Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"TeGGeR®" <tegger@tegger.c0m> wrote in message
news:Xns974B5DB81B7E1tegger@207.14.113.17... > > My personal suspicion is that the type of oil one uses is relatively > unimportant compared to oil and filter change frequency. > I think that is broadly true. I changed to synthetic primarily because I have a 1985 turbo Volvo. Those beasts from that era have an unusual pair of characteristics. First, they don't have a PCV valve, but instead have an oil/air separator (a plastic box with a baffle) on the top of the block. To make that work, the second oddity comes in - the ventilation is like a breather. The crankcase miasma, with a significant amount of oil mist remaining, is introduced just past the AMM. The oil mist coats the inside of the entire induction system from the turbo through the intercooler (which must be drained periodically) and the throttle body and idle air control valve. Dino oil gradually builds up hard deposits that resemble packed dust that has a trace of oil in it. When the deposits block any part of the system (and mine eventually blocked the 3/8 inch hose because I thought it was too big to plug up and didn't clean it) the engine will evacuate its oil rapidly. I lost 3 quarts out the dipstick tube before the next freeway exit came up. Anyway, the maximum guru in the alt.autos.volvo forum reported that doesn't happen with synthetic, so I made the leap. I was so pleased with the results I changed our other cars to synthetic. The Volvo has not needed the yearly throttle body or idle air control valve cleanings with synthetic that it did with dinosaur oil. Reading all this, you are probably asking, "What does this have to do with Hondas?" And you are right... as you say, most cars do fine with dino juice. Maybe synthetic will improve PCV valve operation and life, but since properly maintained Honda engines usually outlast the rest of the car I don't see that it is crucial. "Relatively unimportant" certainly describes it. Mike |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
I don't burn or leak any oil and neither does my car....
TL "Rob B" <RobB@where.on.net> wrote in message news:grZxf.7917$%W1.5737@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net... >i switched from penzoil to castrol GTX to (mobil 1 + mobil 5000 blend) > > now it seems to burn more oil or leak more (maybe not related) but > wondering > what oil you high mileage civic DIYrs are using ? > > robb > > > |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
Car: 1991 Civic 3-Dr Hatchback, 1500 CC
Miles: 163,000 Fuel Efficiency: 39 - 41 MPG/Highway Oil: Quaker State 5W-30 in winter, 10W-30 in summer, religiously change it every 4000 miles. Does not burn any oil yet..........knock on wood! Rob B wrote: > i switched from penzoil to castrol GTX to (mobil 1 + mobil 5000 blend) > > now it seems to burn more oil or leak more (maybe not related) but wondering > what oil you high mileage civic DIYrs are using ? > > robb |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
merlotbrougham@hotmail.com wrote:
> After all's said and done, probably peace of mind. There's no doubt > that synthetics and their additives are superior to dino oil, but I > don't know anyone who's had problems due to the oil either as long as > it's changed at relatively decent intervals. did toyota ever find out what was behind the "sludging" problem? |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
Car: 1991 Civic 4-Dr Sedan, 1.5L
Miles: 173k 2005 Fuel Efficiency stats: Overall average and st. dev.= 41plus or minus 2.3 mpg (or +/- 6%) Warm months average = 42 mpg Cold months average = 40 mpg (so a decline of about 5% from summer to winter) Range = 38 mpg (Feb fillup) to 47 mpg (June fillup) Oil: Pennzoil 5W-30 for life of car, changed about every 5k miles or six months. Seems to burn maybe one-half quart at most between oil changes, but I'm really not sure. In the last few years I always end up adding some at some point between oil changes. I read a report on the net last year about using synthetic oil in cars. Some guy sampled data from people and wrote it up. Not a lot of data but enough to make it a worthwhile read, IIRC. Seems that, in older cars, seal failure simultaneous to switching to synthetic oil is very rare, but does occur. It wasn't entirely clear that the switch caused the seal failure. |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
SoCalMike wrote:
> merlotbrougham@hotmail.com wrote: >> After all's said and done, probably peace of mind. There's no doubt >> that synthetics and their additives are superior to dino oil, but I >> don't know anyone who's had problems due to the oil either as long as >> it's changed at relatively decent intervals. > > > did toyota ever find out what was behind the "sludging" problem? > Even though they covered the cost to avoid bad publicity, the real reason was owner neglect. |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"SoCalMike" <Mikein562athotmail@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Q-qdnanv4tPFRlTenZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@comcast.com... > merlotbrougham@hotmail.com wrote: >> After all's said and done, probably peace of mind. There's no doubt >> that synthetics and their