Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
#16
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
Brian Nystrom wrote:
> Modern engines as in the Sonata have computerized control over ignition
> and valve timing and automatically retard the timing if pinging occurs,
> so you'd never even know it's happening. The engines are designed
> specifically to run on 87 octane fuel and using higher octane is not
> good for them. Higher octane fuels burn more slowly. If they're used in
> an engine that's designed for faster-burning, lower-octane fuel, they
> don't burn efficiently. Inefficient combustion leads to deposit buildup
> in the engine. With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
> can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
> absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
> extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
> situation.
I dunno, I think running your engine without oil is a much worst thing
then running in on premium fuel. :-)
Matt
> Modern engines as in the Sonata have computerized control over ignition
> and valve timing and automatically retard the timing if pinging occurs,
> so you'd never even know it's happening. The engines are designed
> specifically to run on 87 octane fuel and using higher octane is not
> good for them. Higher octane fuels burn more slowly. If they're used in
> an engine that's designed for faster-burning, lower-octane fuel, they
> don't burn efficiently. Inefficient combustion leads to deposit buildup
> in the engine. With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
> can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
> absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
> extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
> situation.
I dunno, I think running your engine without oil is a much worst thing
then running in on premium fuel. :-)
Matt
#17
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
wrote:
>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>situation.
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Bob
wrote:
>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>situation.
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Bob
#18
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
wrote:
>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>situation.
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Bob
wrote:
>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>situation.
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Bob
#19
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
wrote:
>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>situation.
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Bob
wrote:
>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>situation.
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Bob
#20
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Please describe a common pigmie !!!! Im only familiar with the real highbrow
Donald Trump type..
Tunez
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:8ubu12h49g5flralqe7hiph7j77lo507f6@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom
> <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>>situation.
>
> The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
> additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
> --
> Bob
#21
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Please describe a common pigmie !!!! Im only familiar with the real highbrow
Donald Trump type..
Tunez
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:8ubu12h49g5flralqe7hiph7j77lo507f6@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom
> <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>>situation.
>
> The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
> additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
> --
> Bob
#22
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
--
Please describe a common pigmie !!!! Im only familiar with the real highbrow
Donald Trump type..
Tunez
"Bob Adkins" <bobad@charter.net> wrote in message
news:8ubu12h49g5flralqe7hiph7j77lo507f6@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom
> <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>>situation.
>
> The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
> additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
> --
> Bob
#26
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
"Darby OGill" <barkbark@woof.net> wrote in message
news:%LGTf.2939$1U1.865@trndny05...
>
> <Old_Timer> wrote in message
> news:v8ns12h98a7sge2aeba4hjin4c72opfntj@4ax.com...
>> Who can tell me? Does the 2006 Sonata V6 require premium fuel??
>>
>> Old_Timer
>
>
my '06 came with an owners manual....the answer is as close as your glove
box!....I use regular unleaded.
#27
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
"Darby OGill" <barkbark@woof.net> wrote in message
news:%LGTf.2939$1U1.865@trndny05...
>
> <Old_Timer> wrote in message
> news:v8ns12h98a7sge2aeba4hjin4c72opfntj@4ax.com...
>> Who can tell me? Does the 2006 Sonata V6 require premium fuel??
>>
>> Old_Timer
>
>
my '06 came with an owners manual....the answer is as close as your glove
box!....I use regular unleaded.
#28
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
"Darby OGill" <barkbark@woof.net> wrote in message
news:%LGTf.2939$1U1.865@trndny05...
>
> <Old_Timer> wrote in message
> news:v8ns12h98a7sge2aeba4hjin4c72opfntj@4ax.com...
>> Who can tell me? Does the 2006 Sonata V6 require premium fuel??
>>
>> Old_Timer
>
>
my '06 came with an owners manual....the answer is as close as your glove
box!....I use regular unleaded.
#29
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
Bob Adkins wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>>situation.
>
>
> The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
> additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
Well, it's more a lie of ommission. They do have additives in their
premium gas, but what they're not telling you is that they're in their
regular gas, too. The old mechanic's solution "run a tank of premium
through your engine to clean it" simply doesn't apply anymore. Modern
fuels do an excellent job of keeping engines clean. That's why fuel
additives - other than those designed to remove water - are largely a
waste of money. You can remove water from your tank using denatured
alcohol that's a fraction of the price of Drygas and similar products.
This is also true of oil additives; they're unnecessary and often
counterproductive. Modern oils contain finely-tuned additive packages
that are based on the needs of the engine. Dumping a bottle of "Amazing
Snake Oil" into your crankcase is not only not helpful, it can disrupt
the balance of additives and result in lower protection for your engine.
