Surely you did not expect logic from a guy who believes man alone can
causing the earths temperature to rise?


mike


"Tom Adkins" <newton5@remove.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:UtWdnb0onuLLHS3ZnZ2dnUVZ_tydnZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> Roy L. Fuchs wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 18:45:01 -0400, Tom Adkins
>> <newton5@remove.comcast.net> Gave us:
>>
>>
>>>Part of the reason for the recent R134 price jump was decreased
>>>production, the chemical companies switched a number of plants to make
>>>more profitable chemicals.
>>
>>
>> The main reason is greed.
>
> I guess you could say that. If decreasing production of a non profiatble
> product to raise production of a profitable product is greed, then I guess
> you're correct. I would tend to call it a good business move, though.

 

True, however if one wants to debate he must start in a NG on the subject of
the debate by having logic and verifiable facts, with which to support his
side of the debate. One can not win a debate, in an off topic NG, based
only on theory, wishes, opinions, political bias and unproven facts to try
to enforce his side of the debate If he does he will eventually need to
resort to name calling and vulgarities. They are the first and final
indicator that he has lost the debate. OBVIOUSLY you have lost, this
debate. Now it time to go back to your small world and try to get a life,
or perhaps at least a girlfriend. LOL


mike hunt


"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
news:nu22b2d0idoccfcg2uoq5vhn22js4t1etu@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:07:46 -0400, Tom Adkins
> <newton5@remove.comcast.net> Gave us:
>
>>Brian wrote:
>>> Arguing in a newsgroup is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if
>>> you
>>> win you are still retarded.
>>>
>>>

> Except that he and I were not arguing.
>
> I think it is a retarded remark. These groups are specifically for
> discussion and debate. An argument IS a debate.

 

True, however if one wants to debate he must start in a NG on the subject of
the debate by having logic and verifiable facts, with which to support his
side of the debate. One can not win a debate, in an off topic NG, based
only on theory, wishes, opinions, political bias and unproven facts to try
to enforce his side of the debate If he does he will eventually need to
resort to name calling and vulgarities. They are the first and final
indicator that he has lost the debate. OBVIOUSLY you have lost, this
debate. Now it time to go back to your small world and try to get a life,
or perhaps at least a girlfriend. LOL


mike hunt


"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
news:nu22b2d0idoccfcg2uoq5vhn22js4t1etu@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:07:46 -0400, Tom Adkins
> <newton5@remove.comcast.net> Gave us:
>
>>Brian wrote:
>>> Arguing in a newsgroup is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if
>>> you
>>> win you are still retarded.
>>>
>>>

> Except that he and I were not arguing.
>
> I think it is a retarded remark. These groups are specifically for
> discussion and debate. An argument IS a debate.

 

True, however if one wants to debate he must start in a NG on the subject of
the debate by having logic and verifiable facts, with which to support his
side of the debate. One can not win a debate, in an off topic NG, based
only on theory, wishes, opinions, political bias and unproven facts to try
to enforce his side of the debate If he does he will eventually need to
resort to name calling and vulgarities. They are the first and final
indicator that he has lost the debate. OBVIOUSLY you have lost, this
debate. Now it time to go back to your small world and try to get a life,
or perhaps at least a girlfriend. LOL


mike hunt


"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
news:nu22b2d0idoccfcg2uoq5vhn22js4t1etu@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 09 Jul 2006 00:07:46 -0400, Tom Adkins
> <newton5@remove.comcast.net> Gave us:
>
>>Brian wrote:
>>> Arguing in a newsgroup is like running in the Special Olympics. Even if
>>> you
>>> win you are still retarded.
>>>
>>>

> Except that he and I were not arguing.
>
> I think it is a retarded remark. These groups are specifically for
> discussion and debate. An argument IS a debate.

