Kill Stories Talk about a win or a loss.

The Cobalt SS is no more...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2006, 10:59 AM
  #1  
Junior GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
 
civtegra90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 371
Rep Power: 687
civtegra90 street rep is low. keep going
The Cobalt SS is no more...

...than a slow, heavy excuse for a "sports car" as I have beaten one last night with my LS powered 90 civic. I only beat him by about 2 feet, but a win is a win no matter what. When will GM learn that a 200+hp motor does nothing in a huge heavy car.
civtegra90 is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 12:30 PM
  #2  
Average GTcars Poster
 
Charlie_Chaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scarbrough
Posts: 517
Rep Power: 0
Charlie_Chaos can only hope to improve
I think the guy in the Cobalt needs to learn how to drive.

You are correct though. A win is a win. Good driving. :thumbsup:
Charlie_Chaos is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 12:34 PM
  #3  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
sky_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Rep Power: 701
sky_kid street rep is low. keep going
oh no, wait, the SS is a 'sport compact car', so you know, it doesnt have to be that fast. Never mind that the engine has as much power from its 2.2 turbo that most other companys could get from 2.2 liters N/A,

ten years ago.
sky_kid is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 02:03 AM
  #4  
GTcars Regular
 
StealthZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,027
Rep Power: 0
StealthZ has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Originally Posted by civtegra90
...than a slow, heavy excuse for a "sports car" as I have beaten one last night with my LS powered 90 civic. I only beat him by about 2 feet, but a win is a win no matter what. When will GM learn that a 200+hp motor does nothing in a huge heavy car.
haha, supposed to be going to sleep, but this i couldnt pass up. lets compare the new cobalt to the new heap civic (generation 387).

sickvic
2600lb
197hp
139tq

cobalt
2730lb
205hp
200tq

stupid ricer, get a clue.

oh and its supercharged, not turbo. i thought you knew it all, after all, you do own the first civic ever made and think its all hot .

lmao.
StealthZ is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 04:04 AM
  #5  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
goneinsixtyseconds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 319
Rep Power: 707
goneinsixtyseconds street rep is low. keep going
wtf .. another chevy vs. honda thread

if we're talking about the new supercharged cobalt ss vs. the new civic si, than any 1/4 mile race will be pretty much a drivers battle, but i'd put money on the civic to be better performing in the corners on the track.

(taken from road and track)
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...data_panel.pdf
http://www.roadandtrack.com/assets/d...data_panel.pdf

2005 Chevrolet Cobalt SS (Supercharged) $24,195
Curb Weight - 2970 lbs
Test Weight - 3145 lbs
Horsepower - 205 bhp @ 5600 rpm
Torque - 200 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
1/4 mile - 14.8 @ 96.8 mph

2006 Honda Civic Si - $26,080
Curb Weight - 2880 lbs
Test Weight - 3060 lbs
Horsepower - 197 bhp @ 7800 rpm
Torque - 139 lb-ft @ 6200 rpm
1/4 mile - 15.0 @ 95.6 mph

if it were me, i'd still choose the civic over the cobalt, why? for only 2 grand more you can have the peace of mind over issues such as build quality, reliability, but more importantly ... DEPRECIATION. i'll be happy to know that my car won't be worth as much as a mcdeal at mcdonalds 5 years down the line as most chevy's are now-a-days.
goneinsixtyseconds is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 07:20 AM
  #6  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
sky_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Rep Power: 701
sky_kid street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by StealthZ
haha, supposed to be going to sleep, but this i couldnt pass up. lets compare the new cobalt to the new heap civic (generation 387).

sickvic
2600lb
197hp
139tq

cobalt
2730lb
205hp
200tq

stupid ricer, get a clue.

oh and its supercharged, not turbo. i thought you knew it all, after all, you do own the first civic ever made and think its all hot .

lmao.

I don't really care enough about GM to actually know what they are selling anymore, but your right, GM gets 5 more horsepower out of a 2.2 supercharged engine then honda is getting out of a 2.0 n/a motor.


go gm?
sky_kid is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 10:26 AM
  #7  
GTcars Regular
 
StealthZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: GTA
Posts: 1,027
Rep Power: 0
StealthZ has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Originally Posted by sky_kid
I don't really care enough about GM to actually know what they are selling anymore, but your right, GM gets 5 more horsepower out of a 2.2 supercharged engine then honda is getting out of a 2.0 n/a motor.


go gm?
thats whats funny about you honda guys, you never mention torque. poor poor honda, will never know what its like to have some.

go honda?
StealthZ is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 11:07 AM
  #8  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
sleepy GSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Woodbridge
Posts: 345
Rep Power: 692
sleepy GSR street rep is low. keep going
funny thing is that even with 60 or so less pounds of torque the honda is only 0.2 seconds slower in the 1/4 mile, so all your torque (and i know it is pretty usefull sometimes) doesnt play a major role here.
sleepy GSR is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 12:57 PM
  #9  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Beerbaron105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 700
Beerbaron105 street rep is low. keep going
newbies
*rolls eyes*
Beerbaron105 is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 12:59 PM
  #10  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Beerbaron105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 700
Beerbaron105 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by civtegra90
...than a slow, heavy excuse for a "sports car" as I have beaten one last night with my LS powered 90 civic. I only beat him by about 2 feet, but a win is a win no matter what. When will GM learn that a 200+hp motor does nothing in a huge heavy car.

depends what you want in a car

do you want a shitbox civic thats 16 years old?

or do you want a brand new car with leather, 7 spkr mp3 stereo, 10 inch woofer, sunroof, power all around, 18 inch wheels?
Beerbaron105 is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 01:23 PM
  #11  
Junior GTcars Poster
 
sky_kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 349
Rep Power: 701
sky_kid street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by Beerbaron105
depends what you want in a car

do you want a shitbox civic thats 16 years old?

or do you want a brand new car with leather, 7 spkr mp3 stereo, 10 inch woofer, sunroof, power all around, 18 inch wheels?

huh, well,
um

Old civic (1996)



And uhhh, 2006 Cobalt SS




Maybe its just me : i have the flu so I might be seeing things >_>
sky_kid is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 01:52 PM
  #12  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
Beerbaron105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 32
Rep Power: 700
Beerbaron105 street rep is low. keep going
Originally Posted by sky_kid
huh, well,
um

Old civic (1996)



And uhhh, 2006 Cobalt SS




Maybe its just me : i have the flu so I might be seeing things >_>
are you trying to say they look alike? i see no resemblance
plus when did a civic come with two-tone leather, mp3 stereo, supercharged 2.0L, 18 inch wheels, oil life meter, factory performance upgrades?
Beerbaron105 is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 02:08 PM
  #13  
Junior GTcars Poster
Thread Starter
 
civtegra90's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 371
Rep Power: 687
civtegra90 street rep is low. keep going
you people are all high, this wasnt supposed to be a chevy vs honda thread. i was just saying that i beat the damn thing, we had a great time laughing at the fact that my "shitbox" beat the best compact chevys ever made. does noone have a relevant opinion or do you just wanna spew crap. also, everyone goes on about how much touque the cobalt has, yay for chevy, too bad its a european motor.

oh, and "stuped ricer"? my car is probably the least rice on this site, so shut your **********.
civtegra90 is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 04:07 PM
  #14  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
1 quick_hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 698
1 quick_hatch street rep is low. keep going
was the cobalt ss a supercharged or the regular ss? cause if it was the ss supercharged u probably would have lost. just saying though.
1 quick_hatch is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 04:11 PM
  #15  
~~ Hardcore Newb ~~
 
1 quick_hatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 14
Rep Power: 698
1 quick_hatch street rep is low. keep going
also don't forget you are also swapped and the cobalt is stock. and you weigh a hell of alot less than the cobalt does. If the cobalt weighed the same as your car you would have lost hands down. also race from a second gear roll and you will see the ouitcome would have been alot different.

Last edited by 1 quick_hatch; 04-13-2006 at 04:16 PM.
1 quick_hatch is offline  


Quick Reply: The Cobalt SS is no more...



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:17 PM.

Page generated in 0.22264 seconds with 24 queries