New Law Loopholes
#17
True, this is the exact same I'm affraid of.
ex. they catch me doin 20-30 over, and because my car looks modified, they write me up for something i didnt do, tow my car, suspend my license, etc. I go to court and win, but will they pay me back the money I had to spend for license re-issuing, impound fees?
What if you have a car soo low to the ground? What happens do they call a flat bed?
ex. they catch me doin 20-30 over, and because my car looks modified, they write me up for something i didnt do, tow my car, suspend my license, etc. I go to court and win, but will they pay me back the money I had to spend for license re-issuing, impound fees?
What if you have a car soo low to the ground? What happens do they call a flat bed?
They wont give a shiet about your car. I have picked up my friends car from a towing company the cops used. ITS A JUNK YARD. You know the company who tow your junk car for free?
#18
I know he didn't get me on radar because that number was pulled out of his ***. I've got the summons to attend, then I'll file for trial and get disclosure and go from there I suppose...There's a few hundred people ahead of me, I wonder how long until somebody challenges the law being an infringement on the charter of rights...Of course though, the gov't will NOT reimburse the impound + tow fees. This place is quickly becoming a police state with no regulation...Can't wait to get out of here.
I also have a couple witnesses that were driving behind that can testify in court that I was not doing 66 over.
I also have a couple witnesses that were driving behind that can testify in court that I was not doing 66 over.
#19
Rechecked this - my mistake - item 7 in the 'stunt' definition under HTA reg 455 specifies "Driving a motor vehicle at a rate of speed that is 50 kilometres per hour or more over the speed limit."
If, upon disclosure, it's apparent the officer had no grounds to lay the charge, I'd go further and make a formal complaint regarding the officers conduct in the matter. The intent of the suspension and impoundment powers is clearly spelled out in the law - if officers are not acting in accordance with that intent, they need to be held accountable.
If, upon disclosure, it's apparent the officer had no grounds to lay the charge, I'd go further and make a formal complaint regarding the officers conduct in the matter. The intent of the suspension and impoundment powers is clearly spelled out in the law - if officers are not acting in accordance with that intent, they need to be held accountable.
If the OP knows for the fact that its not on radar, this is a good case to challenge the Charter right.
However as i said about, i highly doubt the cop can be that stupid knowing he would get seriously problem with his supervisor.
#20
If your car is too low for a regular truck, the cop doesnt have to call a flat bed because if its too low for a regular truck, it is after all unsafe for the road, therefore they tow your car like it wasnt even lowered and your stuck with paying for your damaged front bumper, etc.
Cops are ******** so be an back. Theres alot of loopholes through everything, learn them and you'll be free.
Cops are ******** so be an back. Theres alot of loopholes through everything, learn them and you'll be free.
dont talk out of your ***. They will call whatever tow truck is neccesary to do the job because of insurance regulations. Your telling me that if you drive a lambo or 911 they are going to deem your car unsafe if it doesnt fit on a regular tow truck?
anyway. let us know what happened dude. goodluck. radar calibration. look into it
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)