|
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
"Arnold Walker" <arnoldwalker@consolidated.net> wrote in message
news:1193948843_31@sp6iad.superfeed.net... > It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing.The > public looks at the opposition ,shielding you to run right behind the view > with even more of the very dirty deed that you accused the opposition of > doing. > I wonder why congress has a 13% aprroval rating.....Another 7% and they > might get more trust than a used car sellman. It's contagious: http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...eum/index.html |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net>
wrote: > "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message > > news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com... > > > On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: > > >>On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: > > >>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney > >>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is > >>> bashing Bush.- > > >>Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. > > >>Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban > >>By Robert Scheer > >>Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times > > >>Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy > >>every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush > >>administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up > >>as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this > >>nation still takes seriously. > > > There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing > > Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I > > believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at > > least, President of parts of Kabul. > > > I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug > > considerations. > > Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady > Bird > was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies > straight. > Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the > portfolio she was shedding when she > started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC > members she muscled to allow > her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in > the very thing ....they bad mouth. > It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious of. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net>
wrote: > "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message > > news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com... > > > On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: > > >>On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: > > >>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney > >>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is > >>> bashing Bush.- > > >>Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. > > >>Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban > >>By Robert Scheer > >>Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times > > >>Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy > >>every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush > >>administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up > >>as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this > >>nation still takes seriously. > > > There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing > > Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I > > believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at > > least, President of parts of Kabul. > > > I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug > > considerations. > > Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady > Bird > was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies > straight. > Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the > portfolio she was shedding when she > started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC > members she muscled to allow > her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in > the very thing ....they bad mouth. > It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious of. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
> On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> > wrote: >> "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message >> >> news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com... >> >>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: >>>> On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: >>>>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney >>>>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is >>>>> bashing Bush.- >>>> Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. >>>> Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban >>>> By Robert Scheer >>>> Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times >>>> Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy >>>> every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush >>>> administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up >>>> as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this >>>> nation still takes seriously. >>> There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing >>> Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I >>> believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at >>> least, President of parts of Kabul. >>> I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug >>> considerations. >> Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady >> Bird >> was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies >> straight. >> Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the >> portfolio she was shedding when she >> started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC >> members she muscled to allow >> her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in >> the very thing ....they bad mouth. >> It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. > > this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to > know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious > of. So..., righty's are lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the working class? |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
> On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> > wrote: >> "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message >> >> news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com... >> >>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: >>>> On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: >>>>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney >>>>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is >>>>> bashing Bush.- >>>> Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. >>>> Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban >>>> By Robert Scheer >>>> Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times >>>> Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy >>>> every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush >>>> administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up >>>> as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this >>>> nation still takes seriously. >>> There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing >>> Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I >>> believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at >>> least, President of parts of Kabul. >>> I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug >>> considerations. >> Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady >> Bird >> was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies >> straight. >> Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the >> portfolio she was shedding when she >> started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC >> members she muscled to allow >> her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in >> the very thing ....they bad mouth. >> It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. > > this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to > know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious > of. So..., righty's are lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the working class? |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Nov 1, 4:56 pm, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote:
> bill wrote: > > On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> > > wrote: > >> "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message > > >>news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com. .. > > >>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: > >>>> On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: > >>>>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney > >>>>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is > >>>>> bashing Bush.- > >>>> Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. > >>>> Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban > >>>> By Robert Scheer > >>>> Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times > >>>> Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy > >>>> every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush > >>>> administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up > >>>> as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this > >>>> nation still takes seriously. > >>> There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing > >>> Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I > >>> believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at > >>> least, President of parts of Kabul. > >>> I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug > >>> considerations. > >> Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady > >> Bird > >> was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies > >> straight. > >> Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the > >> portfolio she was shedding when she > >> started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC > >> members she muscled to allow > >> her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in > >> the very thing ....they bad mouth. > >> It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. > > > this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to > > know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious > > of. > > So..., righty's are lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the > working class? A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger. However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger. B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of promising things they cannot deliver. Ever looked at the promises of a vendor? YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation, believe them. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Nov 1, 4:56 pm, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote:
