GLOBAL WARMING: Gore & Other Nervous Nellies Got Ya Scared? RELAX!
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
>
> Just for the record, are you suggesting that the most recent climate
change
> (what we refer to as "global warming") is a natural trend and that it
would
> be happening even if humans were not around?
>
>
You got it.
Richard
> Just for the record, are you suggesting that the most recent climate
change
> (what we refer to as "global warming") is a natural trend and that it
would
> be happening even if humans were not around?
>
>
You got it.
Richard
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3s86b2pv3elvkvpmktinrkdtj56fd71mpd@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:25:04 GMT, "John" <jad@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> >I understand that the earth has undergone climate change before. But
this
> >is different. It's caused by humans in a relatively short period of time.
I and most/many climatologists believe that man is not the driving force
here at all. I'll try to track down a recent symposium on this matter for a
reference. IIRC the consensus opinion of what contributes to climate
change was put as follows: water vapour, water vapour, water vapour, The
rest be it CO2, HFC's, etc, etc are insignificant factors. Popular opinion,
not in you life. After all the politicians , environmentalists, et al want
to lay the blame at the feet of us so they can give the illusion that they
are doing something. The stark reality is that we are powerless in this
matter like it or not. If you want to believe otherwise that is your choice.
Richard
> The only thing different is we are around here writing things down.
> There are lots of climatologists who think other changes were a lot
> more sudden than we were taught.
> Certainly the ones that happened because of volcanos and meteors were
> almost instant in an historic scale.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3s86b2pv3elvkvpmktinrkdtj56fd71mpd@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:25:04 GMT, "John" <jad@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> >I understand that the earth has undergone climate change before. But
this
> >is different. It's caused by humans in a relatively short period of time.
I and most/many climatologists believe that man is not the driving force
here at all. I'll try to track down a recent symposium on this matter for a
reference. IIRC the consensus opinion of what contributes to climate
change was put as follows: water vapour, water vapour, water vapour, The
rest be it CO2, HFC's, etc, etc are insignificant factors. Popular opinion,
not in you life. After all the politicians , environmentalists, et al want
to lay the blame at the feet of us so they can give the illusion that they
are doing something. The stark reality is that we are powerless in this
matter like it or not. If you want to believe otherwise that is your choice.
Richard
> The only thing different is we are around here writing things down.
> There are lots of climatologists who think other changes were a lot
> more sudden than we were taught.
> Certainly the ones that happened because of volcanos and meteors were
> almost instant in an historic scale.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
<gfretwell@aol.com> wrote in message
news:3s86b2pv3elvkvpmktinrkdtj56fd71mpd@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 01:25:04 GMT, "John" <jad@mchsi.com> wrote:
>
> >I understand that the earth has undergone climate change before. But
this
> >is different. It's caused by humans in a relatively short period of time.
I and most/many climatologists believe that man is not the driving force
here at all. I'll try to track down a recent symposium on this matter for a
reference. IIRC the consensus opinion of what contributes to climate
change was put as follows: water vapour, water vapour, water vapour, The
rest be it CO2, HFC's, etc, etc are insignificant factors. Popular opinion,
not in you life. After all the politicians , environmentalists, et al want
to lay the blame at the feet of us so they can give the illusion that they
are doing something. The stark reality is that we are powerless in this
matter like it or not. If you want to believe otherwise that is your choice.
Richard
> The only thing different is we are around here writing things down.
> There are lots of climatologists who think other changes were a lot
> more sudden than we were taught.
> Certainly the ones that happened because of volcanos and meteors were
> almost instant in an historic scale.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
In article <gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com>,
nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
> You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> we can do in this country is negligible.
Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
> You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> we can do in this country is negligible.
Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
In article <gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com>,
nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
> You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> we can do in this country is negligible.
Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
> You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> we can do in this country is negligible.
Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
In article <gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com>,
nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
> You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> we can do in this country is negligible.
Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
> You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> we can do in this country is negligible.
Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
"Some O" <SO@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:SO-6D57AB.22570710072006@news.telus.net...
> In article <gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com>,
> nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
>
> > You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> > the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> > we can do in this country is negligible.
> Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
I do my part at every meal .....to help achieve this goal!
KW
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
"Some O" <SO@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:SO-6D57AB.22570710072006@news.telus.net...
> In article <gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com>,
> nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
>
> > You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> > the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> > we can do in this country is negligible.
> Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
I do my part at every meal .....to help achieve this goal!
KW
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The debate is over.
"Some O" <SO@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:SO-6D57AB.22570710072006@news.telus.net...
> In article <gv1ra2dk2tgpkpk6d0fiv91k30r56odvq0@4ax.com>,
> nothermark <nothermark@not.here> wrote:
>
> > You are correct. However, no one has the guts to depopulate Asia and
> > the Indian sub continent. If you aren't willing to do that the little
> > we can do in this country is negligible.
> Reducing meat producing animals would help a lot.
I do my part at every meal .....to help achieve this goal!
KW