c5 vs. LS1 F-Body
Thread Starter
Experienced GTcars Poster
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,663
From: Knoxville, TN
Rep Power: 824 
c5 vs. LS1 F-Body
This is a bit of a stupid question but is there a big price difference on performance parts between an ls1 c5 and a ls1 f-body? By parts i mean bolt-ons, superchargers, engine internals, etc. I now they are both the same engine but just wondering if the vette name makes a huge difference or not.
There's a lot of little differences. As for power the GM claims the 'Vette makes 45 more hp but that's been proven to be a joke. I mean mine put down 323rwhp and 334rwtq with just an intake and exhaust. There's no way those mods added 60hp.
Accessories on a C5 are bolted to the engine in different spots than on an LS1 F-Body, which is why it's a little tricky to make an LS1 out of a Vette fit the F-Car engine bay without moving ****.
The Vette is not the typical redneck drag car like the F-Body. The Vette was made to haul *** on a road course not the strip. Having all the torque in the world doesn't mean **** if you cannot control the car in a curve.
Originally Posted by Rockford Fosgate Fan
The Vette is not the typical redneck drag car like the F-Body. The Vette was made to haul *** on a road course not the strip. Having all the torque in the world doesn't mean **** if you cannot control the car in a curve.
I'm working on the handling part though, I have my subframe connectors now and before to long I'd like to buy Strano sway bars.
I can vouch for the "having all the torque in the world doesn't mean **** if you cannot control the car in a curve" statement. I took my car to an auto-x recently, and even with the car lowered some, these 4.10 gears just put too much to the ground for a road course. I tried the whole course in 1st once, twice in 2nd, and once in 3rd and still had waaaay too much problem with the rear wanting to pass me.
Originally Posted by SSmokd U
I can vouch for the "having all the torque in the world doesn't mean **** if you cannot control the car in a curve" statement. I took my car to an auto-x recently, and even with the car lowered some, these 4.10 gears just put too much to the ground for a road course. I tried the whole course in 1st once, twice in 2nd, and once in 3rd and still had waaaay too much problem with the rear wanting to pass me.
Originally Posted by archemedes
the 3rd gen is supposed to handle better in stock trim (part of that is also weight, teh 4th gen is also the heaviest fbody)





