Possible, but extremely unlikely.
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>
>> I defy you to find more than two days out of those two weeks where the
>>current high sets a record for that day in history. If the earth is
>>indeed warming should we not be setting new daily records, yet you will
>>not see more than three in two months? LOL
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Setting records has nothing to do with averages. It is possible to have
> warming trends for years and never break a record.
Possible, but extremely unlikely.
Matt
#636
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING? RELAX!
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>
>> I defy you to find more than two days out of those two weeks where the
>>current high sets a record for that day in history. If the earth is
>>indeed warming should we not be setting new daily records, yet you will
>>not see more than three in two months? LOL
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Setting records has nothing to do with averages. It is possible to have
> warming trends for years and never break a record.
Possible, but extremely unlikely.
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>
>> I defy you to find more than two days out of those two weeks where the
>>current high sets a record for that day in history. If the earth is
>>indeed warming should we not be setting new daily records, yet you will
>>not see more than three in two months? LOL
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Setting records has nothing to do with averages. It is possible to have
> warming trends for years and never break a record.
Possible, but extremely unlikely.
Matt
#637
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING? RELAX!
Edwin Pawlowski wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>
>> I defy you to find more than two days out of those two weeks where the
>>current high sets a record for that day in history. If the earth is
>>indeed warming should we not be setting new daily records, yet you will
>>not see more than three in two months? LOL
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Setting records has nothing to do with averages. It is possible to have
> warming trends for years and never break a record.
Possible, but extremely unlikely.
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>
>> I defy you to find more than two days out of those two weeks where the
>>current high sets a record for that day in history. If the earth is
>>indeed warming should we not be setting new daily records, yet you will
>>not see more than three in two months? LOL
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Setting records has nothing to do with averages. It is possible to have
> warming trends for years and never break a record.
Possible, but extremely unlikely.
Matt
#638
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same
> folks that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties,
> and my children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases
> when leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we
> believe them? Have you read anything from those that believe the
> changes in the earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation
> of the earth around the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the
> 70% of the earths volcano's that are under the ocean and the experts
> who believe they can warm the oceans and thus the air at will? How
> about the expert that blame sun activity? Which do you believe is
> more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> mike hunt
We've all been burned before with bad data, or the best data available
at the time. I'm not saying you should pack up everything and head for
the hills just yet. But it is the best "proof" that is available right
now.
And yes, I have read almost all of the research, both for and against
global warming.
The earth's elliptical rotation around the sun IS part of the cause.
The problem there is that the high CO2 levels aren't letting the parts
of the earth that should be cooling cool.
Sun activity has the same effect.
Volcano's too.
It is a combination of everything at once, PLUS the inability of the
heat to escape fast enough because of the CO2 levels.
And for the record, I don't believe humans are responsible for the CO2
problems. Nor can we do anything about it.
Eric
newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same
> folks that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties,
> and my children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases
> when leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we
> believe them? Have you read anything from those that believe the
> changes in the earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation
> of the earth around the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the
> 70% of the earths volcano's that are under the ocean and the experts
> who believe they can warm the oceans and thus the air at will? How
> about the expert that blame sun activity? Which do you believe is
> more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> mike hunt
We've all been burned before with bad data, or the best data available
at the time. I'm not saying you should pack up everything and head for
the hills just yet. But it is the best "proof" that is available right
now.
And yes, I have read almost all of the research, both for and against
global warming.
The earth's elliptical rotation around the sun IS part of the cause.
The problem there is that the high CO2 levels aren't letting the parts
of the earth that should be cooling cool.
Sun activity has the same effect.
Volcano's too.
It is a combination of everything at once, PLUS the inability of the
heat to escape fast enough because of the CO2 levels.
And for the record, I don't believe humans are responsible for the CO2
problems. Nor can we do anything about it.
Eric
#639
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same
> folks that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties,
> and my children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases
> when leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we
> believe them? Have you read anything from those that believe the
> changes in the earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation
> of the earth around the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the
> 70% of the earths volcano's that are under the ocean and the experts
> who believe they can warm the oceans and thus the air at will? How
> about the expert that blame sun activity? Which do you believe is
> more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> mike hunt
We've all been burned before with bad data, or the best data available
at the time. I'm not saying you should pack up everything and head for
the hills just yet. But it is the best "proof" that is available right
now.
And yes, I have read almost all of the research, both for and against
global warming.
The earth's elliptical rotation around the sun IS part of the cause.
The problem there is that the high CO2 levels aren't letting the parts
of the earth that should be cooling cool.
Sun activity has the same effect.
Volcano's too.
It is a combination of everything at once, PLUS the inability of the
heat to escape fast enough because of the CO2 levels.
And for the record, I don't believe humans are responsible for the CO2
problems. Nor can we do anything about it.
