Is the dodge neon that bad of a car?
10-19-2006, 08:45 AM
#76
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 108
Rep Power: 705 
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
heres a little trivia
Really? sorry but you have been watching to much trailer park boys. The fact of the matter is you your father or anyone you know wouldent be able to afford one. Let alone a trailer park recipient. Good way to bash a car judgeing by a hairstyle at the time. Your dad banged your mom with that ferra facet hair doo didnt he? I mean your here arent you?
Did kowalski on vanishing point have a mullet? LOL I dont think they even hit the streets till the late 70s , the t/a in my pic is from the early 70s.
1992 z28 mullet mobile at the time? yeah prolly that was right before the Kurt cocane era so yes mullets were popular. In 15 years people will laugh at your car because it was nothing more then a econo car with a cheapo body kit. If your going to insult a car do it rather then point out a hairstyle at the time. I guess since you drive a import powered car that means you have a small asian dick? probibly but thats besides the point.
Yes the camaro is SEXY.
Really? sorry but you have been watching to much trailer park boys. The fact of the matter is you your father or anyone you know wouldent be able to afford one. Let alone a trailer park recipient. Good way to bash a car judgeing by a hairstyle at the time. Your dad banged your mom with that ferra facet hair doo didnt he? I mean your here arent you?
Did kowalski on vanishing point have a mullet? LOL I dont think they even hit the streets till the late 70s , the t/a in my pic is from the early 70s.1992 z28 mullet mobile at the time? yeah prolly that was right before the Kurt cocane era so yes mullets were popular. In 15 years people will laugh at your car because it was nothing more then a econo car with a cheapo body kit. If your going to insult a car do it rather then point out a hairstyle at the time. I guess since you drive a import powered car that means you have a small asian dick? probibly but thats besides the point.
Yes the camaro is SEXY.
Were still arguing about this? Whatever, you win, I give up. Your mulletcar is the sexiest AND the fastest car ever, and mines a slow ugly piece of . Thank you for opening my eyes to that.
10-19-2006, 10:43 PM
#78
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
That mullet racer in my sig is worth 5-10 of your DSMs. It also runs low 13s bone stock on shitty 70s vinyl tires. So shut the **** up. To top things off it will always hold value were as your car "the definition of unreliable" wont be worth dick in 20 years. No it is not my car.. dont belive me? go have a search on what bad boys like that are going for. As for taste that you may actually laugh well thats your opinion but IMO your car is ugly and is no comparison.
What I drive? a 1992 z28 mullet mobile. Much like this one. Other then this one has visible exhaust mods but apperance wise is stock.
What I drive? a 1992 z28 mullet mobile. Much like this one. Other then this one has visible exhaust mods but apperance wise is stock.
10-20-2006, 05:32 PM
#79
Skilled GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Strokerace
Buddy, that is BULLSHIT. you POS Z28 does not run in the 13's stock. High 14's yes, that is does. Hell, even brand new out of the factory 92's ran 15's. So please, go smoke another one and thank you for coming out.
Are you ****ing stupid? who the **** said my z28 ran that stock? I was refering to the trans am numb nuts.. BTW whats a " you pos".. Notice how I said " crappy 70s vinyl tires" dumb****? put two and two together HAD NO CLUE 1992 WAS IN THE 70S.. What do you drive?
Perhaps you can start a forum here at your homepage http://www.cdss.ca/LEARN HOW TO READ RETARD.
10-21-2006, 05:05 AM
#80
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Are you ****ing stupid? who the **** said my z28 ran that stock? I was refering to the trans am numb nuts.. BTW whats a " you pos".. Notice how I said " crappy 70s vinyl tires" dumb****? put two and two together HAD NO CLUE 1992 WAS IN THE 70S.. What do you drive? Perhaps you can start a forum here at your homepage http://www.cdss.ca/
LEARN HOW TO READ RETARD.
Perhaps you can start a forum here at your homepage http://www.cdss.ca/LEARN HOW TO READ RETARD.
Even better. The Trans Am in the 70's never even got close to the 13's stock you nimrod. The shitboxes had either a 350 with 145hp stock, a 301 with a few more horses or a 454/5 that may have done low 14's stock. So please, go read a ****ing book you retard. They were boat anchors, just like your 92 z28. Chevy power is something I do know. As for what I drive, I guess you can't read either. I made that statement a few pages back. Here is my current list of vehicles that are in my name. 98 neon, 92 VW jetta and soon a 73 vega. ( don't confuse this for the 74 that I had a hand in before). Lets see, the neon is just a grocery getter. The VW, well haven't decided yet what to do with it. Maybe I will turbo it and use it to throw smack downs on Z'ers or use it to smash into slow moving Z's. The vega, well thats a new project car, just can't find a place to store it yet. So, if you would like to keep up the stupidity comments and made to look like a fool, please do so, I have no problems making you look bad.
FYI, I believe the mustang back then and now still beats the Z's, trans ams and camero's stock.
10-21-2006, 06:02 AM
#81
Skilled GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Please don't bother posting... TRANS AM's from 69-86 NEVER GOT 350s you dumb ***. Keep making yourself look like a uneducated moron. 301 was a turbo engine in the early 80s in t/a's. You know nothing about chevy power.
NUMBER 15 ON THE 50 FASTEST STOCK MUSCLE CAR LIST , YES THE CAR IN MY SIG 1973 SD-455 TRANS AM
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD 310 automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
Now dumb **** go back to school and get a real job. Your over 30 and driving a shitbox 95 neon. YOU OWN A VEGA? The biggest shitpile ever. You have ZERO reigns to call anyones car on here a POS because your collection consists of a pile of turds. Now kindly take your dumbass out of this thread.
Before you leave let's see factory production numbers on trans ams from 69-86 with 350's and 454s LMFAO. Moron.
NUMBER 15 ON THE 50 FASTEST STOCK MUSCLE CAR LIST , YES THE CAR IN MY SIG 1973 SD-455 TRANS AM
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD 310 automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
Now dumb **** go back to school and get a real job. Your over 30 and driving a shitbox 95 neon. YOU OWN A VEGA? The biggest shitpile ever. You have ZERO reigns to call anyones car on here a POS because your collection consists of a pile of turds. Now kindly take your dumbass out of this thread.
Before you leave let's see factory production numbers on trans ams from 69-86 with 350's and 454s LMFAO. Moron.
10-21-2006, 09:41 AM
#82
HAhAHAHAH looks to me like nastyzed jus SLAMMED U
i dont kno much about chevy power. but imma ford driver so we naturally hate each other cuz of rivalry but chevy's r still monsters. only car that u own with potential is that jetta
drop in a vr6 slap in a turbo n then ur tossing zaps other then that rest of them r peices of wood
i dont kno much about chevy power. but imma ford driver so we naturally hate each other cuz of rivalry but chevy's r still monsters. only car that u own with potential is that jetta
drop in a vr6 slap in a turbo n then ur tossing zaps other then that rest of them r peices of wood
10-21-2006, 11:35 PM
#83
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Please don't bother posting... TRANS AM's from 69-86 NEVER GOT 350s you dumb ***. Keep making yourself look like a uneducated moron. 301 was a turbo engine in the early 80s in t/a's. You know nothing about chevy power.
NUMBER 15 ON THE 50 FASTEST STOCK MUSCLE CAR LIST , YES THE CAR IN MY SIG 1973 SD-455 TRANS AM
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD 310 automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
Now dumb **** go back to school and get a real job. Your over 30 and driving a shitbox 95 neon. YOU OWN A VEGA? The biggest shitpile ever. You have ZERO reigns to call anyones car on here a POS because your collection consists of a pile of turds. Now kindly take your dumbass out of this thread.
Before you leave let's see factory production numbers on trans ams from 69-86 with 350's and 454s LMFAO. Moron.
NUMBER 15 ON THE 50 FASTEST STOCK MUSCLE CAR LIST , YES THE CAR IN MY SIG 1973 SD-455 TRANS AM
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD 310 automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
Now dumb **** go back to school and get a real job. Your over 30 and driving a shitbox 95 neon. YOU OWN A VEGA? The biggest shitpile ever. You have ZERO reigns to call anyones car on here a POS because your collection consists of a pile of turds. Now kindly take your dumbass out of this thread.
Before you leave let's see factory production numbers on trans ams from 69-86 with 350's and 454s LMFAO. Moron.
Go back to the hole you crawled out of. THe 73 can not and could not get out of the 14's stock The 455 was and is a boat anchor. Lucky to get 225HP out of them on a good day. I know exactly what the boxes came with, thus the part about either. You also forgot about the other pontiac engines like the 301 and 307's. Also very low in horse power for those years. Trust me, your knowledge is nothing, you have nothing and know nothing and never will driving or wanting to drive a BB pontiac. I can see you can't read, didn't say it was a 95, its a 98. Not much of a difference, but a differnce all the same.
Now for the other comment about the vr6, they suck *** like a big block chevy. The 1.8 is better to do up then a boat anchor vr. Hell, maybe I will go and find a air cooled engine out of a bug and use it. They handle more then what a VR can.
10-22-2006, 09:18 AM
#84
Skilled GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Does anyone else with half a brain about muslce cars wanna chime in on this discussion. This guy has got to be the biggest moron alive. Once AGAIN THE 301/turbo WAS USED IN TURBO TRANS AMS IN THE LATE 80S 1980-1981 TO BE EXACT. WTF are you on about 307's? They were first in production in 1980 moron and ran all the way to 1990. They were put in cutlass supremes , wagons , almost all OLDSMOBILES. They were never put in Trans ams dumb ****. The muslce car era died in 1974. Since you can't back up your rubbish talk i'll go ahead and make you look like the loser you are.
307 INFO http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/ofe307.htm
Once again MORON who's word are we going to take Muslce car review magazine or yours?
1973 PONTIAC SD-455
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD(looky hp 310 looky hp )automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
SCROLL DOWN ANF FIND IT http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/general/musclecars-50fast.shtml
Its a common fact in the muscle car world that the SD-455 cars ran these times. You have no knowledge of anything. Your clearly a burnout who should have stayed in school. Hence why you have such shitbox cars at your age. Still waiting to see production numbers for those 350/454 powered t/as , im also waiting for links to backup all claims you just made.
Or is it gonna be " I KNOW ITS TRUE CAUSE I WAS A KID WHEN THOSE CARS CAME OUT"
So fu!k you very much , have a nice day.
307 INFO http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/ofe307.htm
Once again MORON who's word are we going to take Muslce car review magazine or yours?
1973 PONTIAC SD-455
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD(looky hp 310 looky hp )automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
SCROLL DOWN ANF FIND IT http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/general/musclecars-50fast.shtml
Its a common fact in the muscle car world that the SD-455 cars ran these times. You have no knowledge of anything. Your clearly a burnout who should have stayed in school. Hence why you have such shitbox cars at your age. Still waiting to see production numbers for those 350/454 powered t/as , im also waiting for links to backup all claims you just made.
Or is it gonna be " I KNOW ITS TRUE CAUSE I WAS A KID WHEN THOSE CARS CAME OUT"
So fu!k you very much , have a nice day.
Last edited by Nastyzed; 10-22-2006 at 09:25 AM.
10-22-2006, 02:34 PM
#85
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Does anyone else with half a brain about muslce cars wanna chime in on this discussion. This guy has got to be the biggest moron alive. Once AGAIN THE 301/turbo WAS USED IN TURBO TRANS AMS IN THE LATE 80S 1980-1981 TO BE EXACT. WTF are you on about 307's? They were first in production in 1980 moron and ran all the way to 1990. They were put in cutlass supremes , wagons , almost all OLDSMOBILES. They were never put in Trans ams dumb ****. The muslce car era died in 1974. Since you can't back up your rubbish talk i'll go ahead and make you look like the loser you are.
307 INFO http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/ofe307.htm
Once again MORON who's word are we going to take Muslce car review magazine or yours?
