We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
#316
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The are Buildlng a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant in PA
Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
think that you would see this message..
Gerald
up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
think that you would see this message..
Gerald
#317
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The are Buildlng a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant in PA
Gerald my friend don't you recognized when sombodys chain is being pulled?
mike hunt
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
>
mike hunt
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
>
#318
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The are Buildlng a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant in PA
Gerald my friend don't you recognized when sombodys chain is being pulled?
mike hunt
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
>
mike hunt
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
>
#319
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The are Buildlng a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant in PA
Gerald my friend don't you recognized when sombodys chain is being pulled?
mike hunt
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
>
mike hunt
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
>
#320
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The are Buildlng a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant in PA
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
Then, ignore the thread.
Bye.
Jeff
#321
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The are Buildlng a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant in PA
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
Then, ignore the thread.
Bye.
Jeff
#322
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: The are Buildlng a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant in PA
"gerald2003r" <gerald2003r@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1145789780.274857.76890@g10g2000cwb.googlegro ups.com...
> Jeff, you and Mike are bad readers,,, Or are a bad study,,, Give it
> up... You have both taken it beyond your means... Wasting everyone time
> if you cannot respond to others... Have a good day, not that I would
> think that you would see this message..
>
> Gerald
Then, ignore the thread.
Bye.
Jeff
#323
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it.
> I merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
> the source for what I posted
What specific claim did I not back?
Jeff
>
> mike hunt
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>
> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>
>> Jeff
>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:v3g2g.7015$Es3.386@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4LqdnQTHhLeOa9XZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>>>I guess we can assume you did not find a source to support you
>>>>>contention?
>>>>
>>>> It is your contention that needs supporting. Yet you fail to do so.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>>
>>>>> mike hunt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7CY1g.6575$Es3.2294@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:sDydnYSWAdwOKdrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>>>>> I'm sorry that logic escapes you but if you really want to know, you
>>>>>>> are free to do your own search to find what I found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In other words, you are unwilling or unable to back your words.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#324
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it.
> I merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
> the source for what I posted
What specific claim did I not back?
Jeff
>
> mike hunt
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>
> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>
>> Jeff
>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:v3g2g.7015$Es3.386@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4LqdnQTHhLeOa9XZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>>>I guess we can assume you did not find a source to support you
>>>>>contention?
>>>>
>>>> It is your contention that needs supporting. Yet you fail to do so.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>>
>>>>> mike hunt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7CY1g.6575$Es3.2294@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:sDydnYSWAdwOKdrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>>>>> I'm sorry that logic escapes you but if you really want to know, you
>>>>>>> are free to do your own search to find what I found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In other words, you are unwilling or unable to back your words.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#325
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it.
> I merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
> the source for what I posted
What specific claim did I not back?
Jeff
>
> mike hunt
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>
> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>
>> Jeff
>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>>
>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:v3g2g.7015$Es3.386@newsread3.news.atl.earthli nk.net...
>>>>
>>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:4LqdnQTHhLeOa9XZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>>>I guess we can assume you did not find a source to support you
>>>>>contention?
>>>>
>>>> It is your contention that needs supporting. Yet you fail to do so.
>>>>
>>>> Jeff
>>>>
>>>>> mike hunt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:7CY1g.6575$Es3.2294@newsread3.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:sDydnYSWAdwOKdrZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>>>>>> I'm sorry that logic escapes you but if you really want to know, you
>>>>>>> are free to do your own search to find what I found.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In other words, you are unwilling or unable to back your words.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
#326
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
information that shows the other person is incorrect.
Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
each of them.
Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
> mike hunt
Jeff
>
>> Mike Hunter <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:m9ycnY3jDKOSwNTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> I'll bet you are not a chemist but if you can figure out way to refine
>>> crude
>>> to get to the carbon stock, without producing gasoline or other
>>> volatiles,
>>> I'm sure the oil companies will pay you an awful lot of money to know
>>> how
>>> you could do it. LOL
>>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>>
>> No, Mike. True, you can't "refine" it directly, but they already know how
>> to
>> make what they need from the refined fractions. Your failure to
>> acknowledge that
>> makes you either extremely ignorant, or a troll.
>>
>>
>
>
#327
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
information that shows the other person is incorrect.
Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
each of them.
Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
> mike hunt
Jeff
>
>> Mike Hunter <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:m9ycnY3jDKOSwNTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> I'll bet you are not a chemist but if you can figure out way to refine
>>> crude
>>> to get to the carbon stock, without producing gasoline or other
>>> volatiles,
>>> I'm sure the oil companies will pay you an awful lot of money to know
>>> how
>>> you could do it. LOL
>>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>>
>> No, Mike. True, you can't "refine" it directly, but they already know how
>> to
>> make what they need from the refined fractions. Your failure to
>> acknowledge that
>> makes you either extremely ignorant, or a troll.
>>
>>
>
>
#328
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
information that shows the other person is incorrect.
Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
each of them.
Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
> mike hunt
Jeff
>
>> Mike Hunter <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:m9ycnY3jDKOSwNTZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> I'll bet you are not a chemist but if you can figure out way to refine
>>> crude
>>> to get to the carbon stock, without producing gasoline or other
>>> volatiles,
>>> I'm sure the oil companies will pay you an awful lot of money to know
>>> how
>>> you could do it. LOL
>>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>>
>> No, Mike. True, you can't "refine" it directly, but they already know how
>> to
>> make what they need from the refined fractions. Your failure to
>> acknowledge that
>> makes you either extremely ignorant, or a troll.
>>
>>
>
>
#329
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Now we are getting to the crux of the problem, I never said 'oil companies
have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a tax
credit as a capital loss
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they
>> can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
..
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
>> mike hunt
>
> Jeff
>
have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a tax
credit as a capital loss
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they
>> can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
..
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
>> mike hunt
>
> Jeff
>
#330
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Now we are getting to the crux of the problem, I never said 'oil companies
have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a tax
credit as a capital loss
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they
>> can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
..
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
>> mike hunt
>
> Jeff
>
have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a tax
credit as a capital loss
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they
>> can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
..
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
>> mike hunt
>
> Jeff
>