> bill wrote: > > On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> > > wrote: > >> "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message > > >>news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com. .. > > >>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: > >>>> On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: > >>>>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney > >>>>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is > >>>>> bashing Bush.- > >>>> Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. > >>>> Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban > >>>> By Robert Scheer > >>>> Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times > >>>> Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy > >>>> every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush > >>>> administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up > >>>> as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this > >>>> nation still takes seriously. > >>> There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing > >>> Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I > >>> believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at > >>> least, President of parts of Kabul. > >>> I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug > >>> considerations. > >> Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady > >> Bird > >> was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies > >> straight. > >> Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the > >> portfolio she was shedding when she > >> started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC > >> members she muscled to allow > >> her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in > >> the very thing ....they bad mouth. > >> It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. > > > this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to > > know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious > > of. > > So..., righty's are lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the > working class? A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger. However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger. B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of promising things they cannot deliver. Ever looked at the promises of a vendor? YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation, believe them. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
> On Nov 1, 4:56 pm, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote: >> bill wrote: >>> On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> >>> wrote: >>>> "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message >>>> news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com... >>>>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: >>>>>> On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney >>>>>>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is >>>>>>> bashing Bush.- >>>>>> Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. >>>>>> Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban >>>>>> By Robert Scheer >>>>>> Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times >>>>>> Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy >>>>>> every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush >>>>>> administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up >>>>>> as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this >>>>>> nation still takes seriously. >>>>> There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing >>>>> Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I >>>>> believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at >>>>> least, President of parts of Kabul. >>>>> I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug >>>>> considerations. >>>> Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady >>>> Bird >>>> was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies >>>> straight. >>>> Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the >>>> portfolio she was shedding when she >>>> started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC >>>> members she muscled to allow >>>> her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in >>>> the very thing ....they bad mouth. >>>> It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. >>> this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to >>> know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious >>> of. >> So..., righty's are lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the >> working class? > > A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you > perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger. Thanks for clearing that up. > However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting > to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger. More likely, they are off your meds. > B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who > want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of > being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of > promising things they cannot deliver. I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm. > Ever looked at the promises of a vendor? Huh? > YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in > the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation, > believe them. Huh? I may need some examples in order to grasp your wisdom. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
> On Nov 1, 4:56 pm, "F.H." <connec...@verizon.net> wrote: >> bill wrote: >>> On Nov 1, 4:34 pm, "Arnold Walker" <arnoldwal...@consolidated.net> >>> wrote: >>>> "dgk" <d...@somewhere.com> wrote in message >>>> news:tg3ki3hshu8gs8kus6ljbrbc9jncbfqr1i@4ax.com... >>>>> On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 07:52:26 -0700, gzuck...@snail-mail.net wrote: >>>>>> On Nov 1, 8:03 am, dgk <d...@somewhere.com> wrote: >>>>>>> I think the poster was pointing out that it isn't just the looney >>>>>>> liberal left that is bashing Bush. Everyone who isn't a moron is >>>>>>> bashing Bush.- >>>>>> Since we're on the topic, here's a blast from the past; note the date. >>>>>> Bush's Faustian Deal With the Taliban >>>>>> By Robert Scheer >>>>>> Published May 22, 2001 in the Los Angeles Times >>>>>> Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists, destroy >>>>>> every vestige of civilization in your homeland, and the Bush >>>>>> administration will embrace you. All that matters is that you line up >>>>>> as an ally in the drug war, the only international cause that this >>>>>> nation still takes seriously. >>>>> There was also that small part involving the Taliban allowing >>>>> Occidental Petroleum, among others, to allow a pipeline or two. I >>>>> believe an executive of OP is now the President of Afghanistan. Or at >>>>> least, President of parts of Kabul. >>>>> I would think that was far more important to the Bushies than drug >>>>> considerations. >>>> Except that Gore's family was with Occidential Petroleum.....just like Lady >>>> Bird >>>> was a charter member of Halaburton.You really need to get your oil companies >>>> straight. >>>> Bush was Standard and Exxon same as Hilary....You should have seen the >>>> portfolio she was shedding when she >>>> started her summer season on the president thing of hers.Or some of the DNC >>>> members she muscled to allow >>>> her to run ,in the first placed.It seems amazing how many Deomcrats are in >>>> the very thing ....they bad mouth. >>>> It is almost like you accuse the opposition of whatever you are doing. >>> this is a fundamental aspect of human nature. If you wish to >>> know what a person is guilty of, look to what they are suspicious >>> of. >> So..., righty's are lazy moochers who want to suckle the of the >> working class? > > A) Being the victim of a crime does not mean that you > perpetrated that crime. being mugged does not make you a mugger. Thanks for clearing that up. > However, if you have not been mugged and suspect everyone of wanting > to mug you, then the odds are, you are a mugger. More likely, they are off your meds. > B) righties do not accuse lefties of being "lazy moochers who > want to suckle the of the working class", they accuse them of > being exploitive of the blind stupidity of the common man and of > promising things they cannot deliver. I don't know where *you* stand (presumably far above the 'stupid common man') but you certainly are not a connoisseur of sarcasm. > Ever looked at the promises of a vendor? Huh? > YES, righties are guilty of promising undeliverables, just not in > the same place as lefties. So, when they make that accusation, > believe them. Huh? I may need some examples in order to grasp your wisdom. |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
snip for space / / / >>> The books really do say those things. >> And much more. ;) > Isn't it wonderful? People actually believe such total crap, > it's a wonder we aren't all dead yet. Dead? Did you say dead? LOL, this brings us back to my earlier suggestion (which you snipped): The book I found that made the most sense to me when trying to understand the human merry go round was the 1973 Pulitzer Prize winner, "Denial of Death" by Ernest Becker. If you scroll down to the reviews you may understand why. http://www.amazon.com/Denial-Death-E.../dp/0684832402 http://tinyurl.com/29wmtb |
Re: (OT:) New Energy Sources... Was: Why do I have such a strongdislike for Ragheads?
