what's the diff btw rotary engine and normal engine?
#3
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
The rotary engine is simply a engineering dead end. They get horrible gas mileage among other stuff I dont know why mazda uses them.Wankel tried and failed.
They can rev like bikes.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/rotary-engine.htm
#6
so does that mean that the rx8's engine is better than most of the piston engines other cars use? what about when it comes to horsepower? if it can produce 200hp with 1.3 litre engine, doesnt that mean that it's really effecient?
#7
The most common rotary motor is called the 13B which is a 1.3 liter motor.
The 3 rotor motor is called the 20B.
Rotaries aren't bad on gas, not sure what buddy is talking about... If you modify them sure it'll chug gas but so will anything else. A non-turbo rx7/rx8 wastes as much gas as any stardard V6.
I've worked on piston motors and to be honest, the rotary motor has WAY less parts and very easy to work on. They even have videos that teach you how to rebuild, in roughly 2 hours. Plus to make power you just port the motor and add any forced induction, there aren't any aftermarket parts to buy for internals. Those guys putting down high HP numbers are done on factory Internal components. That alone is bad ***!!
Not to mention HP to Liter is unbeatable.
They are however sensitive to Tuning, but as long as you don't run lean/detonate your fine.
The 3 rotor motor is called the 20B.
Rotaries aren't bad on gas, not sure what buddy is talking about... If you modify them sure it'll chug gas but so will anything else. A non-turbo rx7/rx8 wastes as much gas as any stardard V6.
I've worked on piston motors and to be honest, the rotary motor has WAY less parts and very easy to work on. They even have videos that teach you how to rebuild, in roughly 2 hours. Plus to make power you just port the motor and add any forced induction, there aren't any aftermarket parts to buy for internals. Those guys putting down high HP numbers are done on factory Internal components. That alone is bad ***!!
Not to mention HP to Liter is unbeatable.
They are however sensitive to Tuning, but as long as you don't run lean/detonate your fine.
#9
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
The rotary engine is simply a engineering dead end. They get horrible gas mileage among other stuff I dont know why mazda uses them.Wankel tried and failed.
Last edited by B6T; 09-22-2005 at 03:31 AM.
#10
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
hp per litre
HP PER CUBIC INCH.
HP PER CUBIC INCH.
LOL Yes V8's can produce insane power.... but in theory if you keep adding rotors to the rotary motor sky's the limit. Most I've seen is a 4 rotor, but I guess same could be said to the piston blocks.
But the weight and compact size of any rotary motor has it's avantages. It can get expensive to build but end result is a extremely light effecient motor.
#11
It's a lot easier to add rotors, housings and lobes to an eccentric shaft then it is to add cylinders to a block.
Next thing we're building at the shop is a 4-rotor and maybe even a 6-rotor...
Next thing we're building at the shop is a 4-rotor and maybe even a 6-rotor...
#12
Originally Posted by B6T
It's a lot easier to add rotors, housings and lobes to an eccentric shaft then it is to add cylinders to a block.
Next thing we're building at the shop is a 4-rotor and maybe even a 6-rotor...
Next thing we're building at the shop is a 4-rotor and maybe even a 6-rotor...
Do you have lots of experience with rotary motors? Last night my brother brought our recently completed rx7 to the etobicoke meet. Silver fully restored with a huge front mount, fuel cell, the works. You should definitely check it out.
As for building a 4 rotor, go for it.... Mazda did build a 4 rotor which I believe was what won le mans in 1991. Anyhow the toughest part is the ecentric shaft. But if you to a search on google or yahoo they have pictures of the shaft for the 4 rotor.
If you seach yahoo austrailia search a guy named hitman with a yellow first gen rx7 he made his own 3 rotor using 13b parts.
#13
2004 mazda rx8
MPG (city) 18
MPG (highway) 24
MPG (combined) 20
Annual Fuel Cost 2258
2004 GTO
MPG (city) 17
MPG (highway) 29
MPG (combined) 21
Annual Fuel Cost 2149
yeah those damn gas sucking american v8s LOL idiot.
MPG (city) 18
MPG (highway) 24
MPG (combined) 20
Annual Fuel Cost 2258
2004 GTO
MPG (city) 17
MPG (highway) 29
MPG (combined) 21
Annual Fuel Cost 2149
yeah those damn gas sucking american v8s LOL idiot.
#14
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
2004 mazda rx8
MPG (city) 18
MPG (highway) 24
MPG (combined) 20
Annual Fuel Cost 2258
2004 GTO
MPG (city) 17
MPG (highway) 29
MPG (combined) 21
Annual Fuel Cost 2149
yeah those damn gas sucking american v8s LOL idiot.
MPG (city) 18
MPG (highway) 24
MPG (combined) 20
Annual Fuel Cost 2258
2004 GTO
MPG (city) 17
MPG (highway) 29
MPG (combined) 21
Annual Fuel Cost 2149
yeah those damn gas sucking american v8s LOL idiot.
Honestly, learn a thing or two about how engines work. Adam posted a great link about how rotory engines work. Within that same site you can learn about how your V8 works aswell. After you've gained all that knowlegde you should argue (BTW, it is up to you.) Sometimes shuting the up can make you seem smarter.