GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks.

GTcarz - Automotive forums for cars & trucks. (https://www.gtcarz.com/)
-   Honda Mailing List (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/)
-   -   Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic (https://www.gtcarz.com/honda-mailing-list-327/re-royal-purple-mobil1-synthetic-275471/)

Tom Hamilton 08-01-2003 08:38 PM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:44:05 -0600, TG wrote:

> Research the small aircraft groups or the FAA for Mobil 1 comments...you
> will not like what you find. TG
>
> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e821bab6.0307311648.6ba7ddc0@posting.google.c om...
>> Bill,
>>
>> I know about that (now) but back then I should have at least
>> researched the issue...I didn't know enough about synthetics then even
>> to do that. As I said, however, Dino oil has served well, but I think
>> the engine would be in better shape if I had changed over even 15
>> years ago if not in the 70s.
>>
>> NOW, the Internet (and UseNet of course) make it pretty easy to
>> research something BEFORE buying it, if you don't have anyone
>> knowledgable locally to ask. I didn't know ANYONE using Mobil 1 back
>> then, hence it wasn't even an issue.
>>
>> John D.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Putney <peva@kinez.net> wrote in message

> news:<3F2992B2.A3B234E8@kinez.net>...
>> > "John D." wrote:
>> > > ...If I had KNOWN way back then in 1973 that I was going
>> > > to keep the car "indefinitely," I would have changed over to a
>> > > synthetic motor oil! I just (1) didn't know I'd be keeping the car and
>> > > (2) I really didn't know jack about synthetics...just plain ignorance.
>> >
>> > It's probably just as well that you didn't try Mobil 1 back in '73. In
>> > their early years they had huge problems with getting the seal
>> > swell/shrinkage part of the formulation right. People would switch over
>> > to it and their engines would leak like sieves (I was one of the guinea
>> > pigs). If I'm not mistaken, they bought a few replacement engines in
>> > those days.
>> >
>> > People today have forgotten about that episode in its early marketing
>> > days, but they had quite a public stigma to overcome for many years.
>> > They seem to pretty well have recovered and built a good reputation.
>> >
>> > Bill Putney
>> > (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
>> > address with "x")
>> >
>> >
>> > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>> > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>> > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----


How can this be extrapolated to automotive engines?

Tom Hamilton 08-01-2003 08:38 PM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 16:44:05 -0600, TG wrote:

> Research the small aircraft groups or the FAA for Mobil 1 comments...you
> will not like what you find. TG
>
> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e821bab6.0307311648.6ba7ddc0@posting.google.c om...
>> Bill,
>>
>> I know about that (now) but back then I should have at least
>> researched the issue...I didn't know enough about synthetics then even
>> to do that. As I said, however, Dino oil has served well, but I think
>> the engine would be in better shape if I had changed over even 15
>> years ago if not in the 70s.
>>
>> NOW, the Internet (and UseNet of course) make it pretty easy to
>> research something BEFORE buying it, if you don't have anyone
>> knowledgable locally to ask. I didn't know ANYONE using Mobil 1 back
>> then, hence it wasn't even an issue.
>>
>> John D.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bill Putney <peva@kinez.net> wrote in message

> news:<3F2992B2.A3B234E8@kinez.net>...
>> > "John D." wrote:
>> > > ...If I had KNOWN way back then in 1973 that I was going
>> > > to keep the car "indefinitely," I would have changed over to a
>> > > synthetic motor oil! I just (1) didn't know I'd be keeping the car and
>> > > (2) I really didn't know jack about synthetics...just plain ignorance.
>> >
>> > It's probably just as well that you didn't try Mobil 1 back in '73. In
>> > their early years they had huge problems with getting the seal
>> > swell/shrinkage part of the formulation right. People would switch over
>> > to it and their engines would leak like sieves (I was one of the guinea
>> > pigs). If I'm not mistaken, they bought a few replacement engines in
>> > those days.
>> >
>> > People today have forgotten about that episode in its early marketing
>> > days, but they had quite a public stigma to overcome for many years.
>> > They seem to pretty well have recovered and built a good reputation.
>> >
>> > Bill Putney
>> > (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
>> > address with "x")
>> >
>> >
>> > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
>> > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
>> > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----


How can this be extrapolated to automotive engines?

TG 08-01-2003 09:24 PM

extrapolated?
 
OK, if we are going to start using big words I'm not gonna play. TG



TG 08-01-2003 09:24 PM

extrapolated?
 
OK, if we are going to start using big words I'm not gonna play. TG



John D. 08-01-2003 09:38 PM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
Mobil 1 and aircraft engines really isn't news, but aircraft engines
are one thing, car engines are another. Apples and oranges.

I not worried, but thanks anyway.

BTW, be sure to let NASA and the military know, too. ;-)

John D.




"TG" <ab7rs@arrl.net> wrote in message news:<vilra4gdk1uv0a@corp.supernews.com>...
> Research the small aircraft groups or the FAA for Mobil 1 comments...you
> will not like what you find. TG
>
> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e821bab6.0307311648.6ba7ddc0@posting.google.c om...
> > Bill,
> >
> > I know about that (now) but back then I should have at least
> > researched the issue...I didn't know enough about synthetics then even
> > to do that. As I said, however, Dino oil has served well, but I think
> > the engine would be in better shape if I had changed over even 15
> > years ago if not in the 70s.
> >
> > NOW, the Internet (and UseNet of course) make it pretty easy to
> > research something BEFORE buying it, if you don't have anyone
> > knowledgable locally to ask. I didn't know ANYONE using Mobil 1 back
> > then, hence it wasn't even an issue.
> >
> > John D.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill Putney <peva@kinez.net> wrote in message

> news:<3F2992B2.A3B234E8@kinez.net>...
> > > "John D." wrote:
> > > > ...If I had KNOWN way back then in 1973 that I was going
> > > > to keep the car "indefinitely," I would have changed over to a
> > > > synthetic motor oil! I just (1) didn't know I'd be keeping the car and
> > > > (2) I really didn't know jack about synthetics...just plain ignorance.
> > >
> > > It's probably just as well that you didn't try Mobil 1 back in '73. In
> > > their early years they had huge problems with getting the seal
> > > swell/shrinkage part of the formulation right. People would switch over
> > > to it and their engines would leak like sieves (I was one of the guinea
> > > pigs). If I'm not mistaken, they bought a few replacement engines in
> > > those days.
> > >
> > > People today have forgotten about that episode in its early marketing
> > > days, but they had quite a public stigma to overcome for many years.
> > > They seem to pretty well have recovered and built a good reputation.
> > >
> > > Bill Putney
> > > (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> > > address with "x")
> > >
> > >
> > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> > > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> > > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----


John D. 08-01-2003 09:38 PM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
Mobil 1 and aircraft engines really isn't news, but aircraft engines
are one thing, car engines are another. Apples and oranges.

I not worried, but thanks anyway.

BTW, be sure to let NASA and the military know, too. ;-)

John D.




"TG" <ab7rs@arrl.net> wrote in message news:<vilra4gdk1uv0a@corp.supernews.com>...
> Research the small aircraft groups or the FAA for Mobil 1 comments...you
> will not like what you find. TG
>
> "John D." <jcdech@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:e821bab6.0307311648.6ba7ddc0@posting.google.c om...
> > Bill,
> >
> > I know about that (now) but back then I should have at least
> > researched the issue...I didn't know enough about synthetics then even
> > to do that. As I said, however, Dino oil has served well, but I think
> > the engine would be in better shape if I had changed over even 15
> > years ago if not in the 70s.
> >
> > NOW, the Internet (and UseNet of course) make it pretty easy to
> > research something BEFORE buying it, if you don't have anyone
> > knowledgable locally to ask. I didn't know ANYONE using Mobil 1 back
> > then, hence it wasn't even an issue.
> >
> > John D.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Bill Putney <peva@kinez.net> wrote in message

