Civics Suck.
01-30-2007, 05:40 PM
#241
Originally Posted by canadiancharger
Sorry you feel that way.
Judging from your replies, I can see you must have been one of major recipient’s of my son’s tirades.
I have already apologized to you twice.
Accept it, move on & get over it.
Also, I would appreciate if you could stop with the insults and vulgar mouth.
Do I need to contact the Administrators and have this matter dealt with?
Thank you...
Judging from your replies, I can see you must have been one of major recipient’s of my son’s tirades.
I have already apologized to you twice.
Accept it, move on & get over it.
Also, I would appreciate if you could stop with the insults and vulgar mouth.
Do I need to contact the Administrators and have this matter dealt with?
Thank you...
OH NO not the "my son went on n talked on here im sry for the inconvience this may have called you" move........he realized hes at the end of his chain and has no where he can go so now hes tryin to reverse it
i have to raise the BS FLAG HERE
n if this story is infact true. then Canadiancharger you and ur whole family are the sperms that should have been swallowed cuz ur all retards
01-30-2007, 07:23 PM
#246
Skilled GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oshawa
Posts: 781
Rep Power: 684 
Originally Posted by judgez24
ouch 17 pages and the first page is all hate for the econo box j body, you guys are pretty harsh, why cant we all get along and pick on kia's and daewoos? 
01-30-2007, 07:58 PM
#247
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 321
Rep Power: 710
Originally Posted by JDm_92
2006 Charger R/T's dont run 12.7, they run 13.6...Thats pretty bad for an 8 Cylinder If you ask Me. A Civic with a type R Swap in it will do 12's...Stock! Without an intake! Thats half the cylinders and a better time..you do the math
On what planet in what wet dream could you get a STOCK TYPE R SWAP IN A CIVIC TO DO 12'S...have you even been in a car nevermind look under a hood and understand what you see...
Here's some math for you Einstein
2200 LBS with driver
195 HP (ENGINE HP)
124 FT TQ (AROUND THERE NOT SURE RIGHT NOW)
even DRAG RADIALS
YOU TELL ME HOW YOU HIT 12'S...
KID I THINK YOUR MIXING UP 1/4 MILE TIMES AND 1/8TH MILE...
01-30-2007, 10:20 PM
#250
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: canada bitches
Posts: 2,706
Rep Power: 731
Originally Posted by 2TONE_93GT
i want to build car X cause its a challenge and costs more. 
Sure, that may be true for some,like a viper motor in a jeap. But if youre trying to race your car, and your goal is x 1/4 mile, then you would go for a proven recipe.
You dont see the outlaw class guys down here saying... WELL WE KNOW THE FORMULA TO GO 7's IN A STANG, LETS BUY A KIA CAUSE ITS ALL ABOUT THE CHALLENGE....
Sounds like a scape goat when you say it.
The cavi would be great if it was RWD and powered by a v8 
Civic isnt an easy way out.. a fox lx with tire and spray is the easy way :thumbsup:
Anyways, it is good to be different, so props to that
Sure, that may be true for some,like a viper motor in a jeap. But if youre trying to race your car, and your goal is x 1/4 mile, then you would go for a proven recipe.
You dont see the outlaw class guys down here saying... WELL WE KNOW THE FORMULA TO GO 7's IN A STANG, LETS BUY A KIA CAUSE ITS ALL ABOUT THE CHALLENGE....
Sounds like a scape goat when you say it.
The cavi would be great if it was RWD and powered by a v8 Civic isnt an easy way out.. a fox lx with tire and spray is the easy way :thumbsup:
Anyways, it is good to be different, so props to that
Originally Posted by SuprAdam
1994 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1, in 1994 it was $68 000 US, they now sell for $25000cdn, in mint condition.
1994 Toyota Supra TT, in 1994 it was $43 000US, they now sell for over $45 000cdn, in mint condition.
Depreciation muchly? We won't even get into dollar conversion rates back in 1994 because that makes the corvette of that year look even more worthless.
Eat .
1994 Toyota Supra TT, in 1994 it was $43 000US, they now sell for over $45 000cdn, in mint condition.
Depreciation muchly? We won't even get into dollar conversion rates back in 1994 because that makes the corvette of that year look even more worthless.
Eat .
so what happened to the supra, no longer around? yeah thought so
think is the corvette will start to go up in value again, look at the old vettes of the 60's and 50's, they sell for a premium these days. the supra is a nice car but my god is it ever expensive to mod. you could buy a c4 vette for the cost of making a supra run 12's, lol
Originally Posted by SuprAdam
Why compare a RARE *** top model car with an average base model car?
GNX
Vs.
Turbo A or Group A mk3 supra, only 500 made. I bet you they would be close in price in clean condition.
