We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
#166
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"NeedforSwede2" <carl.robson@bouncing-czechs.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.1eb1a9d476b3b98989d01@news.individual.net ...
> In article <VzC1g.9168$i41.9016@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com says...
>> No, I live about 30 km from school. I take a diesel-electric train to the
>> train terminal, then two electric subway trains. Most of my students
>> either
>> walk, take a diesel bus or the subway there.
>>
> And that electric is probably oil generated, and diesel is just another
> fuel oil produced from crude.
Yet, I use considerably less energy and produce less pollution than if I
drove into school.
Jeff
> --
> Carl Robson
> Car PC Build starts again. http://smallr.com/rz
> Homepage: http://www.bouncing-czechs.com
#167
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
produce one barrel of gasoline?
You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small fraction
of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with reality.
Perhaps this is another.
Jeff
> mike hunt
>
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:akJ1g.6314$Es3.33@newsread3.news.atl.earthlin k.net...
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>>
>>> According the DOE, almost half of the crude oil is refined into
>>> gasoline,
>>> hardly "only a small part."
>
>
#168
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
produce one barrel of gasoline?
You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small fraction
of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with reality.
Perhaps this is another.
Jeff
> mike hunt
>
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:akJ1g.6314$Es3.33@newsread3.news.atl.earthlin k.net...
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>>
>>> According the DOE, almost half of the crude oil is refined into
>>> gasoline,
>>> hardly "only a small part."
>
>
#169
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
produce one barrel of gasoline?
You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small fraction
of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with reality.
Perhaps this is another.
Jeff
> mike hunt
>
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:akJ1g.6314$Es3.33@newsread3.news.atl.earthlin k.net...
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>>
>>> According the DOE, almost half of the crude oil is refined into
>>> gasoline,
>>> hardly "only a small part."
>
>
#170
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I don't do home work for my grandchildren, what makes you believe I would do
yours? You are free to believe whatever you choose. You need not do a
search to learn the fasts to do so.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5bO1g.6373$Es3.5816@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
>> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
>> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
>
> Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
> produce one barrel of gasoline?
>
> You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small
> fraction of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with
> reality. Perhaps this is another.
>
> Jeff
>
yours? You are free to believe whatever you choose. You need not do a
search to learn the fasts to do so.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5bO1g.6373$Es3.5816@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
>> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
>> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
>
> Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
> produce one barrel of gasoline?
>
> You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small
> fraction of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with
> reality. Perhaps this is another.
>
> Jeff
>
#171
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I don't do home work for my grandchildren, what makes you believe I would do
yours? You are free to believe whatever you choose. You need not do a
search to learn the fasts to do so.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5bO1g.6373$Es3.5816@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
>> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
>> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
>
> Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
> produce one barrel of gasoline?
>
> You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small
> fraction of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with
> reality. Perhaps this is another.
>
> Jeff
>
yours? You are free to believe whatever you choose. You need not do a
search to learn the fasts to do so.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5bO1g.6373$Es3.5816@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
>> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
>> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
>
> Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
> produce one barrel of gasoline?
>
> You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small
> fraction of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with
> reality. Perhaps this is another.
>
> Jeff
>
#172
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I don't do home work for my grandchildren, what makes you believe I would do
yours? You are free to believe whatever you choose. You need not do a
search to learn the fasts to do so.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5bO1g.6373$Es3.5816@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
>> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
>> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
>
> Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
> produce one barrel of gasoline?
>
> You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small
> fraction of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with
> reality. Perhaps this is another.
>
> Jeff
>
yours? You are free to believe whatever you choose. You need not do a
search to learn the fasts to do so.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:5bO1g.6373$Es3.5816@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:XRydnX6uBsboP9rZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of
>> gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining process and would
>> need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
>
> Could you please provide evidence that it takes four barrels of oil to
> produce one barrel of gasoline?
>
> You keep coming up with "facts" like the one about how only a small
> fraction of crude oil is converted to gasoline that don't seem to fit with
> reality. Perhaps this is another.
>
> Jeff
>
#173
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I'm sorry that logic escapes you but if you really want to know, you are
free to do your own search to find what I found.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:T7O1g.6371$Es3.782@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qxSdnSZaXJJwONrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Think about it. If one can not pump any more gasoline through the
>> distribution system because the demand is cut in half, one does not have
>> any tanks left to store the gasoline, that comes out of a barrel of oil
>> before one get to the really profitable carbon products, what do you
>> think they will have to do with the gasoline?
>
> I didn't ask you to think about it. I asked for evidence.
>
> Jeff
>
>> mike hunt
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>
>>>> If every
>>>> vehicle in the US miraculously got twice as many miles per gallon some
>>>> day
>>>> we would still need crude for it carbon stocks and the excess gasoline
>>>> would simply be burned off at the refineries, as it was before it
>>>> became a
>>>> motor fuel.
>>>
>>> Please give us evidence that excess gasoline would just be burned off.
>>>
>>> I mean, before it became a motor fuel? That was when? In 1896?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
free to do your own search to find what I found.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:T7O1g.6371$Es3.782@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qxSdnSZaXJJwONrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Think about it. If one can not pump any more gasoline through the
>> distribution system because the demand is cut in half, one does not have
>> any tanks left to store the gasoline, that comes out of a barrel of oil
>> before one get to the really profitable carbon products, what do you
>> think they will have to do with the gasoline?
>
> I didn't ask you to think about it. I asked for evidence.
>
> Jeff
>
>> mike hunt
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>
>>>> If every
>>>> vehicle in the US miraculously got twice as many miles per gallon some
>>>> day
>>>> we would still need crude for it carbon stocks and the excess gasoline
>>>> would simply be burned off at the refineries, as it was before it
>>>> became a
>>>> motor fuel.
>>>
>>> Please give us evidence that excess gasoline would just be burned off.
>>>
>>> I mean, before it became a motor fuel? That was when? In 1896?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#174
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I'm sorry that logic escapes you but if you really want to know, you are
free to do your own search to find what I found.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:T7O1g.6371$Es3.782@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qxSdnSZaXJJwONrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Think about it. If one can not pump any more gasoline through the
>> distribution system because the demand is cut in half, one does not have
>> any tanks left to store the gasoline, that comes out of a barrel of oil
>> before one get to the really profitable carbon products, what do you
>> think they will have to do with the gasoline?
>
> I didn't ask you to think about it. I asked for evidence.
>
> Jeff
>
>> mike hunt
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>
>>>> If every
>>>> vehicle in the US miraculously got twice as many miles per gallon some
>>>> day
>>>> we would still need crude for it carbon stocks and the excess gasoline
>>>> would simply be burned off at the refineries, as it was before it
>>>> became a
>>>> motor fuel.
>>>
>>> Please give us evidence that excess gasoline would just be burned off.
>>>
>>> I mean, before it became a motor fuel? That was when? In 1896?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
free to do your own search to find what I found.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:T7O1g.6371$Es3.782@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qxSdnSZaXJJwONrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Think about it. If one can not pump any more gasoline through the
>> distribution system because the demand is cut in half, one does not have
>> any tanks left to store the gasoline, that comes out of a barrel of oil
>> before one get to the really profitable carbon products, what do you
>> think they will have to do with the gasoline?
>
> I didn't ask you to think about it. I asked for evidence.
>
> Jeff
>
>> mike hunt
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>
>>>> If every
>>>> vehicle in the US miraculously got twice as many miles per gallon some
>>>> day
>>>> we would still need crude for it carbon stocks and the excess gasoline
>>>> would simply be burned off at the refineries, as it was before it
>>>> became a
>>>> motor fuel.
>>>
>>> Please give us evidence that excess gasoline would just be burned off.
>>>
>>> I mean, before it became a motor fuel? That was when? In 1896?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#175
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I'm sorry that logic escapes you but if you really want to know, you are
free to do your own search to find what I found.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:T7O1g.6371$Es3.782@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qxSdnSZaXJJwONrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Think about it. If one can not pump any more gasoline through the
>> distribution system because the demand is cut in half, one does not have
>> any tanks left to store the gasoline, that comes out of a barrel of oil
>> before one get to the really profitable carbon products, what do you
>> think they will have to do with the gasoline?