> news:<3F2992B2.A3B234E8@kinez.net>...
> > > "John D." wrote:
> > > > ...If I had KNOWN way back then in 1973 that I was going
> > > > to keep the car "indefinitely," I would have changed over to a
> > > > synthetic motor oil! I just (1) didn't know I'd be keeping the car and
> > > > (2) I really didn't know jack about synthetics...just plain ignorance.
> > >
> > > It's probably just as well that you didn't try Mobil 1 back in '73. In
> > > their early years they had huge problems with getting the seal
> > > swell/shrinkage part of the formulation right. People would switch over
> > > to it and their engines would leak like sieves (I was one of the guinea
> > > pigs). If I'm not mistaken, they bought a few replacement engines in
> > > those days.
> > >
> > > People today have forgotten about that episode in its early marketing
> > > days, but they had quite a public stigma to overcome for many years.
> > > They seem to pretty well have recovered and built a good reputation.
> > >
> > > Bill Putney
> > > (to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
> > > address with "x")
> > >
> > >
> > > -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
> > > http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
> > > -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----


noway 08-01-2003 11:23 PM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
> i use royal purple and still change every 5K miles (please no flames
because I don't do it every 3K miles ;-)))

My 2003 Civic recommends 10,000 mile oil change intervals. I didn't want to
do it with regular oil, so I'm going to do the 10,000 oil changes, but use
Royal Purple and K&N filter.



noway 08-01-2003 11:23 PM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
> i use royal purple and still change every 5K miles (please no flames
because I don't do it every 3K miles ;-)))

My 2003 Civic recommends 10,000 mile oil change intervals. I didn't want to
do it with regular oil, so I'm going to do the 10,000 oil changes, but use
Royal Purple and K&N filter.



Philip® 08-02-2003 01:28 AM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
In news:B8GWa.123550$R92.55720@news2.central.cox.net,
noway <nospam@nospam.com> jubilantly posted:
>> i use royal purple and still change every 5K miles (please no
>> flames

> because I don't do it every 3K miles ;-)))
>
> My 2003 Civic recommends 10,000 mile oil change intervals. I
> didn't want to do it with regular oil, so I'm going to do the
> 10,000 oil changes, but use Royal Purple and K&N filter.


Might you transcribe the Owner's Manual verbatim regarding 10k miler oil
service intervals, please? What are the exceptions to that
recommendation?
--

~~Philip

cantankerous | kan-TANG-kruss | adjective: difficult or irritating to
deal with.

Example: Philip was always cantankerous in the morning, given to snapping
and snarling until he'd had his first cup of coffee and a soothing hot
shower.



Philip® 08-02-2003 01:28 AM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
In news:B8GWa.123550$R92.55720@news2.central.cox.net,
noway <nospam@nospam.com> jubilantly posted:
>> i use royal purple and still change every 5K miles (please no
>> flames

> because I don't do it every 3K miles ;-)))
>
> My 2003 Civic recommends 10,000 mile oil change intervals. I
> didn't want to do it with regular oil, so I'm going to do the
> 10,000 oil changes, but use Royal Purple and K&N filter.


Might you transcribe the Owner's Manual verbatim regarding 10k miler oil
service intervals, please? What are the exceptions to that
recommendation?
--

~~Philip

cantankerous | kan-TANG-kruss | adjective: difficult or irritating to
deal with.

Example: Philip was always cantankerous in the morning, given to snapping
and snarling until he'd had his first cup of coffee and a soothing hot
shower.



John D. 08-02-2003 01:42 AM

Re: extrapolated?
 
Well, big words save space because they take the place of lots of little words. ;-)

John D.



"TG" <ab7rs@arrl.net> wrote in message news:<vim4ma4s953d7a@corp.supernews.com>...
> OK, if we are going to start using big words I'm not gonna play. TG


John D. 08-02-2003 01:42 AM

Re: extrapolated?
 
Well, big words save space because they take the place of lots of little words. ;-)

John D.



"TG" <ab7rs@arrl.net> wrote in message news:<vim4ma4s953d7a@corp.supernews.com>...
> OK, if we are going to start using big words I'm not gonna play. TG


Dave Kelsen 08-02-2003 08:16 AM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
On 8/2/2003 12:28 AM Philip® spake these words of knowledge:

> In news:B8GWa.123550$R92.55720@news2.central.cox.net,
> noway <nospam@nospam.com> jubilantly posted:
>>> i use royal purple and still change every 5K miles (please no
>>> flames

>> because I don't do it every 3K miles ;-)))
>>
>> My 2003 Civic recommends 10,000 mile oil change intervals. I
>> didn't want to do it with regular oil, so I'm going to do the
>> 10,000 oil changes, but use Royal Purple and K&N filter.

>
> Might you transcribe the Owner's Manual verbatim regarding 10k miler oil
> service intervals, please? What are the exceptions to that
> recommendation?


Phil, my Accord manual says this:

"*U.S. Owners* - Follow the Maintenance schedule for Severe Conditions
if you drive your car MAINLY under one or more of the following conditions.

Driving less than 5 miles (8 km) per trip or, in freezing temperatures,
driving less than 10 miles (16 km) per trip.

Driving in extremely hot [over 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees
Celsius)] conditions.

Extensive idling or long periods of stop-and-go driving, such as a taxi
or a commercial delivery vehicle.

Trailer-towing, driving with a roof rack, or driving in mountainous
conditions.

Driving on muddy, dusty, or deiced roads.

NOTE: If you only OCCASIONALLY drive under a "severe" condition, you
should follow the Normal Conditions Maintenance Schedule.

*Canadian Owners* - Follow the Maintenance Schedule for Severe Conditions."

Reading this last, I note that the manufacturer recommends that a fellow
office worker, living here in Alabama, driving the same car under the
same conditions, should use a different maintenance schedule than I
because he's from Saskatchewan...

The Normal Conditions Maintenance Schedule includes 10,000 mile oil
change intervals; the Severe, 5,000 miles.


RFT!!!
Dave Kelsen
--
A good friend will come bail you out of jail, but a true friend will be
sitting next to you saying, "Damn... we ed up!"



Dave Kelsen 08-02-2003 08:16 AM

Re: Royal Purple or Mobil1 Synthetic
 
On 8/2/2003 12:28 AM Philip® spake these words of knowledge:

> In news:B8GWa.123550$R92.55720@news2.central.cox.net,
> noway <nospam@nospam.com> jubilantly posted:
>>> i use royal purple and still change every 5K miles (please no
>>> flames

>> because I don't do it every 3K miles ;-)))
>>
>> My 2003 Civic recommends 10,000 mile oil change intervals. I
>> didn't want to do it with regular oil, so I'm going to do the
>> 10,000 oil changes, but use Royal Purple and K&N filter.

>
> Might you transcribe the Owner's Manual verbatim regarding 10k miler oil
> service intervals, please? What are the exceptions to that
> recommendation?


Phil, my Accord manual says this:

"*U.S. Owners* - Follow the Maintenance schedule for Severe Conditions
if you drive your car MAINLY under one or more of the following conditions.

Driving less than 5 miles (8 km) per trip or, in freezing temperatures,
driving less than 10 miles (16 km) per trip.

Driving in extremely hot [over 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32 degrees
Celsius)] conditions.

Extensive idling or long periods of stop-and-go driving, such as a taxi
or a commercial delivery vehicle.

Trailer-towing, driving with a roof rack, or driving in mountainous
conditions.

Driving on muddy, dusty, or deiced roads.

NOTE: If you only OCCASIONALLY drive under a "severe" condition, you
should follow the Normal Conditions Maintenance Schedule.

*Canadian Owners* - Follow the Maintenance Schedule for Severe Conditions."

Reading this last, I note that the manufacturer recommends that a fellow
office worker, living here in Alabama, driving the same car under the
same conditions, should use a different maintenance schedule than I
because he's from Saskatchewan...

The Normal Conditions Maintenance Schedule includes 10,000 mile oil
change intervals; the Severe, 5,000 miles.


RFT!!!
Dave Kelsen
--
A good friend will come bail you out of jail, but a true friend will be
sitting next to you saying, "Damn... we ed up!"



Tom Hamilton 08-02-2003 08:36 AM

Re: extrapolated?
 
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 19:24:10 -0600, TG wrote:

> OK, if we are going to start using big words I'm not gonna play. TG


extrapolate
v 1: draw from specific cases for more general cases [syn: generalize,
generalise, infer]


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:57 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands

Page generated in 0.05498 seconds with 5 queries