GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
#76
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in news:%Terg.294$Pa.34789
@news1.epix.net:
> Eric G. wrote:
>
>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is there.
>
> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
> good data to begin with.
You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
perspective, even though you certainly have better than average empiracal
abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too at first being
a little inexperienced in the archeological/meteorological relationship.
But after reading tons and tons of the research involved, I do believe it.
I have been wrong before though, and there really is no fool-proof way to
know for sure. With technology as it is today, it is the best we can do.
Eric
@news1.epix.net:
> Eric G. wrote:
>
>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is there.
>
> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
> good data to begin with.
You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
perspective, even though you certainly have better than average empiracal
abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too at first being
a little inexperienced in the archeological/meteorological relationship.
But after reading tons and tons of the research involved, I do believe it.
I have been wrong before though, and there really is no fool-proof way to
know for sure. With technology as it is today, it is the best we can do.
Eric
#77
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
> it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>
> mike hunt
Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
the median up. And it is still climbing.
Eric
news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
> it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>
> mike hunt
Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
the median up. And it is still climbing.
Eric
#78
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
> it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>
> mike hunt
Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
the median up. And it is still climbing.
Eric
news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
> it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>
> mike hunt
Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
the median up. And it is still climbing.
Eric
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
> it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>
> mike hunt
Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
the median up. And it is still climbing.
Eric
news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
> I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
> it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>
> mike hunt
Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
the median up. And it is still climbing.
Eric
#80
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
wrote:
>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man injects
>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>
You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
we can do in this country is negligible.
wrote:
>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man injects
>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>
You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
we can do in this country is negligible.
#81
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
wrote:
>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man injects
>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>
You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
we can do in this country is negligible.
wrote:
>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man injects
>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>
You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
we can do in this country is negligible.
#82
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 15:07:10 GMT, "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid>
wrote:
>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man injects
>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>
You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
we can do in this country is negligible.
wrote:
>Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man injects
>into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is no way
>that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>
You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
we can do in this country is negligible.
#83
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared?RELAX!
Eric G. wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
> news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
>
>
>>I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
>>it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
> stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
> years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
> the median up. And it is still climbing.
You mean based on data such as this?
http://www.technologyreview.com/read...830&ch=biztech
And claims of scientific consensus such as Al Gore is making(up)?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
How about other causes such as changes in solar irradiance?
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.htm
You are being mislead along with many other gullible citizens by people
whose real agenda is far more political than scientific.
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
> news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
>
>
>>I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
>>it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
> stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
> years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
> the median up. And it is still climbing.
You mean based on data such as this?
http://www.technologyreview.com/read...830&ch=biztech
And claims of scientific consensus such as Al Gore is making(up)?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
How about other causes such as changes in solar irradiance?
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.htm
You are being mislead along with many other gullible citizens by people
whose real agenda is far more political than scientific.
Matt
#84
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared?RELAX!
Eric G. wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
> news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
>
>
>>I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
>>it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
> stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
> years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
> the median up. And it is still climbing.
You mean based on data such as this?
http://www.technologyreview.com/read...830&ch=biztech
And claims of scientific consensus such as Al Gore is making(up)?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
How about other causes such as changes in solar irradiance?
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.htm
You are being mislead along with many other gullible citizens by people
whose real agenda is far more political than scientific.
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
> news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
>
>
>>I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
>>it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
> stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
> years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
> the median up. And it is still climbing.
You mean based on data such as this?
http://www.technologyreview.com/read...830&ch=biztech
And claims of scientific consensus such as Al Gore is making(up)?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
How about other causes such as changes in solar irradiance?
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.htm
You are being mislead along with many other gullible citizens by people
whose real agenda is far more political than scientific.
Matt
#85
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared?RELAX!
Eric G. wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
> news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
>
>
>>I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
>>it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
> stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
> years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
> the median up. And it is still climbing.