Eric
newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same
> folks that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties,
> and my children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases
> when leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we
> believe them? Have you read anything from those that believe the
> changes in the earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation
> of the earth around the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the
> 70% of the earths volcano's that are under the ocean and the experts
> who believe they can warm the oceans and thus the air at will? How
> about the expert that blame sun activity? Which do you believe is
> more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> mike hunt
We've all been burned before with bad data, or the best data available
at the time. I'm not saying you should pack up everything and head for
the hills just yet. But it is the best "proof" that is available right
now.
And yes, I have read almost all of the research, both for and against
global warming.
The earth's elliptical rotation around the sun IS part of the cause.
The problem there is that the high CO2 levels aren't letting the parts
of the earth that should be cooling cool.
Sun activity has the same effect.
Volcano's too.
It is a combination of everything at once, PLUS the inability of the
heat to escape fast enough because of the CO2 levels.
And for the record, I don't believe humans are responsible for the CO2
problems. Nor can we do anything about it.
Eric
#640
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same
> folks that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties,
> and my children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases
> when leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we
> believe them? Have you read anything from those that believe the
> changes in the earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation
> of the earth around the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the
> 70% of the earths volcano's that are under the ocean and the experts
> who believe they can warm the oceans and thus the air at will? How
> about the expert that blame sun activity? Which do you believe is
> more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> mike hunt
We've all been burned before with bad data, or the best data available
at the time. I'm not saying you should pack up everything and head for
the hills just yet. But it is the best "proof" that is available right
now.
And yes, I have read almost all of the research, both for and against
global warming.
The earth's elliptical rotation around the sun IS part of the cause.
The problem there is that the high CO2 levels aren't letting the parts
of the earth that should be cooling cool.
Sun activity has the same effect.
Volcano's too.
It is a combination of everything at once, PLUS the inability of the
heat to escape fast enough because of the CO2 levels.
And for the record, I don't believe humans are responsible for the CO2
problems. Nor can we do anything about it.
Eric
newscSdnb-oeYeFyCHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I believe that just proves how gullible you are. These are the same
> folks that were telling me, when I was is college in the late forties,
> and my children in the mid seventies, that these same greenhouse gases
> when leading the world into another ice age. Why and when should we
> believe them? Have you read anything from those that believe the
> changes in the earths temperature is caused by changes in the rotation
> of the earth around the sun or the angle of it axis? How about the
> 70% of the earths volcano's that are under the ocean and the experts
> who believe they can warm the oceans and thus the air at will? How
> about the expert that blame sun activity? Which do you believe is
> more probable as a cause of warming?
>
>
> mike hunt
We've all been burned before with bad data, or the best data available
at the time. I'm not saying you should pack up everything and head for
the hills just yet. But it is the best "proof" that is available right
now.
And yes, I have read almost all of the research, both for and against
global warming.
The earth's elliptical rotation around the sun IS part of the cause.
The problem there is that the high CO2 levels aren't letting the parts
of the earth that should be cooling cool.
Sun activity has the same effect.
Volcano's too.
It is a combination of everything at once, PLUS the inability of the
heat to escape fast enough because of the CO2 levels.
And for the record, I don't believe humans are responsible for the CO2
problems. Nor can we do anything about it.
Eric
#641
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
news:YMednZi3_KzTyiHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> If we are to go by old weather records, try this. Watch a weather
> report the shows the highs and lows for the day. Keep a note of the
> highs for two week in summer. I defy you to find more than two days
> out of those two weeks where the current high sets a record for that
> day in history. If the earth is indeed warming should we not be
> setting new daily records, yet you will not see more than three in two
> months? LOL
>
> mike hunt
Mike, I hate to say it, but your experiment to prove global warming is
extremely flawed. Some places might not see dramatic changes in
temperature at all. In fact, some may DROP. We are talking about the
AVERAGE temperature of the planet right now. Even if global warming gets
as bad as some predict, the local temperature may not change in some
places.
Eric
news:YMednZi3_KzTyiHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> If we are to go by old weather records, try this. Watch a weather
> report the shows the highs and lows for the day. Keep a note of the
> highs for two week in summer. I defy you to find more than two days
> out of those two weeks where the current high sets a record for that
> day in history. If the earth is indeed warming should we not be
> setting new daily records, yet you will not see more than three in two
> months? LOL
>
> mike hunt
Mike, I hate to say it, but your experiment to prove global warming is
extremely flawed. Some places might not see dramatic changes in
temperature at all. In fact, some may DROP. We are talking about the
AVERAGE temperature of the planet right now. Even if global warming gets
as bad as some predict, the local temperature may not change in some
places.
Eric
#642
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
news:YMednZi3_KzTyiHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> If we are to go by old weather records, try this. Watch a weather
> report the shows the highs and lows for the day. Keep a note of the
> highs for two week in summer. I defy you to find more than two days
> out of those two weeks where the current high sets a record for that
> day in history. If the earth is indeed warming should we not be
> setting new daily records, yet you will not see more than three in two
> months? LOL
>
> mike hunt
Mike, I hate to say it, but your experiment to prove global warming is
extremely flawed. Some places might not see dramatic changes in
temperature at all. In fact, some may DROP. We are talking about the
AVERAGE temperature of the planet right now. Even if global warming gets
as bad as some predict, the local temperature may not change in some
places.
