|
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 28, 12:17 pm, Hachiroku <Tru...@AE86.gts> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:47:25 +0000, Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > > > Hachiroku wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: > > >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > >>>is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned > >>>nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never > >>>went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. > > >> Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 > >> miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next > >> best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. > > >> The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones > >> crying for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power > >> plants. > > >> Can't have it ALL ways, people! > > > That's for sure. > > > To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is > > operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later > > canceled. > > > That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy > > independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of > > fossil fuels. > > Wind power is excellent, and after the intial outlay, it's free. > I don't know why the Cruchies/Granolas in Western Mass have such an > aversion to it. > > > > > I'm afraid that we have lost our way and are doomed to a role of third > > world status and already have made considerable progress in that > > direction. > > > Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a benevolent > > dictator than our current free for all form of government. At least we > > would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that never seems > > to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... > > > JT > > Problem is, WHO? Hitlary? BWAHAHAHA! > > Anyone who gets in there will either sway with his/her particular 'group', > or not pay attention to anyone and probably end up power hungry. > > It's supposed to be Majority Rule, but the fact is, the Squeaky Wheel gets > greased, and the Squeaky Wheel are usually the k00ks... The squeaky wheels ARE the majority. We the people really are this dumb. Power doens't corrupt, it attracts the corruptible. Big Bill Clinton was murdering threats, raping interns and selling out this country before he was even elected governor. who would want to be president? Only scum would be willing to take the job. |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 28, 12:17 pm, Hachiroku <Tru...@AE86.gts> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:47:25 +0000, Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > > > Hachiroku wrote: > >> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: > > >>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It > >>>is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned > >>>nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never > >>>went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. > > >> Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 > >> miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next > >> best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. > > >> The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones > >> crying for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power > >> plants. > > >> Can't have it ALL ways, people! > > > That's for sure. > > > To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is > > operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later > > canceled. > > > That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy > > independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of > > fossil fuels. > > Wind power is excellent, and after the intial outlay, it's free. > I don't know why the Cruchies/Granolas in Western Mass have such an > aversion to it. > > > > > I'm afraid that we have lost our way and are doomed to a role of third > > world status and already have made considerable progress in that > > direction. > > > Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a benevolent > > dictator than our current free for all form of government. At least we > > would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that never seems > > to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... > > > JT > > Problem is, WHO? Hitlary? BWAHAHAHA! > > Anyone who gets in there will either sway with his/her particular 'group', > or not pay attention to anyone and probably end up power hungry. > > It's supposed to be Majority Rule, but the fact is, the Squeaky Wheel gets > greased, and the Squeaky Wheel are usually the k00ks... The squeaky wheels ARE the majority. We the people really are this dumb. Power doens't corrupt, it attracts the corruptible. Big Bill Clinton was murdering threats, raping interns and selling out this country before he was even elected governor. who would want to be president? Only scum would be willing to take the job. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 28, 12:14 pm, Hachiroku <Tru...@AE86.gts> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:08:15 -0700, bill wrote: > > solution is easy. Drill in anwr to buy a little time, build > > nuclear power plants to replace the coal and natural gas plants, Build > > coal to liquid plants and gas to liquid plants to cover the next 30 or 50 > > years, and start heavy research on PHEVs while realigning our development > > style to support public transportation. it's simple, it's feasible, and > > it would work. we are not doing it for the same reason we aren't doing > > anything else, we are simply too dumb. > > The only problem with these ideas, Bill: > > They exhibit Common Sense. It'sll never fly. > > And tell me the Democrats aren't just as connected to the oil companies as > the Republicans. > > At the end of the day, in the smokey back rooms and the brandy flowing, > it's all just the Good Old Boys Club... you give them too much credit. if they had the levels of control and foresight you are crediting them with, there would be no reason for concern. This situation happened not because some plutocrats decided it should happen, it happened because a bunch of small minded little maggots no different from you and I decided that the alternatives SHOULDN'T happen. floats. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 28, 12:14 pm, Hachiroku <Tru...@AE86.gts> wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 08:08:15 -0700, bill wrote: > > solution is easy. Drill in anwr to buy a little time, build > > nuclear power plants to replace the coal and natural gas plants, Build > > coal to liquid plants and gas to liquid plants to cover the next 30 or 50 > > years, and start heavy research on PHEVs while realigning our development > > style to support public transportation. it's simple, it's feasible, and > > it would work. we are not doing it for the same reason we aren't doing > > anything else, we are simply too dumb. > > The only problem with these ideas, Bill: > > They exhibit Common Sense. It'sll never fly. > > And tell me the Democrats aren't just as connected to the oil companies as > the Republicans. > > At the end of the day, in the smokey back rooms and the brandy flowing, > it's all just the Good Old Boys Club... you give them too much credit. if they had the levels of control and foresight you are crediting them with, there would be no reason for concern. This situation happened not because some plutocrats decided it should happen, it happened because a bunch of small minded little maggots no different from you and I decided that the alternatives SHOULDN'T happen. floats. |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Enrico Fermi wrote:
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message > news:1i1Vi.290291$ax1.99282@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... >> >> Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: >>> >>> >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear >>>> power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went >>>> operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. >>> >>> >>> Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 >>> miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next >>> best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. The funny thing >>> is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying >>> for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. >>> Can't have it ALL ways, people! >>> >> >> >> That's for sure. >> >> To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is >> operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later >> canceled. >> >> That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy >> independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of >> fossil fuels. >> >> I'm afraid that we have lost our way and are doomed to a role of third >> world status and already have made considerable progress in that >> direction. >> >> Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a benevolent >> dictator than our current free for all form of government. At least we >> would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that never seems >> to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... >> >> JT > > "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be > the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under > omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, > his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our > own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of > their own conscience." > -- C.S. Lewis Lewis underestimates the all encompassing nature of greed. Genetics suggests an endless supply of wannabe "robber barons" and history show no record of any "satiation point." Lewis described his younger self as "very angry with God for not existing". Apparently when he discovered God he then channeled his anger towards what he saw in Church on Sunday ("those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end"). And sure enough, in a rigged game with that pesky mortality always playing in the background he finds plenty to agree. And disagree. |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Enrico Fermi wrote:
> "Grumpy AuContraire" <Grumpy@ExtraGrumpyville.com> wrote in message > news:1i1Vi.290291$ax1.99282@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net... >> >> Hachiroku ???? wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: >>> >>> >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear >>>> power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never went >>>> operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. >>> >>> >>> Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 >>> miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next >>> best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. The funny thing >>> is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones crying >>> for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power plants. >>> Can't have it ALL ways, people! >>> >> >> >> That's for sure. >> >> To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is >> operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later >> canceled. >> >> That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy >> independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of >> fossil fuels. >> >> I'm afraid that we have lost our way and are doomed to a role of third >> world status and already have made considerable progress in that >> direction. >> >> Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a benevolent >> dictator than our current free for all form of government. At least we >> would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that never seems >> to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... >> >> JT > > "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be > the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under > omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep, > his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our > own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of > their own conscience." > -- C.S. Lewis Lewis underestimates the all encompassing nature of greed. Genetics suggests an endless supply of wannabe "robber barons" and history show no record of any "satiation point." Lewis described his younger self as "very angry with God for not existing". Apparently when he discovered God he then channeled his anger towards what he saw in Church on Sunday ("those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end"). And sure enough, in a rigged game with that pesky mortality always playing in the background he finds plenty to agree. And disagree. |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Hachiroku ハチク wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:47:25 +0000, Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > >> >> Hachiroku ハチク wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: >>> >>> >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never >>>> went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. >>> >>> >>> Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 >>> miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next >>> best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. >>> >>> The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones >>> crying for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power >>> plants. >>> >>> Can't have it ALL ways, people! >>> >>> >> >> That's for sure. >> >> To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is >> operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later >> canceled. >> >> That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy >> independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of >> fossil fuels. > > > Wind power is excellent, and after the intial outlay, it's free. > I don't know why the Cruchies/Granolas in Western Mass have such an > aversion to it. It will be widely used as soon as the multinationals and other corporate "trickle up" ideologists can figure out a way to corner the market and sell it. At a price you can afford of course. ;) |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Hachiroku ハチク wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:47:25 +0000, Grumpy AuContraire wrote: > >> >> Hachiroku ハチク wrote: >>> On Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:46:56 -0700, bill wrote: >>> >>> >>>> In the town where I live, there is a planned 500 MW windfarm. It >>>> is being hotly disputed on NIMBY grounds. The most recent planned >>>> nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and never >>>> went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to stop. >>> >>> >>> Are you in Mass by any chance? There was one that was killed about 15 >>> miles from where I live, and the company went further west to the next >>> best site, where they are also meeting strong opposition. >>> >>> The funny thing is, the one posing the opposition are also the ones >>> crying for independance from Foreign Oil and coal and nuclear power >>> plants. >>> >>> Can't have it ALL ways, people! >>> >>> >> >> That's for sure. >> >> To clarify, the original Seabrook (Unit 1) was completed and is >> operational today. It is Unit 2 that was never completed and later >> canceled. >> >> That said, nuclear power is the only interim option for energy >> independence or at least a reduction in dependence on foreign sources of >> fossil fuels. > > > Wind power is excellent, and after the intial outlay, it's free. > I don't know why the Cruchies/Granolas in Western Mass have such an > aversion to it. It will be widely used as soon as the multinationals and other corporate "trickle up" ideologists can figure out a way to corner the market and sell it. At a price you can afford of course. ;) |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
> Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a > benevolent dictator than our current free for all form of government. At > least we would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that > never seems to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... George...., is that you????? |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
Grumpy AuContraire wrote:
> Sometimes, I think that the country would be better off under a > benevolent dictator than our current free for all form of government. At > least we would not be subject to continuous political bombardment that > never seems to end or ever produces anything of worth for that matter... George...., is that you????? |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
> | you give them too much credit. if they had the levels of
> | control and foresight you are crediting them with, there would be > | no reason for concern. This situation happened not because some > | plutocrats decided it should happen, it happened because a bunch of > | small minded little maggots no different from you and I decided > | that the alternatives SHOULDN'T happen. floats. > > Hmm. Perhaps it'd be worth taking a shot at doing what needs to be > done on whatever scale you can. > > Pick something you (or you plus whoever you can talk into working with > you) have a reasonable shot at success. Just /do/ it! It won't be a > nuclear power plant (probably) but it'll be better than nothing. > > Me? I build solar heating panels (good ones) to keep people warm > without electricity/oil/gas. It's not much, but it's something - > better than nothing. > > Were you waiting for permission? Or are we all sitting around waiting > for someone /else/ to do the job? Building cogen plants for residential heating/ grid tied electric. Also working on a PHEV retrofit for existing cars meself. Course, one of those will prolly land me in jail, but so be it. Course, if I and a million like me all did the best we could do, it still wouldn't amount to one nuclear reactors worth of difference, but hey, like you said, it's what I can do. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
> | you give them too much credit. if they had the levels of
> | control and foresight you are crediting them with, there would be > | no reason for concern. This situation happened not because some > | plutocrats decided it should happen, it happened because a bunch of > | small minded little maggots no different from you and I decided > | that the alternatives SHOULDN'T happen. floats. > > Hmm. Perhaps it'd be worth taking a shot at doing what needs to be > done on whatever scale you can. > > Pick something you (or you plus whoever you can talk into working with > you) have a reasonable shot at success. Just /do/ it! It won't be a > nuclear power plant (probably) but it'll be better than nothing. > > Me? I build solar heating panels (good ones) to keep people warm > without electricity/oil/gas. It's not much, but it's something - > better than nothing. > > Were you waiting for permission? Or are we all sitting around waiting > for someone /else/ to do the job? Building cogen plants for residential heating/ grid tied electric. Also working on a PHEV retrofit for existing cars meself. Course, one of those will prolly land me in jail, but so be it. Course, if I and a million like me all did the best we could do, it still wouldn't amount to one nuclear reactors worth of difference, but hey, like you said, it's what I can do. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
| you give them too much credit. if they had the levels of | control and foresight you are crediting them with, there would be | no reason for concern. This situation happened not because some | plutocrats decided it should happen, it happened because a bunch of | small minded little maggots no different from you and I decided | that the alternatives SHOULDN'T happen. floats. Hmm. Perhaps it'd be worth taking a shot at doing what needs to be done on whatever scale you can. Pick something you (or you plus whoever you can talk into working with you) have a reasonable shot at success. Just /do/ it! It won't be a nuclear power plant (probably) but it'll be better than nothing. Me? I build solar heating panels (good ones) to keep people warm without electricity/oil/gas. It's not much, but it's something - better than nothing. Were you waiting for permission? Or are we all sitting around waiting for someone /else/ to do the job? -- Morris Dovey DeSoto Solar DeSoto, Iowa USA http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/ |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
| you give them too much credit. if they had the levels of | control and foresight you are crediting them with, there would be | no reason for concern. This situation happened not because some | plutocrats decided it should happen, it happened because a bunch of | small minded little maggots no different from you and I decided | that the alternatives SHOULDN'T happen. floats. Hmm. Perhaps it'd be worth taking a shot at doing what needs to be done on whatever scale you can. Pick something you (or you plus whoever you can talk into working with you) have a reasonable shot at success. Just /do/ it! It won't be a nuclear power plant (probably) but it'll be better than nothing. Me? I build solar heating panels (good ones) to keep people warm without electricity/oil/gas. It's not much, but it's something - better than nothing. Were you waiting for permission? Or are we all sitting around waiting for someone /else/ to do the job? -- Morris Dovey DeSoto Solar DeSoto, Iowa USA http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/ |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
F.H. wrote:
> Enrico Fermi wrote: >> "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may >> be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons >> than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may >> sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those >> who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they >> do so with the approval of their own conscience." >> -- C.S. Lewis > > Lewis underestimates the all encompassing nature of greed. Genetics > suggests an endless supply of wannabe "robber barons" and history show > no record of any "satiation point." > > Lewis described his younger self as "very angry with God for not > existing". Apparently when he discovered God he then channeled his > anger towards what he saw in Church on Sunday ("those who torment us for > our own good will torment us without end"). > > And sure enough, in a rigged game with that pesky mortality always > playing in the background he finds plenty to agree. And disagree. Good an evil are human inventions. It has been a long time since I read C.S.Lewis. He did seem to have suffered the deeper implications of god and morality. If anyone that has read Lewis and hasn't read 'The Screwtape Letters', I highly recommend it... |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands