jdm cavalier lights.:S
GTcars Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,027
From: GTA
Rep Power: 0 
Originally Posted by urafag
can somebody explain this to me plz 
your attempt at a funny and bashing thread has failed... nice try tho.
Last edited by StealthZ; Mar 17, 2006 at 03:29 AM.
GTcars Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,027
From: GTA
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by B6T
^ Think of the number of times you've tried to be funny by insulting a Civic or something like that in another thread... hypocrite.
Skilled GTcars Poster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Honestly the cavalier bashing is getting lame. Im not the biggest fan of the cavys or sunfires. But a stock z24 or sunfire GT is not a bad looking car at all. Has alote better looks then a civic. With proper maintence these cars hold up just fine. Of coarse the interior pieces are not of lexus quality but thats why you pay so little for them. So everyone needs to just shut the **** up and stop saying "oh a friend of mine had one and it blew up" thats a total crock. Half of you would never say this to anyone in person.
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
Honestly the cavalier bashing is getting lame. Im not the biggest fan of the cavys or sunfires. But a stock z24 or sunfire GT is not a bad looking car at all. Has alote better looks then a civic. With proper maintence these cars hold up just fine. Of coarse the interior pieces are not of lexus quality but thats why you pay so little for them. So everyone needs to just shut the **** up and stop saying "oh a friend of mine had one and it blew up" thats a total crock. Half of you would never say this to anyone in person.
Stock Z24's, and Sunfire GT's aren't bad looking cars, but the sunfire's are useless. You can't fit a laundry basket through the trunk opening. However, the trunk is huge. Just the opening. I've got a buddy who has a nice 1992 RS 3.1l, and he loves it. It's getting a little rusty, but so what. It's 15 years old, and a daily driver. it's got over 340,000 kms on it.
Thread Starter
Junior GTcars Poster
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 369
From: toronto
Rep Power: 0 
lol i didnot mean to bash cavalier , to be honest i dont care enough about this car to be bashing it or the opposite. i just uneducatedly pointed out the fact that somebody said JDM CAVALIER. but now thanks to these baords i got educated on the fact there cavalier is built by toyota 
which is very surprising to me 
thanks
which is very surprising to me thanks
Junior GTcars Poster
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Rep Power: 776 
Built by GM and shipped, if Toyota built some Cavaliers and all the bodypanel gap dissapeared Oshawa would have some 'splainin to do.
For that matter a Honda Fit is as much similar to an Echo as a Focus is to a Civic.
For that matter a Honda Fit is as much similar to an Echo as a Focus is to a Civic.
Skilled GTcars Poster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by sky_kid
Built by GM and shipped, if Toyota built some Cavaliers and all the bodypanel gap dissapeared Oshawa would have some 'splainin to do.
For that matter a Honda Fit is as much similar to an Echo as a Focus is to a Civic.
For that matter a Honda Fit is as much similar to an Echo as a Focus is to a Civic.
actually in some areas the civic gaps are comparable to a cavalier or sunfire. Toytoa echo panel gaps are of 1995 saturn quality.
Junior GTcars Poster
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Rep Power: 776
I dunno, I dont think anything can compare to the fit and finish of gm cars, nothing lines up properly. Not talking out of my *** here, take a good close look at a new impala or something, its horrible. 
edit: I dont just mean things like the trunk not being snug or anything like that. GM's have strange things like the top and bottom of the door will be only maybe 5mm gap, but then around the middle it will be more like 17mm. Alot of the panels just dont seem to be the right shape. Man, look at the 2000's era buick centurys, the tailights dont even come close to fitting, on the edges there is a gap of almost an inch O_o. So I dont really think its build quality, as much as design. IMHO the problem with GM, is that all the different parts on their vehicles seemed to be designed by people in different citys and at the end they all meet up, put it all together and say 'hey it looks close enough from 10 feet away' and they run with it.
edit: I dont just mean things like the trunk not being snug or anything like that. GM's have strange things like the top and bottom of the door will be only maybe 5mm gap, but then around the middle it will be more like 17mm. Alot of the panels just dont seem to be the right shape. Man, look at the 2000's era buick centurys, the tailights dont even come close to fitting, on the edges there is a gap of almost an inch O_o. So I dont really think its build quality, as much as design. IMHO the problem with GM, is that all the different parts on their vehicles seemed to be designed by people in different citys and at the end they all meet up, put it all together and say 'hey it looks close enough from 10 feet away' and they run with it.
Last edited by sky_kid; Mar 18, 2006 at 07:52 PM.
Skilled GTcars Poster
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 763
Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted by sky_kid
I dunno, I dont think anything can compare to the fit and finish of gm cars, nothing lines up properly. Not talking out of my *** here, take a good close look at a new impala or something, its horrible.
edit: I dont just mean things like the trunk not being snug or anything like that. GM's have strange things like the top and bottom of the door will be only maybe 5mm gap, but then around the middle it will be more like 17mm. Alot of the panels just dont seem to be the right shape. Man, look at the 2000's era buick centurys, the tailights dont even come close to fitting, on the edges there is a gap of almost an inch O_o. So I dont really think its build quality, as much as design. IMHO the problem with GM, is that all the different parts on their vehicles seemed to be designed by people in different citys and at the end they all meet up, put it all together and say 'hey it looks close enough from 10 feet away' and they run with it.
edit: I dont just mean things like the trunk not being snug or anything like that. GM's have strange things like the top and bottom of the door will be only maybe 5mm gap, but then around the middle it will be more like 17mm. Alot of the panels just dont seem to be the right shape. Man, look at the 2000's era buick centurys, the tailights dont even come close to fitting, on the edges there is a gap of almost an inch O_o. So I dont really think its build quality, as much as design. IMHO the problem with GM, is that all the different parts on their vehicles seemed to be designed by people in different citys and at the end they all meet up, put it all together and say 'hey it looks close enough from 10 feet away' and they run with it.
WTF are you on? Most if not all New GM cars have exelent panel and door alignment. I have a 06 impala SS in my driveway. The g6 , colbalt , monte carlo and grand prix all have exelent build quality. Honda is definatley worse in alote of areas.
