On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:19:00 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:

>OR better
>
>mike hunt

Top posting Usenet retard! off!

 

I'll try to remember that next time, OK?


mike hunt


"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
news:9shbb2tlfv2mhjioa4b1cnpti0oh87afae@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:19:00 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
> <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:
>
>>OR better
>>
>>mike hunt
>
> Top posting Usenet retard! off!

 

I'll try to remember that next time, OK?


mike hunt


"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
news:9shbb2tlfv2mhjioa4b1cnpti0oh87afae@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:19:00 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
> <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:
>
>>OR better
>>
>>mike hunt
>
> Top posting Usenet retard! off!

 

I'll try to remember that next time, OK?


mike hunt


"Roy L. Fuchs" <roylfuchs@urfargingicehole.org> wrote in message
news:9shbb2tlfv2mhjioa4b1cnpti0oh87afae@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:19:00 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
> <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:
>
>>OR better
>>
>>mike hunt
>
> Top posting Usenet retard! off!

 

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:02:08 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:

>I'll try to remember that next time, OK?

The only thing worse than a ing retard is a blatant ing
retard that acts stupid by choice. You are that retard.

 

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:02:08 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:

>I'll try to remember that next time, OK?

The only thing worse than a ing retard is a blatant ing
retard that acts stupid by choice. You are that retard.

 

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006 14:02:08 -0400, "Mike Hunter"
<mikehunt2@mailcity.com> Gave us:

>I'll try to remember that next time, OK?

The only thing worse than a ing retard is a blatant ing
retard that acts stupid by choice. You are that retard.

 

"Mike Hunter" wrote:

I'll try to remember that next time, OK?
__________________________________

"Roy L. Fuchs" wrote:

The only thing worse than a ing retard
is a blatant ing retard that acts stupid
by choice. You are that retard.
_________________________________

In some minds, profanity trumps logic.

- Rodan.

 

"Mike Hunter" wrote:

I'll try to remember that next time, OK?
__________________________________

"Roy L. Fuchs" wrote:

The only thing worse than a ing retard
is a blatant ing retard that acts stupid
by choice. You are that retard.
_________________________________

In some minds, profanity trumps logic.

- Rodan.

 

"Mike Hunter" wrote:

I'll try to remember that next time, OK?
__________________________________

"Roy L. Fuchs" wrote:

The only thing worse than a ing retard
is a blatant ing retard that acts stupid
by choice. You are that retard.
_________________________________

In some minds, profanity trumps logic.

- Rodan.

 

Rodan wrote:
> _________________________________
>
> In some minds, profanity trumps logic.

LOL. When someone is incapable of arguing intelligently, or when they
are losing an argument, it is common for them to resort to profanity.
And you are right. They use it as a "trump" card.

I try not to read those posts because they do not contribute anything
significant to the issue being discussed (although they can be quite
humorous at times) and they are a waste of my already limited time.

To chime in on the "global warming" issue, it is my belief that the
Earth's temperatures and weather patterns are cyclical. I also believe
they can be only mildly and temporarily affected by catastrophic events
such as large volcanic eruptions or global thermonuclear war. With
that said, we may have an issue with the variable physical size and
temperature of the Sun. Regardless, global temperatures were not set
by man and they cannot be changed by man. Al Gore is nothing more than
a doomsday prophet.

Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Al Gore said over the weekend that global warming is more serious than
terrorism. Unless the is on your plane, then that extra half
a degree doesn't bother you so much." --Jay Leno

 

Rodan wrote:
> _________________________________
>
> In some minds, profanity trumps logic.

LOL. When someone is incapable of arguing intelligently, or when they
are losing an argument, it is common for them to resort to profanity.
And you are right. They use it as a "trump" card.

I try not to read those posts because they do not contribute anything
significant to the issue being discussed (although they can be quite
humorous at times) and they are a waste of my already limited time.

To chime in on the "global warming" issue, it is my belief that the
Earth's temperatures and weather patterns are cyclical. I also believe
they can be only mildly and temporarily affected by catastrophic events
such as large volcanic eruptions or global thermonuclear war. With
that said, we may have an issue with the variable physical size and
temperature of the Sun. Regardless, global temperatures were not set
by man and they cannot be changed by man. Al Gore is nothing more than
a doomsday prophet.

Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Al Gore said over the weekend that global warming is more serious than
terrorism. Unless the is on your plane, then that extra half
a degree doesn't bother you so much." --Jay Leno

 

Rodan wrote:
> _________________________________
>
> In some minds, profanity trumps logic.

LOL. When someone is incapable of arguing intelligently, or when they
are losing an argument, it is common for them to resort to profanity.
And you are right. They use it as a "trump" card.

I try not to read those posts because they do not contribute anything
significant to the issue being discussed (although they can be quite
humorous at times) and they are a waste of my already limited time.

To chime in on the "global warming" issue, it is my belief that the
Earth's temperatures and weather patterns are cyclical. I also believe
they can be only mildly and temporarily affected by catastrophic events
such as large volcanic eruptions or global thermonuclear war. With
that said, we may have an issue with the variable physical size and
temperature of the Sun. Regardless, global temperatures were not set
by man and they cannot be changed by man. Al Gore is nothing more than
a doomsday prophet.

Steve
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Al Gore said over the weekend that global warming is more serious than
terrorism. Unless the is on your plane, then that extra half
a degree doesn't bother you so much." --Jay Leno

 

<steve@websitewarehouse.com> wrote:

..... Earth's temperatures and weather patterns are cyclical.
They could be mildly and temporarily affected by volcanic
eruptions or thermonuclear war. But global temperatures are
not set by man and can not be changed by man. Al Gore is
nothing more than a doomsday prophet.
__________________________________________________ _

It is laughably arrogant for puny man to imagine he has the
power to compete with the forces of nature. It reminds me
of the joke about the masturbating flea floating down the
river on his back, shouting, "Raise the drawbridge!"