>
> I didn't ask you to think about it. I asked for evidence.
>
> Jeff
>
>> mike hunt
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>
>>>> If every
>>>> vehicle in the US miraculously got twice as many miles per gallon some
>>>> day
>>>> we would still need crude for it carbon stocks and the excess gasoline
>>>> would simply be burned off at the refineries, as it was before it
>>>> became a
>>>> motor fuel.
>>>
>>> Please give us evidence that excess gasoline would just be burned off.
>>>
>>> I mean, before it became a motor fuel? That was when? In 1896?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
free to do your own search to find what I found.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:T7O1g.6371$Es3.782@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:qxSdnSZaXJJwONrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Think about it. If one can not pump any more gasoline through the
>> distribution system because the demand is cut in half, one does not have
>> any tanks left to store the gasoline, that comes out of a barrel of oil
>> before one get to the really profitable carbon products, what do you
>> think they will have to do with the gasoline?
>
> I didn't ask you to think about it. I asked for evidence.
>
> Jeff
>
>> mike hunt
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:4yC1g.9166$i41.2725@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>
>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>> newsSadnXMgH7CpW9vZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>> That is a good idea, the only problem is it will not solve the problem.
>>>> It will reduce the INCREASE in the amount of oil we import but not our
>>>> need for the fast amounts of crude we use to fuel the various economies
>>>> of
>>>> the world. Gasoline is only a small part of why we need to import
>>>> crude.
>>
>>>> If every
>>>> vehicle in the US miraculously got twice as many miles per gallon some
>>>> day
>>>> we would still need crude for it carbon stocks and the excess gasoline
>>>> would simply be burned off at the refineries, as it was before it
>>>> became a
>>>> motor fuel.
>>>
>>> Please give us evidence that excess gasoline would just be burned off.
>>>
>>> I mean, before it became a motor fuel? That was when? In 1896?
>>>
>>> Jeff
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#176
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining
> process and would need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Hmmm. Interesting claim.
4 barrels crude * $70 / barrel crude * barrel / 42 gallons = 6.67 $/gallon
And that is before any processing costs and gasoline taxes.
Another hypothesis shot down.
Lynn
> process and would need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Hmmm. Interesting claim.
4 barrels crude * $70 / barrel crude * barrel / 42 gallons = 6.67 $/gallon
And that is before any processing costs and gasoline taxes.
Another hypothesis shot down.
Lynn
#177
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining
> process and would need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Hmmm. Interesting claim.
4 barrels crude * $70 / barrel crude * barrel / 42 gallons = 6.67 $/gallon
And that is before any processing costs and gasoline taxes.
Another hypothesis shot down.
Lynn
> process and would need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Hmmm. Interesting claim.
4 barrels crude * $70 / barrel crude * barrel / 42 gallons = 6.67 $/gallon
And that is before any processing costs and gasoline taxes.
Another hypothesis shot down.
Lynn
#178
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
> That makes since it take four barrels of crude to produce one barrel of gasoline, but it is still a byproduct of the refining
> process and would need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Hmmm. Interesting claim.
4 barrels crude * $70 / barrel crude * barrel / 42 gallons = 6.67 $/gallon
And that is before any processing costs and gasoline taxes.
Another hypothesis shot down.
Lynn
> process and would need to be burned off at the refinery is not consumed..
Hmmm. Interesting claim.
4 barrels crude * $70 / barrel crude * barrel / 42 gallons = 6.67 $/gallon
And that is before any processing costs and gasoline taxes.
Another hypothesis shot down.
Lynn
#179
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Backyard Mechanic" <pettyfog@yaywho.com> wrote in message
>
> > Ditto the health care system.
> >
>
> Want to run that by, again? Read much?
What do you want me to read..I lived there.
What YOU read in the USA is a bit suspect.
#180
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Backyard Mechanic" <pettyfog@yaywho.com> wrote in message
>
> > Ditto the health care system.
> >
>
> Want to run that by, again? Read much?
What do you want me to read..I lived there.
What YOU read in the USA is a bit suspect.