additives are superior to dino oil, but I >> don't know anyone who's had problems due to the oil either as long as >> it's changed at relatively decent intervals. > > > did toyota ever find out what was behind the "sludging" problem? They identified a design problem with the baffles in the valve cover as being the trigger for a more complex situation involving too much heat difference between the lower levels of the lubrication system and the oil under the valve cover. IIRC a redesigned valve cover was the fix. Toyota maintained to the last that the problem was never documented in any engine that strictly followed their oil change schedule, leading to speculation that the margin of tolerance for oil changes was oo close for the V6. Unfortunately, I didn't save the link on that. Mike |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
Elle wrote:
> Car: 1991 Civic 4-Dr Sedan, 1.5L > Miles: 173k > 2005 Fuel Efficiency stats: > Overall average and st. dev.= 41plus or minus 2.3 mpg (or > +/- 6%) > Warm months average = 42 mpg > Cold months average = 40 mpg (so a decline of about 5% from > summer to winter) > Range = 38 mpg (Feb fillup) to 47 mpg (June fillup) > Oil: Pennzoil 5W-30 for life of car, changed about every 5k > miles or six months. I would like to know why one other poster here said that Pennzoil was crap. I have put Pennzoil, Castrol and Quaker State in my Accord (all 5W-30) and have had no problems with any of them. |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"Elle" <honda.lioness@earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:QYkyf.7630$ZA2.7019@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net... > > I read a report on the net last year about using synthetic > oil in cars. Some guy sampled data from people and wrote it > up. Not a lot of data but enough to make it a worthwhile > read, IIRC. Seems that, in older cars, seal failure > simultaneous to switching to synthetic oil is very rare, but > does occur. It wasn't entirely clear that the switch caused > the seal failure. > > I have changed three older (130K miles to 230K miles) cars over to synthetic in the last few years and haven't had leaks on any of them, but three cars isn't what I'd call a lot of data, either. Mike |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message
news:Xns974C559809255hightechmisfit@207.35.177.134 ... > > I would like to know why one other poster here said that Pennzoil was > crap. > I have put Pennzoil, Castrol and Quaker State in my Accord (all 5W-30) and > have had no problems with any of them. My motorhead brother says Havoline tends to leave carbon deposits, so I never even gave it a chance to have its way with me. (Although I have to wonder if somebody who would shoehorn a 454 into a Vega is the best guide!) I have used Pennzoil, Valvoline and Quaker State pretty much interchangably over the last three decades. I've only been using Mobil One for a few years, but so far I'm happy. Mike |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"Elle" <honda.lioness@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:QYkyf.7630$ZA2.7019@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net... > Car: 1991 Civic 4-Dr Sedan, 1.5L > Miles: 173k > 2005 Fuel Efficiency stats: > Overall average and st. dev.= 41plus or minus 2.3 mpg (or > +/- 6%) > Warm months average = 42 mpg > Cold months average = 40 mpg (so a decline of about 5% from > summer to winter) > Range = 38 mpg (Feb fillup) to 47 mpg (June fillup) > Oil: Pennzoil 5W-30 for life of car, changed about every 5k > miles or six months. > > Seems to burn maybe one-half quart at most between oil > changes, but I'm really not sure. In the last few years I > always end up adding some at some point between oil changes. > i thought i had a leak but it turned out that i did spill more oil over the side than i though i did which explained where all the oil came from ( that is, i washed it off and it has not returned ) so i must be burning that missing oil which is about the same as yours 1/2 qt between changes > > I read a report on the net last year about using synthetic > oil in cars. Some guy sampled data from people and wrote it > up. Not a lot of data but enough to make it a worthwhile > read, IIRC. Seems that, in older cars, seal failure > simultaneous to switching to synthetic oil is very rare, but > does occur. It wasn't entirely clear that the switch caused > the seal failure. > Some web site i was reading claimed that synthetics tend to run a bit thinner than dino at high temps and that might be cause of oil leaks at the seals. But i do not know how much to believe that when the weight rating of the oil 5w30 (etc) should indicate the oil thinning behavior within some margin so that choosing the proper oil weight would make that a non-issue then ther are the claims that all the additives to the dino oil (seal conditioners , viscosity improver etc) are what keep the seals healthy in the dino oil. thanks for feedback robb |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote in message news:Xns974C559809255hightechmisfit@207.35.177.134 ... > Elle wrote: > > > Car: 1991 Civic 4-Dr Sedan, 1.5L > > Miles: 173k > > 2005 Fuel Efficiency stats: > > Overall average and st. dev.= 41plus or minus 2.3 mpg (or > > +/- 6%) > > Warm months average = 42 mpg > > Cold months average = 40 mpg (so a decline of about 5% from > > summer to winter) > > Range = 38 mpg (Feb fillup) to 47 mpg (June fillup) > > Oil: Pennzoil 5W-30 for life of car, changed about every 5k > > miles or six months. > > I would like to know why one other poster here said that Pennzoil was crap. > I have put Pennzoil, Castrol and Quaker State in my Accord (all 5W-30) and > have had no problems with any of them. I would too. The best i can figure from techinical specs is that penzoil scored middle or so along with oils like Shell and chevron supreme and valvoline all climate etc |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"Michael Pardee" <michaeltnull@cybertrails.com> wrote
> "Elle" <honda.lioness@earthlink.net> wrote > > I read a report on the net last year about using synthetic > > oil in cars. Some guy sampled data from people and wrote it > > up. Not a lot of data but enough to make it a worthwhile > > read, IIRC. Seems that, in older cars, seal failure > > simultaneous to switching to synthetic oil is very rare, but > > does occur. It wasn't entirely clear that the switch caused > > the seal failure. > > > > > I have changed three older (130K miles to 230K miles) cars over to synthetic > in the last few years and haven't had leaks on any of them, but three cars > isn't what I'd call a lot of data, either. I believe three "successes" out of three attempts actually does have a fair amount of statistical significance attached to it. It's even a little intuitive, IMO, that your little home study indicates it's probably safe (maybe very safe) to switch a high mileage car to synthetic. The amateur (but fairly careful, all things considered) study to which I refer above appears at http://www-d0.fnal.gov/~jkrane/cars/synth_survey.html Summary: 74 cars total -- Most of the cars studied had less than 100k miles. These produced two leakers, one easily fixed by proper tightening of various seal bolts. The second leaker demonstrated a bizarre single leak at the "fuel pump pivot pin." -- Clearly the cars with over 100k miles were a minority of the sample, but not an insignificant one ISTM. They produced two leakers, both 1975 Porsche 911s. Both began to leak some 20k miles after the switch. |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
"High Tech Misfit" <me@privacy.net> wrote
> I would like to know why one other poster here said that Pennzoil was crap. I'm sure you know this, but to share my own view: Part of the beauty of online fora open to the public is that they denote in total ultimate marketplace of ideas. People can and do post anything, substantiated or not. When what is posted seems off-kilter, typically enough people respond such that a reasonable person can arrive at a conclusion that is useful. With rare exceptions, this method of transmitting 'the best information possible' is, simply, the best. Mathematical proofs even exist that argue the more diverse a group of problem solvers, the more likely the best solution will be found. > I have put Pennzoil, Castrol and Quaker State in my Accord (all 5W-30) and > have had no problems with any of them. Over 20 years ago I knew young men who claimed Quaker State caused more sludge than most. Maybe he was right--back then. But I also think there is abundant documentation that oil formulations have changed dramatically in 20+ years. So I read reports on today's conventional oils with I hope an open mind. I'm not going to switch my car from Pennzoil to something else, but I don't reject anyone else's use of anything else. I am not switching to synthetic because I have the time to do oil changes. My 91 Civic's oil change schedule also forces me to crawl under the car for half an hour about every six months and inspect (and clean up a bit) the exhaust system, CV boots, my oil pan, etc. I think this semi-annual or so inspection is important on an older car. I realize that I might very well get better mileage with synthetic, and it might improve engine longevity, too. On the third hand, seems like we get plenty of reports here of Hondas going over 300k miles on conventional oil. If I didn't have time and had money to throw away, I'd be a lot more open to switching to synthetic. |
Re: poll - high mileage civics, what oil U burn ?
High Tech Misfit wrote: > > Elle wrote: > > > Car: 1991 Civic 4-Dr Sedan, 1.5L > > Miles: 173k > > 2005 Fuel Efficiency stats: > > Overall average and st. dev.= 41plus or minus 2.3 mpg (or > > +/- 6%) > > Warm months average = 42 mpg > > Cold months average = 40 mpg (so a decline of about 5% from > > summer to winter) > > Range = 38 mpg (Feb fillup) to 47 mpg (June fillup) > > Oil: Pennzoil 5W-30 for life of car, changed about every 5k > > miles or six months. > > I would like to know why one other poster here said that Pennzoil was crap. > I have put Pennzoil, Castrol and Quaker State in my Accord (all 5W-30) and > have had no problems with any of them. Uh, if you can't or couldn't tell the difference between Castrol and the other two brands, it is beyond my capacity to help or educate you. However, I do expect that Quaker State/Pennzoil may have cleaned up their act after a lot of bad publicity a few years ago... JT |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands