Some states want to punish fuel-efficient car drivers!
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Some states want to punish fuel-efficient car drivers!
"Tim Howard" <tim.howard@suddenlink.net> wrote
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>> Are you stupid, or what?
>>
>> You have posted this all over the automobile-based newsgroups, and have
>> received many replies that you do not have the ability to discuss.
>>
> First of all, I just posted this, so I have not had time yet to respond.
> Second of all I see people discussing this issue amongst themselves, which
> was also part of my plan.
Let's be clear, here. If *you* were *interested* in this, you would
have joined a thread discussing OR's plan 2 years or more ago when
it was first discussed. Or you would have posted to a more appropriate
newsgroup.
And you have no *plan*, you just have ill-formed opinions based
upon reading a few articles in the popular press (rather than professional
journals.)
I don't always agree with Jeff, but so far I'm on board with his criticism.
FloydR
> Jeff Strickland wrote:
>> Are you stupid, or what?
>>
>> You have posted this all over the automobile-based newsgroups, and have
>> received many replies that you do not have the ability to discuss.
>>
> First of all, I just posted this, so I have not had time yet to respond.
> Second of all I see people discussing this issue amongst themselves, which
> was also part of my plan.
Let's be clear, here. If *you* were *interested* in this, you would
have joined a thread discussing OR's plan 2 years or more ago when
it was first discussed. Or you would have posted to a more appropriate
newsgroup.
And you have no *plan*, you just have ill-formed opinions based
upon reading a few articles in the popular press (rather than professional
journals.)
I don't always agree with Jeff, but so far I'm on board with his criticism.
FloydR
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Some states want to punish fuel-efficient car drivers!
Scott Dorsey wrote:
>dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>It was the Bush gang that decided that it was "bad" to run a surplus
>>for a while, "bad" to save for a "rainy day". It was the Bush gang
>>that cut taxes when the enonomy was already going strong (just as
>>counter-productive as tax increases when the economy needs
>>stimulation), thus over-heating the economy and leading to the
>>inevitable hard fall.
>
>Please note that Bush is an idiot
Yet he was re-elected after this was apparent. Shame on those who
voted for him the second time.
>and not necessarily representative
>of conservative economic philosophy. Do not claim all conservative
>economics is worthless just because one man decided to give all your
>tax dollars to his friends instead of using it wisely.
Of course not worthless. What true conservative would condone such
reckless deficit spending?
It's just amazing how ed our leadership has been. Mind-boggling
how Bush's policies were defended by the ignorant and the
short-sighted.
>>This is Macro Economics 101. They blew it.
>
>Yes, well, I don't think anyone in the White House was thinking any
>farther ahead than his own paycheck.
Well, that's just it, isn't it? "Peddle to the metal, until it's time
to stomp on the brakes." And those few of us who can *think* can only
watch in horror as it unfolds.
>dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>>
>>It was the Bush gang that decided that it was "bad" to run a surplus
>>for a while, "bad" to save for a "rainy day". It was the Bush gang
>>that cut taxes when the enonomy was already going strong (just as
>>counter-productive as tax increases when the economy needs
>>stimulation), thus over-heating the economy and leading to the
>>inevitable hard fall.
>
>Please note that Bush is an idiot
Yet he was re-elected after this was apparent. Shame on those who
voted for him the second time.
>and not necessarily representative
>of conservative economic philosophy. Do not claim all conservative
>economics is worthless just because one man decided to give all your
>tax dollars to his friends instead of using it wisely.
Of course not worthless. What true conservative would condone such
reckless deficit spending?
It's just amazing how ed our leadership has been. Mind-boggling
how Bush's policies were defended by the ignorant and the
short-sighted.
>>This is Macro Economics 101. They blew it.
>
>Yes, well, I don't think anyone in the White House was thinking any
>farther ahead than his own paycheck.
Well, that's just it, isn't it? "Peddle to the metal, until it's time
to stomp on the brakes." And those few of us who can *think* can only
watch in horror as it unfolds.
#33
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Some states want to punish fuel-efficient car drivers!
dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>
>Well, that's just it, isn't it? "Peddle to the metal, until it's time
>to stomp on the brakes." And those few of us who can *think* can only
>watch in horror as it unfolds.
I watched both the Republican and Democratic primaries pretty carefully,
and the ONLY person running who made any statement about getting the
deficit under control and paying down the debt was Al Sharpton.
When Al Sharpton starts making more sense than anyone else on the ballot,
you know something is terribly, terribly wrong.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
>
>Well, that's just it, isn't it? "Peddle to the metal, until it's time
>to stomp on the brakes." And those few of us who can *think* can only
>watch in horror as it unfolds.
I watched both the Republican and Democratic primaries pretty carefully,
and the ONLY person running who made any statement about getting the
deficit under control and paying down the debt was Al Sharpton.
When Al Sharpton starts making more sense than anyone else on the ballot,
you know something is terribly, terribly wrong.
--scott
--
"C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
#35
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Some states want to punish fuel-efficient car drivers!
Scott Dorsey wrote:
> dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Well, that's just it, isn't it? "Peddle to the metal, until it's time
>> to stomp on the brakes." And those few of us who can *think* can only
>> watch in horror as it unfolds.
>
> I watched both the Republican and Democratic primaries pretty carefully,
> and the ONLY person running who made any statement about getting the
> deficit under control and paying down the debt was Al Sharpton.
>
> When Al Sharpton starts making more sense than anyone else on the ballot,
> you know something is terribly, terribly wrong.
> --scott
True, but then when the government goes bankrupt the welfare state
system that Al loves so much will go away also. Those who refuse to
work have the most to lose when the government goes away.
> dizzy <dizzy@nospam.invalid> wrote:
>> Well, that's just it, isn't it? "Peddle to the metal, until it's time
>> to stomp on the brakes." And those few of us who can *think* can only
>> watch in horror as it unfolds.
>
> I watched both the Republican and Democratic primaries pretty carefully,
> and the ONLY person running who made any statement about getting the
> deficit under control and paying down the debt was Al Sharpton.
>
> When Al Sharpton starts making more sense than anyone else on the ballot,
> you know something is terribly, terribly wrong.
> --scott
True, but then when the government goes bankrupt the welfare state
system that Al loves so much will go away also. Those who refuse to
work have the most to lose when the government goes away.
#36
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Some states want to punish fuel-efficient car drivers!
"Jeff" <jeff.utz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:88ff306c-39d5-45bd-aabb-1ed4f97e84e8@q36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 9, 8:40 am, "IYM" <s u N r...@optonline.net> wrote:
> I don't have sewage tax - Luckly, I live out in the burbs and have my own
> septic system -
>
> ....and yes, the only thime I use that system is when I am indeed full of
> crap!
>Incorrect. You use the system when you are no longer full of crap.
Jeff
Yes you're right - Timing is everything!
IYM
> "Tim Howard" <tim.how...@suddenlink.net> wrote in message
>
> news:4966eb7a$0$5475$bbae4d71@news.suddenlink.net. ..
>
> > IYM wrote:
>
> >> My opinion is there are just too many taxes, period. Pretty soon,
> >> they'll have a tax for taking a crap.
>
> > Umm "they" already do that--sewages taxes. I guess you think sewage
> > processing is free? I don't think most places have a flat rate on
> > that--the more you flush the more you pay. Are you worried about that
> > because you are full of crap?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tim Howard
Honda Mailing List
35
01-17-2009 07:25 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)