1973 PONTIAC SD-455
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD(looky hp 310 looky hp )automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
SCROLL DOWN ANF FIND IT http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/general/musclecars-50fast.shtml
Its a common fact in the muscle car world that the SD-455 cars ran these times. You have no knowledge of anything. Your clearly a burnout who should have stayed in school. Hence why you have such shitbox cars at your age. Still waiting to see production numbers for those 350/454 powered t/as , im also waiting for links to backup all claims you just made.
Or is it gonna be " I KNOW ITS TRUE CAUSE I WAS A KID WHEN THOSE CARS CAME OUT"
So fu!k you very much , have a nice day.
307 INFO http://www.442.com/oldsfaq/ofe307.htm
Once again MORON who's word are we going to take Muslce car review magazine or yours?
1973 PONTIAC SD-455
1973 Trans Am 13.54@104.29 455 SD(looky hp 310 looky hp )automatic 3.42 HR 6/73
SCROLL DOWN ANF FIND IT http://www.musclecarclub.com/musclecars/general/musclecars-50fast.shtml
Its a common fact in the muscle car world that the SD-455 cars ran these times. You have no knowledge of anything. Your clearly a burnout who should have stayed in school. Hence why you have such shitbox cars at your age. Still waiting to see production numbers for those 350/454 powered t/as , im also waiting for links to backup all claims you just made.
Or is it gonna be " I KNOW ITS TRUE CAUSE I WAS A KID WHEN THOSE CARS CAME OUT"
So fu!k you very much , have a nice day.
Super Duty engines had a choice of transmissions: the near bullet proof Turbohydramatic 400 three-speed automatic or the famous Muncie "rock crusher" close ratio four-speed manual with a Hurst shifter. Either transmission was mated to a limited slip rear axle with a 3.42 ratio when ordered without air conditioning and a 3.08 gear when equipped with air conditioning An automatic version was capable of propelling the T/A down the quarter mile in 13.54 seconds at 104.29 miles per hour as reported in Hot Rod magazine in the June 1973 issue*. It wasn't until the advent of the $60,000 Corvette ZR1 seventeen years later that a domestic car could realize those numbers.
You will also see that the T/A's also used the 400, 305, the 301's both turbo and non turbo. There was aslo only 180 SD's with an auto tranny and 80 4-speed manuals made in that year.
http://www.iwaynet.net/~gl&lisk/1973ta.html
http://www.iwaynet.net/~gl&lisk/1971ta.html
http://www.iwaynet.net/~gl&lisk/1972ta.html
http://www.iwaynet.net/~gl&lisk/1974ta.html
So, thank you for coming out. You just proved how stupid you are by reading stuff you know nothing about. Now, until you have said car and can run it at this time with a complete factory set up, you have no leg to stand on. Book racing or benchracing is another forum.
10-22-2006, 03:01 PM
#86
Skilled GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Trans am DID NOT HAVE 305's until 1982 dumb ****. Secondly you never claimed they had 400s , previously in your posts you stated they had 454s. Nice try idiot. Lastly yes because everybody knows the 71-72 455-HO had more HP then SD455.. Perhaps you should look further into things before you run your uneducated mouth. Or perhaps we can meet up in person and you can tell me your stories and such. After all the age gap is very small. Your posts make NO sense whatsoever. How does anything you say disqualify times posted by muslce car review?
wait.. I just noticed by your stupidity thats you acutally verified my claims of the 73 trans ams 1/4 mile times LMFAO , you then proceeded to argue with me that it was false yet you posted the info yourself LMFAO OMFG.
nice one wood pile!
wait.. I just noticed by your stupidity thats you acutally verified my claims of the 73 trans ams 1/4 mile times LMFAO , you then proceeded to argue with me that it was false yet you posted the info yourself LMFAO OMFG.
nice one wood pile!
10-22-2006, 06:29 PM
#87
Junior GTcars Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: mississauga
Posts: 205
Rep Power: 654
Coming from a guy who owns and loves his TSi Talon I'm going to say that 70s edition camero is worth quite abit compared to my car. Although I admit I thought you were mentioning the early 80s edition which I can pick up right now for $700 on auto trader.
Cameros are a sexy car. Anyone who knows performance will love Cameros. But there are alot of Cam's out there that got there cherry picked by Talons and vice versa.
What the real issue everyone here should look into is how to properly debate opinions rather then just throw at each other.
One car that should deserve the fecale matter award is the 1997 Sunfire 4 door car. I've rented this before from Avis. It came bare bone with nothing. The bitch had no a/c, the chairs felt like a wooden bench, AND NO POWER!. Personally if I had alot of lives 1 would have been wasted driving this pos off the bridge.
seb
Cameros are a sexy car. Anyone who knows performance will love Cameros. But there are alot of Cam's out there that got there cherry picked by Talons and vice versa.
What the real issue everyone here should look into is how to properly debate opinions rather then just throw at each other.
One car that should deserve the fecale matter award is the 1997 Sunfire 4 door car. I've rented this before from Avis. It came bare bone with nothing. The bitch had no a/c, the chairs felt like a wooden bench, AND NO POWER!. Personally if I had alot of lives 1 would have been wasted driving this pos off the bridge.
seb
10-22-2006, 10:31 PM
#88
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 43
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Trans am DID NOT HAVE 305's until 1982 dumb ****. Secondly you never claimed they had 400s , previously in your posts you stated they had 454s. Nice try idiot. Lastly yes because everybody knows the 71-72 455-HO had more HP then SD455.. Perhaps you should look further into things before you run your uneducated mouth. Or perhaps we can meet up in person and you can tell me your stories and such. After all the age gap is very small. Your posts make NO sense whatsoever. How does anything you say disqualify times posted by muslce car review?
wait.. I just noticed by your stupidity thats you acutally verified my claims of the 73 trans ams 1/4 mile times LMFAO , you then proceeded to argue with me that it was false yet you posted the info yourself LMFAO OMFG.
nice one wood pile!
wait.. I just noticed by your stupidity thats you acutally verified my claims of the 73 trans ams 1/4 mile times LMFAO , you then proceeded to argue with me that it was false yet you posted the info yourself LMFAO OMFG.
nice one wood pile!
I see you are a retard aren't you. CAPABLE of running and ACTUALLY running that time are 2 different things. You are a benchracers and have no clue whats so ever one that car. You think that some artical posted back in 73 has any weight what so ever, then you are on glue. Read it again, and then read it some more. Then some day when reality sinks in and you can actually find a piece of like that. Take it to the track with everything that it had back then. I bet you could not get it to run anything faster then 14.6 in the 1/4. So, please stop spewing from a magasine, it means nothing when it comes down to you actually doing it. Proven numbers have more pull then something from a book.
10-23-2006, 10:23 AM
#89
Originally Posted by Strokerace
Go back to the hole you crawled out of. THe 73 can not and could not get out of the 14's stock The 455 was and is a boat anchor. Lucky to get 225HP out of them on a good day. I know exactly what the boxes came with, thus the part about either. You also forgot about the other pontiac engines like the 301 and 307's. Also very low in horse power for those years. Trust me, your knowledge is nothing, you have nothing and know nothing and never will driving or wanting to drive a BB pontiac. I can see you can't read, didn't say it was a 95, its a 98. Not much of a difference, but a differnce all the same.
Now for the other comment about the vr6, they suck *** like a big block chevy. The 1.8 is better to do up then a boat anchor vr. Hell, maybe I will go and find a air cooled engine out of a bug and use it. They handle more then what a VR can.
Now for the other comment about the vr6, they suck *** like a big block chevy. The 1.8 is better to do up then a boat anchor vr. Hell, maybe I will go and find a air cooled engine out of a bug and use it. They handle more then what a VR can.
400-500whp on stock motor is ez n has been done plenty of times.
with maybe jus a head spacer. but thats what ppl do when they wanna support more power. as for the GM topic i dont kno much of what ur talkin bout so imma stay outta it
10-23-2006, 08:54 PM
#90
Skilled GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
So STROKERACE shall we meet up and you can tell me how full of I am? I know many older car nuts who can back up claims. Its a common fact these cars were underrated. People have ran these times. They are not "guessed" as you speak. But yet you drive a vega so that say alote about you right there. Yet again we cna meet up in person and you can tell me your sad stories.