 

Do you really believe ANYBODY can predict the temperature in several years?
They can't even predict the temperature for next week, with any sort of
accuracy. Watch any weather forecaster that presents the daily temperature
range against temperature records. Day after day you will note the
temperature on any particular day is seldom a record high temperature,
indicting some tome in the past it was warmer. LOL

mike hunt


"Jonny" <spamyourself@blackworm.net> wrote in message
news:BjErg.4582$PE1.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
> "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
> news:yG9rg.3997$ye3.726@newsread1.news.pas.earthli nk.net...
>> Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>> injects into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is
>> no way that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>
>
> You can fix the pollutant aspects today. Nothing long range overall
> weather temp will change for years. Stuff happens very slowly, and reacts
> the same way. Over the heads of many, not insinuating you as one of these
> individuals.
> --
> Jonny
>

 

Do you really believe ANYBODY can predict the temperature in several years?
They can't even predict the temperature for next week, with any sort of
accuracy. Watch any weather forecaster that presents the daily temperature
range against temperature records. Day after day you will note the
temperature on any particular day is seldom a record high temperature,
indicting some tome in the past it was warmer. LOL

mike hunt


"Jonny" <spamyourself@blackworm.net> wrote in message
news:BjErg.4582$PE1.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
> "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
> news:yG9rg.3997$ye3.726@newsread1.news.pas.earthli nk.net...
>> Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>> injects into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is
>> no way that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>
>
> You can fix the pollutant aspects today. Nothing long range overall
> weather temp will change for years. Stuff happens very slowly, and reacts
> the same way. Over the heads of many, not insinuating you as one of these
> individuals.
> --
> Jonny
>

 

Do you really believe ANYBODY can predict the temperature in several years?
They can't even predict the temperature for next week, with any sort of
accuracy. Watch any weather forecaster that presents the daily temperature
range against temperature records. Day after day you will note the
temperature on any particular day is seldom a record high temperature,
indicting some tome in the past it was warmer. LOL

mike hunt


"Jonny" <spamyourself@blackworm.net> wrote in message
news:BjErg.4582$PE1.4024@newsread2.news.pas.earthl ink.net...
> "grinder" <seagle@earthlink.invalid> wrote in message
> news:yG9rg.3997$ye3.726@newsread1.news.pas.earthli nk.net...
>> Global warming is over and the 77 million tons of carbon dioxide man
>> injects into the atmosphere every DAY contributes to it. To say there is
>> no way that amount can be reduced is laughable.
>>
>
> You can fix the pollutant aspects today. Nothing long range overall
> weather temp will change for years. Stuff happens very slowly, and reacts
> the same way. Over the heads of many, not insinuating you as one of these
> individuals.
> --
> Jonny
>

 

Theres actualkly a journalist in the local paper whos name is mike hunt

Mike Hunter wrote:
> Why then has it gotten smaller and then larger on occasion? How long has
> the hole been there? 20 years, 200 years, 2,000,000? Who knows? How do
> they know?
>
> If ozone is 'good' why do we fine companies, like steel companies the use
> electric furnaces, that create ozone? Why do we not get mad at God for the
> electrical storms that produces most of the ozone? Why does it smell so
> nice after a storm passes?
>
>
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> news:nkhpa2ll7n8snqtm5ggfvesbhos777r0sq@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:46:45 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>> The only thing more arrogant than thinking man caused global warming
>>> is thinking man can stop it.
>> I think we could fix a hole as it were. The HUGE Ozone hole over
>> Antarctica. That hole was seen from an early shuttle mission (I have
>> the Laser Disc around here somewhere). They ALSO saw a HUGE Chlorine
>> cloud right there with it. A single chlorine molecule can break up
>> several Ozone molecules. We could make huge dirigibles with Chlorine
>> Scrubbers on them to fly around down ther and scoop up all the
>> Chlorine.
>>
>> Then, it wouldn't matter how much we are making up here.. it will
>> all migrate to the southern hemisphere, and get scooped up. VIOLA,
>> all the planet's miseries are gone.
>>
>>> We can throw another virgin in the volcano if we like but we won't
>>> really change nature.
>> I guess what I just described could be thought of in that way...
>>
>> By the way, that is a serious suggestion for a fix.
>> Well... one fix... for one problem.
>
>

 