bill wrote:
snip for space / / / >>> The books really do say those things. >> And much more. ;) > Isn't it wonderful? People actually believe such total crap, > it's a wonder we aren't all dead yet. Dead? Did you say dead? LOL, this brings us back to my earlier suggestion (which you snipped): The book I found that made the most sense to me when trying to understand the human merry go round was the 1973 Pulitzer Prize winner, "Denial of Death" by Ernest Becker. If you scroll down to the reviews you may understand why. http://www.amazon.com/Denial-Death-E.../dp/0684832402 http://tinyurl.com/29wmtb |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... > > > The most recent planned > > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > > stop. > > It never went operational? Are you sure about that? Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976 and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation of Unit 1 began in 1990." The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast US. See this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and families here in New England. Harry C. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message > > news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... > > > The most recent planned > > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and > > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to > > stop. > > It never went operational? Are you sure about that? Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976 and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation of Unit 1 began in 1990." The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast US. See this link: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and families here in New England. Harry C. |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1193963413.853590.273640@o80g2000hse.googlegr oups.com... > On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... >> >> > The most recent planned >> > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >> > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >> > stop. >> >> It never went operational? Are you sure about that? > > Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976 > and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation > of Unit 1 began in 1990." > > The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors > from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast > US. > > See this link: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant > > If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the > "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back > of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and > families here in New England. > > Harry C. > > > > Probably the same Communists that took over the student unions in the 60's and fed them all the bull they believed. And the same Communists that Teddy owes allegance to. (While his brother John turns over in his grave.) Bad enough we've got Dick the Duck Phucker Durbin (D-Teddy Kennedy Wannabe) over here and Barack Hussein Obama (D-Jack Kennedy Wannabe) Illinois' senatorial delagation is a national embarrasement. But so is New York's, California's, Massechusetts's, etc. I think we ought to go unicameral like Nebraska. Nancy losi is bad enough, And Dingy Harry can't read tea leaves very well. He's forgotten what the conservatives in S.D did to TomDamSh!t. The only way he'll get reelected is if the Outfit buys the votes or exports them from Chicago. . . . Charles of Schaumburg |
Re: (OT:) Why do I have such a strong dislike for Ragheads?
<hhc314@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1193963413.853590.273640@o80g2000hse.googlegr oups.com... > On Oct 27, 8:16 am, "JoeSpareBedroom" <dishborea...@yahoo.com> wrote: >> "bill" <ford_prefec...@hotmail.com> wrote in message >> >> news:1193456816.362356.101020@z9g2000hsf.googlegro ups.com... >> >> > The most recent planned >> > nuclear power plant (seabrook) in the US was fully constructed and >> > never went operational due to environmentalism. This crap has got to >> > stop. >> >> It never went operational? Are you sure about that? > > Actually, "The construction permit for the plant was granted in 1976 > and construction on Unit 1 was completed in 1986. Full power operation > of Unit 1 began in 1990." > > The "Clamshell Alliance" effective prevented the 3 additional reactors > from being placed into operations, a terrible thing for the Northeast > US. > > See this link: > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seabroo...ar_Power_Plant > > If you really want to have some fun, try to find out what or who the > "Clamshell Alliance" is. It will surprise you to learn who was in back > of this terrible conspriacy perpretrated on the home owners and > families here in New England. > > Harry C. > > > > Probably the same Communists that took over the student unions in the 60's and fed them all the bull they believed. And the same Communists that Teddy owes allegance to. (While his brother John turns over in his grave.) Bad enough we've got Dick the Duck Phucker Durbin (D-Teddy Kennedy Wannabe) over here and Barack Hussein Obama (D-Jack Kennedy Wannabe) Illinois' senatorial delagation is a national embarrasement. But so is New York's, California's, Massechusetts's, etc. I think we ought to go unicameral like Nebraska. Nancy losi is bad enough, And Dingy Harry can't read tea leaves very well. He's forgotten what the conservatives in S.D did to TomDamSh!t. The only way he'll get reelected is if the Outfit buys the votes or exports them from Chicago. . . . Charles of Schaumburg |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:26 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands