Who Would Win: 95 Si coupe vs. 95 Z24... opinions anyone
#46
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
GM
TOYOTA
and many more offer that program.. So now your saying all honda techs are level entry apprentcship workers? kid have you even set foot in a garage before?
TOYOTA
and many more offer that program.. So now your saying all honda techs are level entry apprentcship workers? kid have you even set foot in a garage before?
#47
Originally Posted by Honda Tech
Ok, what do you suggest comparing, maybe some 14 sec. cars for you, like the Nissan 350Z Vs S2000???
#49
Originally Posted by Premium Dude
As for performance, well, I like to think there is more to it then two numbers. A GREAT car to me is one that is fast, but nimble. If all you care about is acceleration, then by all means, go drag race. But thats for pussies who cant drive.
"Drag Racing is for fast cars, auto-x is for fast drivers" Yeah, eat a dick.
#50
Originally Posted by StealthZ
kinda sad that to you imports as a whole is all about a civic hatch. a civic hatch is the last car id get.
funny how all the domestic (ie jbody) haters have a story about a "friend" with a cav and problems. ive had mine coming up on 3 yrs, no prob. i know people who have cavs, no probs. maybe ur "friend" treats it like and doesnt deserve to own a car.
funny how all the domestic (ie jbody) haters have a story about a "friend" with a cav and problems. ive had mine coming up on 3 yrs, no prob. i know people who have cavs, no probs. maybe ur "friend" treats it like and doesnt deserve to own a car.
Ok, fine, you didnt like my example with the cavalier. Once again I chose this car because it was being talked about. I could have chosen my friend with a probe whose engine died on the highway. Damage was beyond rapair.
So my experience with domestics has never been great. Hence why I drive an import.
#51
Originally Posted by B6T
I'm so tired of hearing people say this. If you think drag racing doesn't take any skill, you either suck at it, or you haven't tried it. Don't get me wrong, circuit racing is awesome, but just because you prefer to take turns rather then go in a line doesn't make you better then everyone else, and make peole who drag a . I'm so sick and tired of the mentality that these auto-x/road course guys have where they think they're superior to everyone else because they choose handling over acceleration.
"Drag Racing is for fast cars, auto-x is for fast drivers" Yeah, eat a dick.
"Drag Racing is for fast cars, auto-x is for fast drivers" Yeah, eat a dick.
nice!
There are many examples of this. Like when you see two completely stock cars running in the 1/4 one runs a 19sec 1/4 and the other runs a 16. It does take skill to drag.
#52
Originally Posted by Nastyzed
do you work at a honda dealer to back that up? If so PM I know a mechanic thats has worked at honda in the GTA for years you may know him. He does a hell of alote more then maintence work ESP on the newer hondas.
#53
Originally Posted by StealthZ
well you're better off comparing the sir to the z24, and the 2.2l cav to the si.
so I was, in the begining, trying to be fair with this comparison, which has got alot off votes for both sides, so I think it is a fair comparison. thanks so for me, opinions lead to a tie between the cars as many people posted, meaning its coming down to drivers. comparison completed thanks.
#54
Originally Posted by Honda Tech
ok, we have already gone over this, your 2.2l is slower than my cat, and the Sir would rock any abortion gm put out on the market and called a cavalier.
so I was, in the begining, trying to be fair with this comparison, which has got alot off votes for both sides, so I think it is a fair comparison. thanks so for me, opinions lead to a tie between the cars as many people posted, meaning its coming down to drivers. comparison completed thanks.
so I was, in the begining, trying to be fair with this comparison, which has got alot off votes for both sides, so I think it is a fair comparison. thanks so for me, opinions lead to a tie between the cars as many people posted, meaning its coming down to drivers. comparison completed thanks.
first the si is a piece of , but no one admits it, and a 2.2 will hang with it. and second, id put my car against an sir (and have) just to prove you wrong.
#55
so how do you think a 2.2l pushrod cav with a pwr to wght ratio of 21.81 lbs per hp can keep up with and Si that has 5 more hp and a pwr to wght ratio of 17.85 lbs per hp.
we talked about this on page 2 of this thread. so one again.
oh and nice pics of your car. Lmao...
also... what does it matter that u put your car up agaist an Sir, you didn't say who won, or prove u won, so how did you prove me wrong? just wondering.....
we talked about this on page 2 of this thread. so one again.
oh and nice pics of your car. Lmao...
also... what does it matter that u put your car up agaist an Sir, you didn't say who won, or prove u won, so how did you prove me wrong? just wondering.....
#58
Originally Posted by Honda Tech
also... what does it matter that u put your car up agaist an Sir, you didn't say who won, or prove u won, so how did you prove me wrong? just wondering.....
#59
Originally Posted by BrowNKiD
wow this thread is gay... does anyone really care about these 17sec cars?
i dont know how "fast" your car is now, but if its a 14, 13 or 12 sec car...im sure it came from the factory like that.
#60
You can really prove anything around here.. Nobody drives around filming races we just have to take each others word for it. Honda tech get over it and stop putting civics up on a high platform. You abviously havent driven many cars because you talk about civics like there bentleys.. So just do us all a favor and shut the up.