Some, such as those that contain Teflon (which Dupont say IS NOT
suitable for use inside an engine) can actually cause blockages in the
fine oil pathways found in newer engines, resulting is serious engine
damage.
The bottom line is that the manufacturer of your engine has invested
tens of millions of dollars (or more) in developing it. They KNOW what
it needs for fuel and lubricants. Follow their recommendations and you
can't go wrong.
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>>situation.
>
>
> The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
> additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
Well, it's more a lie of ommission. They do have additives in their
premium gas, but what they're not telling you is that they're in their
regular gas, too. The old mechanic's solution "run a tank of premium
through your engine to clean it" simply doesn't apply anymore. Modern
fuels do an excellent job of keeping engines clean. That's why fuel
additives - other than those designed to remove water - are largely a
waste of money. You can remove water from your tank using denatured
alcohol that's a fraction of the price of Drygas and similar products.
This is also true of oil additives; they're unnecessary and often
counterproductive. Modern oils contain finely-tuned additive packages
that are based on the needs of the engine. Dumping a bottle of "Amazing
Snake Oil" into your crankcase is not only not helpful, it can disrupt
the balance of additives and result in lower protection for your engine.
Some, such as those that contain Teflon (which Dupont say IS NOT
suitable for use inside an engine) can actually cause blockages in the
fine oil pathways found in newer engines, resulting is serious engine
damage.
The bottom line is that the manufacturer of your engine has invested
tens of millions of dollars (or more) in developing it. They KNOW what
it needs for fuel and lubricants. Follow their recommendations and you
can't go wrong.
#30
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Fuel for 2006 Sonata V6
Bob Adkins wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>>situation.
>
>
> The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
> additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
Well, it's more a lie of ommission. They do have additives in their
premium gas, but what they're not telling you is that they're in their
regular gas, too. The old mechanic's solution "run a tank of premium
through your engine to clean it" simply doesn't apply anymore. Modern
fuels do an excellent job of keeping engines clean. That's why fuel
additives - other than those designed to remove water - are largely a
waste of money. You can remove water from your tank using denatured
alcohol that's a fraction of the price of Drygas and similar products.
This is also true of oil additives; they're unnecessary and often
counterproductive. Modern oils contain finely-tuned additive packages
that are based on the needs of the engine. Dumping a bottle of "Amazing
Snake Oil" into your crankcase is not only not helpful, it can disrupt
the balance of additives and result in lower protection for your engine.
Some, such as those that contain Teflon (which Dupont say IS NOT
suitable for use inside an engine) can actually cause blockages in the
fine oil pathways found in newer engines, resulting is serious engine
damage.
The bottom line is that the manufacturer of your engine has invested
tens of millions of dollars (or more) in developing it. They KNOW what
it needs for fuel and lubricants. Follow their recommendations and you
can't go wrong.
> On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:50:24 GMT, Brian Nystrom <brian.nystrom@verizon.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>>With modern engines and modern fuels, the worst thing you
>>can do is to run premium in an engine designed for regular. There is
>>absolutely no advantage to doing so. It cruds up your engine AND it pay
>>extra for the fuel that's doing the damage. It's your basis lose-lose
>>situation.
>
>
> The oil companies advertise all kinds of "cleaning" and "anti-deposit"
> additives in their premium gas. They lie like a bunch of common pygmies.
Well, it's more a lie of ommission. They do have additives in their
premium gas, but what they're not telling you is that they're in their
regular gas, too. The old mechanic's solution "run a tank of premium
through your engine to clean it" simply doesn't apply anymore. Modern
fuels do an excellent job of keeping engines clean. That's why fuel
additives - other than those designed to remove water - are largely a
waste of money. You can remove water from your tank using denatured
alcohol that's a fraction of the price of Drygas and similar products.
This is also true of oil additives; they're unnecessary and often
counterproductive. Modern oils contain finely-tuned additive packages
that are based on the needs of the engine. Dumping a bottle of "Amazing
Snake Oil" into your crankcase is not only not helpful, it can disrupt
the balance of additives and result in lower protection for your engine.
Some, such as those that contain Teflon (which Dupont say IS NOT
suitable for use inside an engine) can actually cause blockages in the
fine oil pathways found in newer engines, resulting is serious engine
damage.
The bottom line is that the manufacturer of your engine has invested
tens of millions of dollars (or more) in developing it. They KNOW what
it needs for fuel and lubricants. Follow their recommendations and you
can't go wrong.