You mean based on data such as this?
http://www.technologyreview.com/read...830&ch=biztech
And claims of scientific consensus such as Al Gore is making(up)?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
How about other causes such as changes in solar irradiance?
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.htm
You are being mislead along with many other gullible citizens by people
whose real agenda is far more political than scientific.
Matt
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in
> news:6EudnfjxFP6z8TDZUSdV9g@ptd.net:
>
>
>>I do not believe there is much disagreement about the earth warming,
>>it has been trending upward since the last ice age.
>>
>>mike hunt
>
>
> Well, yes it warmed up after the last ice age, but once it hit a level of
> stability, it has been there for potentially thousands and thousands of
> years with almost no change. Then, about 50 years ago, it began to move
> the median up. And it is still climbing.
You mean based on data such as this?
http://www.technologyreview.com/read...830&ch=biztech
And claims of scientific consensus such as Al Gore is making(up)?
http://www.opinionjournal.com/extra/?id=110008597
How about other causes such as changes in solar irradiance?
http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/cause.htm
You are being mislead along with many other gullible citizens by people
whose real agenda is far more political than scientific.
Matt
#86
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Eric G." <NgOrSePeAnM99@Zoptonline.Znet> wrote in
news:Xns97F8C4B5F5632Xz124HiiUdfEEE6@140.99.99.130 :
> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in news:%Terg.294$Pa.34789
> @news1.epix.net:
>
>> Eric G. wrote:
>>
>>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is
>>> there.
>>
>> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
>> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
>> good data to begin with.
>
> You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
> perspective, even though you certainly have better than average
> empiracal abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too
> at first being a little inexperienced in the
> archeological/meteorological relationship.
*Sigh* I am sorry for the off-topic post, but here's my 2 cents.
There are multiple questions involved here:
1) Is there an overall warming trend in the earth's climate?
http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=166
2) If yes, is this warming caused by human activity (such as increased
CO2 levels)?
The role of the sun, the fact that there is "global warming" on Mars
etc. seem to be frequently ignored.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ge_031208.html
3) If yes, or even maybe, is there anything we can do that can reverse
the trend?
4a) What would be the cost of implementing such measures?
4b) What would be the cost of adjusting to new climate conditions, new
sea levels? After all, civilizations before us have done so.
4c) What are the benefits of letting the climate changes take their
course?
In this regard, I cannot help but think of the tourism revenues that are
being generated every year in Turkey by people visiting the sunken
Lykian cities:
<http://images.google.com/images?q=sunken%20city%20turkey>.
Who would not pay to take a boat tour over Manhattan (assuming we had
enough time to adjust, as opposed to a "Day After Tomorrow" scenario).
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
(remove .invalid and reverse each component for email address)
news:Xns97F8C4B5F5632Xz124HiiUdfEEE6@140.99.99.130 :
> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in news:%Terg.294$Pa.34789
> @news1.epix.net:
>
>> Eric G. wrote:
>>
>>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is
>>> there.
>>
>> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
>> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
>> good data to begin with.
>
> You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
> perspective, even though you certainly have better than average
> empiracal abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too
> at first being a little inexperienced in the
> archeological/meteorological relationship.
*Sigh* I am sorry for the off-topic post, but here's my 2 cents.
There are multiple questions involved here:
1) Is there an overall warming trend in the earth's climate?
http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=166
2) If yes, is this warming caused by human activity (such as increased
CO2 levels)?
The role of the sun, the fact that there is "global warming" on Mars
etc. seem to be frequently ignored.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ge_031208.html
3) If yes, or even maybe, is there anything we can do that can reverse
the trend?
4a) What would be the cost of implementing such measures?
4b) What would be the cost of adjusting to new climate conditions, new
sea levels? After all, civilizations before us have done so.
4c) What are the benefits of letting the climate changes take their
course?
In this regard, I cannot help but think of the tourism revenues that are
being generated every year in Turkey by people visiting the sunken
Lykian cities:
<http://images.google.com/images?q=sunken%20city%20turkey>.
Who would not pay to take a boat tour over Manhattan (assuming we had
enough time to adjust, as opposed to a "Day After Tomorrow" scenario).
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
(remove .invalid and reverse each component for email address)
#87
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Eric G." <NgOrSePeAnM99@Zoptonline.Znet> wrote in
news:Xns97F8C4B5F5632Xz124HiiUdfEEE6@140.99.99.130 :
> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in news:%Terg.294$Pa.34789
> @news1.epix.net:
>
>> Eric G. wrote:
>>
>>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is
>>> there.
>>
>> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
>> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
>> good data to begin with.
>
> You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
> perspective, even though you certainly have better than average
> empiracal abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too
> at first being a little inexperienced in the
> archeological/meteorological relationship.
*Sigh* I am sorry for the off-topic post, but here's my 2 cents.
There are multiple questions involved here:
1) Is there an overall warming trend in the earth's climate?
http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=166
2) If yes, is this warming caused by human activity (such as increased
CO2 levels)?
The role of the sun, the fact that there is "global warming" on Mars
etc. seem to be frequently ignored.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ge_031208.html
3) If yes, or even maybe, is there anything we can do that can reverse
the trend?
4a) What would be the cost of implementing such measures?
4b) What would be the cost of adjusting to new climate conditions, new
sea levels? After all, civilizations before us have done so.
4c) What are the benefits of letting the climate changes take their
course?
In this regard, I cannot help but think of the tourism revenues that are
being generated every year in Turkey by people visiting the sunken
Lykian cities:
<http://images.google.com/images?q=sunken%20city%20turkey>.
Who would not pay to take a boat tour over Manhattan (assuming we had
enough time to adjust, as opposed to a "Day After Tomorrow" scenario).
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
(remove .invalid and reverse each component for email address)
news:Xns97F8C4B5F5632Xz124HiiUdfEEE6@140.99.99.130 :
> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in news:%Terg.294$Pa.34789
> @news1.epix.net:
>
>> Eric G. wrote:
>>
>>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is
>>> there.
>>
>> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
>> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
>> good data to begin with.
>
> You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
> perspective, even though you certainly have better than average
> empiracal abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too
> at first being a little inexperienced in the
> archeological/meteorological relationship.
*Sigh* I am sorry for the off-topic post, but here's my 2 cents.
There are multiple questions involved here:
1) Is there an overall warming trend in the earth's climate?
http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=166
2) If yes, is this warming caused by human activity (such as increased
CO2 levels)?
The role of the sun, the fact that there is "global warming" on Mars
etc. seem to be frequently ignored.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ge_031208.html
3) If yes, or even maybe, is there anything we can do that can reverse
the trend?
4a) What would be the cost of implementing such measures?
4b) What would be the cost of adjusting to new climate conditions, new
sea levels? After all, civilizations before us have done so.
4c) What are the benefits of letting the climate changes take their
course?
In this regard, I cannot help but think of the tourism revenues that are
being generated every year in Turkey by people visiting the sunken
Lykian cities:
<http://images.google.com/images?q=sunken%20city%20turkey>.
Who would not pay to take a boat tour over Manhattan (assuming we had
enough time to adjust, as opposed to a "Day After Tomorrow" scenario).
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
(remove .invalid and reverse each component for email address)
#88
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
"Eric G." <NgOrSePeAnM99@Zoptonline.Znet> wrote in
news:Xns97F8C4B5F5632Xz124HiiUdfEEE6@140.99.99.130 :
> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in news:%Terg.294$Pa.34789
> @news1.epix.net:
>
>> Eric G. wrote:
>>
>>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is
>>> there.
>>
>> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
>> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
>> good data to begin with.
>
> You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
> perspective, even though you certainly have better than average
> empiracal abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too
> at first being a little inexperienced in the
> archeological/meteorological relationship.
*Sigh* I am sorry for the off-topic post, but here's my 2 cents.