And nobody will pay $45000? Then why are people able to sell them for that price. Hell, there is even a local shop that frequently sells them more MORE than that and still gets good sales. I guess a simple minded old redneck such as yourself doesn't see the capabilities of the car, but whatever to each their own. They do sell at that price.
GNX
Vs.
Turbo A or Group A mk3 supra, only 500 made. I bet you they would be close in price in clean condition.
And nobody will pay $45000? Then why are people able to sell them for that price. Hell, there is even a local shop that frequently sells them more MORE than that and still gets good sales. I guess a simple minded old redneck such as yourself doesn't see the capabilities of the car, but whatever to each their own. They do sell at that price.
if you wanna compare that that compare it to the gnx or the very rare gnx xray
Last edited by judgez24; 01-30-2007 at 10:32 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
01-30-2007, 10:37 PM
#251
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 454
Rep Power: 0 
^^ actually the mkiv supra na or not, is one of the most rewarding imports to make power on. people have got 10's on stock twins. too many ricers trying to drag on 19" rubberbands make the rest look stupid
01-30-2007, 11:06 PM
#252
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: canada bitches
Posts: 2,706
Rep Power: 731
twins should always be upgraded to one big jesus turbo
problem is the supra isnt a cheap platform to build by any means, probably one of the most expensive imports you can build. my buddy has a 12 second supra, fun car but not cheap to build or maintain.
and i jsut wanted to add something, you dont talk to gn guys, the gn is prbably the best sleeper you can buy, cheap to mod and they take very well to mods. its like talking to a guy with a fox body that has a nasty idle and a bottle in the trunk, you dont know if its running a 50 shot or a 250 shot, lol
problem is the supra isnt a cheap platform to build by any means, probably one of the most expensive imports you can build. my buddy has a 12 second supra, fun car but not cheap to build or maintain.
and i jsut wanted to add something, you dont talk to gn guys, the gn is prbably the best sleeper you can buy, cheap to mod and they take very well to mods. its like talking to a guy with a fox body that has a nasty idle and a bottle in the trunk, you dont know if its running a 50 shot or a 250 shot, lol
01-30-2007, 11:27 PM
#253
Average GTcars Poster
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 454
Rep Power: 0
how do you figure its so expensive to build? theyre no b16 into a hatch project, but they are relaible as hell. i helped by buddy go single with his last winter, and he did a lot of the right shopping and built a GREAT single kit for himself for a very reasonable cost, including management. and its a toyota, reliable as
stock internal'd 2jz's have proven to go into 9's. any motor you dont have to pull out and tear down to go 9's on cant be that expensive to build up
and i only used twins going 10's as an example. if theyre running stock twins and going that fast, that goes to show you something. they do low 13's stock, and and can do low 12's high 11's with just bolt ons to the stock twins. unless youre shopping for top shelf greddy this, hks ti that, the prices arent as bad as you make them out to be.
stock internal'd 2jz's have proven to go into 9's. any motor you dont have to pull out and tear down to go 9's on cant be that expensive to build up
and i only used twins going 10's as an example. if theyre running stock twins and going that fast, that goes to show you something. they do low 13's stock, and and can do low 12's high 11's with just bolt ons to the stock twins. unless youre shopping for top shelf greddy this, hks ti that, the prices arent as bad as you make them out to be.
01-30-2007, 11:47 PM
#254
GTcars - Post God !
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: canada bitches
Posts: 2,706
Rep Power: 731
its still not like modding a cavalier, hell evreythings a dime a dozen 
im going by what ive been seeing, thousands on a big turbo kit, i guess if you have the compitance to avoid buying brand name items and resource them yourself it cant be too bad. but hey look at the tuner transformations supra and the money that went int the turbo kit with fmic and whatever else they put into it.
im going by what ive been seeing, thousands on a big turbo kit, i guess if you have the compitance to avoid buying brand name items and resource them yourself it cant be too bad. but hey look at the tuner transformations supra and the money that went int the turbo kit with fmic and whatever else they put into it.
01-31-2007, 12:15 AM
#255
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: toronto
Posts: 98
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by JDm_92
2006 Charger R/T's dont run 12.7, they run 13.6...Thats pretty bad for an 8 Cylinder If you ask Me. A Civic with a type R Swap in it will do 12's...Stock! Without an intake! Thats half the cylinders and a better time..you do the math
A 2006 Charger R/T runs a 14.2, they come with a 5.8L HEMI engine putting out 340hp and 390tq. The 2006 srt-8's run 13.5, and they come with a 6.1L HEMI engine putting out 425hp and 420tq. My friends h22 civic with 180whp can run mid 13s all day. An EG with a type-r can run 12s with a stock bottom equiped with just bolt ons but as for stock completely not even an intake, you'll be probably more around a high 13.