Rodan.
__________________________________________________ _


_____________ Coconuts in Wyoming?
_____By Steven Milloy, publisher of JunkScience.com
_______________ June 17, 2004

As natural summer seasonal temperatures rise, global-warming
activists dramatize their cause. Global-climate worry-warts met
this week to convulse about the Bush administration's refusal to
embrace the Kyoto global-warming treaty which clamps down on
emissions of greenhouse gases such as CO2. They hope to
pressure politicians into policy changes. Harvard geochemist
Daniel Schrag said, "It depends on the next election. We can't
expect to change the minds of this administration.

Schrag gave alarmist factoids about atmospheric CO2. He said,
''The current CO2 concentration of 380 ppm is higher than it has
been for 430,000 years. In the next 100 years, unless immediate
action is taken, CO2 levels will rise to 800-1,000 ppm. The last
time CO2 was that high was the Eocene Period, 46 million years
ago. Then there were palm trees in Wyoming, crocodiles in the
Arctic and sea level was at least 300 feet higher than today."

IS ATMOSPHERIC CO2 all that separates us from Eskimo crocodile
wrestling? Hardly. The greenhouse effect (atmospheric warming
from trapping of solar energy) keeps Earth's average temperature
at about 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Without the greenhouse effect,
the Earth's average temperature would be about zero degrees.

About 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is due to WATER VAPOR
of natural origin. Naturally occurring CO2 contributes another 2.39
per cent. Methane, nitrous oxide other gases contribute about 1.5
per cent. Human-caused gases contribute about 0.3 per cent,
including human-caused CO2 at 0.11 per cent.

so about 99.7 percent of the greenhouse effect is due entirely to
nature and about 99.89 percent of the greenhouse effect has
nothing to do with CO2 emissions from human activity.

If human-caused CO2 levels were to triple or quadruple they would
have little effect on global climate. If the CO2-reductions called
for by the Kyoto treaty were implemented, human greenhouse
contributions would be reduced by about 0.03 percent. Atmospheric
physicist Fred Singer says, ''This would have an imperceptible effect
on future temperatures - 1/20 th of a degree by the year 2050."

The Kyoto protocol requires cutting energy use by 30 percent by
2010, with inestimably bad economic impacts. It is easy to see
why U.S. politicians run away from the Kyoto protocol. We don't
need to worry about coconuts in Wyoming so much as the nutty
global warmers who meet each summer in Washington, D.C.
__________________________________________________ ____

 

<steve@websitewarehouse.com> wrote:

..... Earth's temperatures and weather patterns are cyclical.
They could be mildly and temporarily affected by volcanic
eruptions or thermonuclear war. But global temperatures are
not set by man and can not be changed by man. Al Gore is
nothing more than a doomsday prophet.
__________________________________________________ _

It is laughably arrogant for puny man to imagine he has the
power to compete with the forces of nature. It reminds me
of the joke about the masturbating flea floating down the
river on his back, shouting, "Raise the drawbridge!"

Rodan.
__________________________________________________ _


_____________ Coconuts in Wyoming?
_____By Steven Milloy, publisher of JunkScience.com
_______________ June 17, 2004

As natural summer seasonal temperatures rise, global-warming
activists dramatize their cause. Global-climate worry-warts met
this week to convulse about the Bush administration's refusal to
embrace the Kyoto global-warming treaty which clamps down on
emissions of greenhouse gases such as CO2. They hope to
pressure politicians into policy changes. Harvard geochemist
Daniel Schrag said, "It depends on the next election. We can't
expect to change the minds of this administration.

Schrag gave alarmist factoids about atmospheric CO2. He said,
''The current CO2 concentration of 380 ppm is higher than it has
been for 430,000 years. In the next 100 years, unless immediate
action is taken, CO2 levels will rise to 800-1,000 ppm. The last
time CO2 was that high was the Eocene Period, 46 million years
ago. Then there were palm trees in Wyoming, crocodiles in the
Arctic and sea level was at least 300 feet higher than today."

IS ATMOSPHERIC CO2 all that separates us from Eskimo crocodile
wrestling? Hardly. The greenhouse effect (atmospheric warming
from trapping of solar energy) keeps Earth's average temperature
at about 60 degrees Fahrenheit. Without the greenhouse effect,
the Earth's average temperature would be about zero degrees.

About 95 percent of the greenhouse effect is due to WATER VAPOR
of natural origin. Naturally occurring CO2 contributes another 2.39
per cent. Methane, nitrous oxide other gases contribute about 1.5
per cent. Human-caused gases contribute about 0.3 per cent,
including human-caused CO2 at 0.11 per cent.

so about 99.7 percent of the greenhouse effect is due entirely to
nature and about 99.89 percent of the greenhouse effect has
nothing to do with CO2 emissions from human activity.

If human-caused CO2 levels were to triple or quadruple they would
have little effect on global climate. If the CO2-reductions called
for by the Kyoto treaty were implemented, human greenhouse
contributions would be reduced by about 0.03 percent. Atmospheric
physicist Fred Singer says, ''This would have an imperceptible effect
on future temperatures - 1/20 th of a degree by the year 2050."

The Kyoto protocol requires cutting energy use by 30 percent by
2010, with inestimably bad economic impacts. It is easy to see
why U.S. politicians run away from the Kyoto protocol. We don't
need to worry about coconuts in Wyoming so much as the nutty
global warmers who meet each summer in Washington, D.C.
__________________________________________________ ____