There are multiple questions involved here:
1) Is there an overall warming trend in the earth's climate?
http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=166
2) If yes, is this warming caused by human activity (such as increased
CO2 levels)?
The role of the sun, the fact that there is "global warming" on Mars
etc. seem to be frequently ignored.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ge_031208.html
3) If yes, or even maybe, is there anything we can do that can reverse
the trend?
4a) What would be the cost of implementing such measures?
4b) What would be the cost of adjusting to new climate conditions, new
sea levels? After all, civilizations before us have done so.
4c) What are the benefits of letting the climate changes take their
course?
In this regard, I cannot help but think of the tourism revenues that are
being generated every year in Turkey by people visiting the sunken
Lykian cities:
<http://images.google.com/images?q=sunken%20city%20turkey>.
Who would not pay to take a boat tour over Manhattan (assuming we had
enough time to adjust, as opposed to a "Day After Tomorrow" scenario).
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
(remove .invalid and reverse each component for email address)
news:Xns97F8C4B5F5632Xz124HiiUdfEEE6@140.99.99.130 :
> Matt Whiting <whiting@epix.net> wrote in news:%Terg.294$Pa.34789
> @news1.epix.net:
>
>> Eric G. wrote:
>>
>>> And before you chastize me, I am not an alarmist. The data is
>>> there.
>>
>> I don't think the data is there. I've seen lots of debate about the
>> quality of the data and even the interpretation of it assuming it was
>> good data to begin with.
>
> You are certainly entitled to doubt the data. Coming from a layman
> perspective, even though you certainly have better than average
> empiracal abilities, I can understand that. I had my reservations too
> at first being a little inexperienced in the
> archeological/meteorological relationship.
*Sigh* I am sorry for the off-topic post, but here's my 2 cents.
There are multiple questions involved here:
1) Is there an overall warming trend in the earth's climate?
http://www.climateaudit.org/index.php?p=166
2) If yes, is this warming caused by human activity (such as increased
CO2 levels)?
The role of the sun, the fact that there is "global warming" on Mars
etc. seem to be frequently ignored.
http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ge_031208.html
3) If yes, or even maybe, is there anything we can do that can reverse
the trend?
4a) What would be the cost of implementing such measures?
4b) What would be the cost of adjusting to new climate conditions, new
sea levels? After all, civilizations before us have done so.
4c) What are the benefits of letting the climate changes take their
course?
In this regard, I cannot help but think of the tourism revenues that are
being generated every year in Turkey by people visiting the sunken
Lykian cities:
<http://images.google.com/images?q=sunken%20city%20turkey>.
Who would not pay to take a boat tour over Manhattan (assuming we had
enough time to adjust, as opposed to a "Day After Tomorrow" scenario).
Sinan
--
A. Sinan Unur <1usa@llenroc.ude.invalid>
(remove .invalid and reverse each component for email address)
#89
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
Very recent Japanese studies have proved that the ozone hole is closing.
It apparently DID do some good to abandon Freon.
And, I like to top post. Will do it any time I feel like it.
"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> >The only thing more arrogant than thinking man caused global warming
> >is thinking man can stop it.
>
> I think we could fix a hole as it were.
It apparently DID do some good to abandon Freon.
And, I like to top post. Will do it any time I feel like it.
"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> >The only thing more arrogant than thinking man caused global warming
> >is thinking man can stop it.
>
> I think we could fix a hole as it were.
#90
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
Very recent Japanese studies have proved that the ozone hole is closing.
It apparently DID do some good to abandon Freon.
And, I like to top post. Will do it any time I feel like it.
"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> >The only thing more arrogant than thinking man caused global warming
> >is thinking man can stop it.
>
> I think we could fix a hole as it were.
It apparently DID do some good to abandon Freon.
And, I like to top post. Will do it any time I feel like it.
"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> >The only thing more arrogant than thinking man caused global warming
> >is thinking man can stop it.
>
> I think we could fix a hole as it were.