Eric
news:YMednZi3_KzTyiHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> If we are to go by old weather records, try this. Watch a weather
> report the shows the highs and lows for the day. Keep a note of the
> highs for two week in summer. I defy you to find more than two days
> out of those two weeks where the current high sets a record for that
> day in history. If the earth is indeed warming should we not be
> setting new daily records, yet you will not see more than three in two
> months? LOL
>
> mike hunt
Mike, I hate to say it, but your experiment to prove global warming is
extremely flawed. Some places might not see dramatic changes in
temperature at all. In fact, some may DROP. We are talking about the
AVERAGE temperature of the planet right now. Even if global warming gets
as bad as some predict, the local temperature may not change in some
places.
Eric
#643
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
news:YMednZi3_KzTyiHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> If we are to go by old weather records, try this. Watch a weather
> report the shows the highs and lows for the day. Keep a note of the
> highs for two week in summer. I defy you to find more than two days
> out of those two weeks where the current high sets a record for that
> day in history. If the earth is indeed warming should we not be
> setting new daily records, yet you will not see more than three in two
> months? LOL
>
> mike hunt
Mike, I hate to say it, but your experiment to prove global warming is
extremely flawed. Some places might not see dramatic changes in
temperature at all. In fact, some may DROP. We are talking about the
AVERAGE temperature of the planet right now. Even if global warming gets
as bad as some predict, the local temperature may not change in some
places.
Eric
news:YMednZi3_KzTyiHZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> If we are to go by old weather records, try this. Watch a weather
> report the shows the highs and lows for the day. Keep a note of the
> highs for two week in summer. I defy you to find more than two days
> out of those two weeks where the current high sets a record for that
> day in history. If the earth is indeed warming should we not be
> setting new daily records, yet you will not see more than three in two
> months? LOL
>
> mike hunt
Mike, I hate to say it, but your experiment to prove global warming is
extremely flawed. Some places might not see dramatic changes in
temperature at all. In fact, some may DROP. We are talking about the
AVERAGE temperature of the planet right now. Even if global warming gets
as bad as some predict, the local temperature may not change in some
places.
Eric
#644
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in
news:aH2vg.601$Pa.71087@news1.epix.net:
> Eric G. wrote:
>
>> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in
>> news:OBXug.594$Pa.70495@news1.epix.net:
>>
>>
>>>Eric G. wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm rambling now, but you get the idea.
>>>
>>>Yes, you are.
>>>
>>>How open is your mind?
>>>
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/sto...age=1&CMP=OTC-
RSSFe
>>>e ds0312
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well, I never heard of the whole jump theory until you gave me the
>> link, if that means anything.
>
> I just happened on it by accident. Makes about as much sense as some
> of the other theories ... which is none.
>
> Matt
>
"Some", yes. All, no.
Eric
news:aH2vg.601$Pa.71087@news1.epix.net:
> Eric G. wrote:
>
>> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in
>> news:OBXug.594$Pa.70495@news1.epix.net:
>>
>>
>>>Eric G. wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm rambling now, but you get the idea.
>>>
>>>Yes, you are.
>>>
>>>How open is your mind?
>>>
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/sto...age=1&CMP=OTC-
RSSFe
>>>e ds0312
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well, I never heard of the whole jump theory until you gave me the
>> link, if that means anything.
>
> I just happened on it by accident. Makes about as much sense as some
> of the other theories ... which is none.
>
> Matt
>
"Some", yes. All, no.
Eric
#645
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in
news:aH2vg.601$Pa.71087@news1.epix.net:
> Eric G. wrote:
>
>> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in
>> news:OBXug.594$Pa.70495@news1.epix.net:
>>
>>
>>>Eric G. wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm rambling now, but you get the idea.
>>>
>>>Yes, you are.
>>>
>>>How open is your mind?
>>>
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/sto...age=1&CMP=OTC-
RSSFe
>>>e ds0312
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well, I never heard of the whole jump theory until you gave me the
>> link, if that means anything.
>
> I just happened on it by accident. Makes about as much sense as some
> of the other theories ... which is none.
>
> Matt
>
"Some", yes. All, no.
Eric
news:aH2vg.601$Pa.71087@news1.epix.net:
> Eric G. wrote:
>
>> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in
>> news:OBXug.594$Pa.70495@news1.epix.net:
>>
>>
>>>Eric G. wrote:
>>>
>>>>I'm rambling now, but you get the idea.
>>>
>>>Yes, you are.
>>>
>>>How open is your mind?
>>>
>>>http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/sto...age=1&CMP=OTC-
RSSFe
>>>e ds0312
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well, I never heard of the whole jump theory until you gave me the
>> link, if that means anything.
>
> I just happened on it by accident. Makes about as much sense as some
> of the other theories ... which is none.
>
> Matt
>
"Some", yes. All, no.
Eric