Theres actualkly a journalist in the local paper whos name is mike hunt

Mike Hunter wrote:
> Why then has it gotten smaller and then larger on occasion? How long has
> the hole been there? 20 years, 200 years, 2,000,000? Who knows? How do
> they know?
>
> If ozone is 'good' why do we fine companies, like steel companies the use
> electric furnaces, that create ozone? Why do we not get mad at God for the
> electrical storms that produces most of the ozone? Why does it smell so
> nice after a storm passes?
>
>
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> news:nkhpa2ll7n8snqtm5ggfvesbhos777r0sq@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:46:45 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>> The only thing more arrogant than thinking man caused global warming
>>> is thinking man can stop it.
>> I think we could fix a hole as it were. The HUGE Ozone hole over
>> Antarctica. That hole was seen from an early shuttle mission (I have
>> the Laser Disc around here somewhere). They ALSO saw a HUGE Chlorine
>> cloud right there with it. A single chlorine molecule can break up
>> several Ozone molecules. We could make huge dirigibles with Chlorine
>> Scrubbers on them to fly around down ther and scoop up all the
>> Chlorine.
>>
>> Then, it wouldn't matter how much we are making up here.. it will
>> all migrate to the southern hemisphere, and get scooped up. VIOLA,
>> all the planet's miseries are gone.
>>
>>> We can throw another virgin in the volcano if we like but we won't
>>> really change nature.
>> I guess what I just described could be thought of in that way...
>>
>> By the way, that is a serious suggestion for a fix.
>> Well... one fix... for one problem.
>
>

 

Theres actualkly a journalist in the local paper whos name is mike hunt

Mike Hunter wrote:
> Why then has it gotten smaller and then larger on occasion? How long has
> the hole been there? 20 years, 200 years, 2,000,000? Who knows? How do
> they know?
>
> If ozone is 'good' why do we fine companies, like steel companies the use
> electric furnaces, that create ozone? Why do we not get mad at God for the
> electrical storms that produces most of the ozone? Why does it smell so
> nice after a storm passes?
>
>
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
> news:nkhpa2ll7n8snqtm5ggfvesbhos777r0sq@4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 16:46:45 -0400, gfretwell@aol.com Gave us:
>>
>>> The only thing more arrogant than thinking man caused global warming
>>> is thinking man can stop it.
>> I think we could fix a hole as it were. The HUGE Ozone hole over
>> Antarctica. That hole was seen from an early shuttle mission (I have
>> the Laser Disc around here somewhere). They ALSO saw a HUGE Chlorine
>> cloud right there with it. A single chlorine molecule can break up
>> several Ozone molecules. We could make huge dirigibles with Chlorine
>> Scrubbers on them to fly around down ther and scoop up all the
>> Chlorine.
>>
>> Then, it wouldn't matter how much we are making up here.. it will
>> all migrate to the southern hemisphere, and get scooped up. VIOLA,
>> all the planet's miseries are gone.
>>
>>> We can throw another virgin in the volcano if we like but we won't
>>> really change nature.
>> I guess what I just described could be thought of in that way...
>>
>> By the way, that is a serious suggestion for a fix.
>> Well... one fix... for one problem.
>
>

 

It was, but I figured the younger crowd would not know what a clown was.
They never heard of a bottle open you know. LOL


mike hunt


"ShoeSalesman" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:ym2sg.13228$MF6.2501@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Mike Hunter wrote:
>> Two cannibals were eating a comedian who fell off a cruse ship. One
>> says; Does he taste funny to you?'
>>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
> I thought it was a clown they were eating....

 

It was, but I figured the younger crowd would not know what a clown was.
They never heard of a bottle open you know. LOL


mike hunt


"ShoeSalesman" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:ym2sg.13228$MF6.2501@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Mike Hunter wrote:
>> Two cannibals were eating a comedian who fell off a cruse ship. One
>> says; Does he taste funny to you?'
>>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
> I thought it was a clown they were eating....

 

It was, but I figured the younger crowd would not know what a clown was.
They never heard of a bottle open you know. LOL


mike hunt


"ShoeSalesman" <no@no.com> wrote in message
news:ym2sg.13228$MF6.2501@tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Mike Hunter wrote:
>> Two cannibals were eating a comedian who fell off a cruse ship. One
>> says; Does he taste funny to you?'
>>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
> I thought it was a clown they were eating....

 

On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:24:30 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:

>If you daddy finds out you are playing with his PC,and using such gutter
>language,on the Usenet he will spank your ***.
>
You could be a little more retarded, but not in this life.

Do you always use the oldest, most lame remark available?

You shouldn't even be in Usenet, little boy. These are adult
groups.

 

On Sun, 9 Jul 2006 18:24:30 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:

>If you daddy finds out you are playing with his PC,and using such gutter
>language,on the Usenet he will spank your ***.
>
You could be a little more retarded, but not in this life.

Do you always use the oldest, most lame remark available?

You shouldn't even be in Usenet, little boy. These are adult
groups.