We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
#331
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
Now we are getting to the crux of the problem, I never said 'oil companies
have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a tax
credit as a capital loss
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they
>> can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
..
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
>> mike hunt
>
> Jeff
>
have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a tax
credit as a capital loss
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they
>> can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
..
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
>> mike hunt
>
> Jeff
>
#332
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted I
can understand why you can not prove what you said.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it. I
>> merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
>> the source for what I posted
>
> What specific claim did I not back?
>
> Jeff
>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>
>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>
>>>> mike hunt
>>>>
>>>>
can understand why you can not prove what you said.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it. I
>> merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
>> the source for what I posted
>
> What specific claim did I not back?
>
> Jeff
>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>
>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>
>>>> mike hunt
>>>>
>>>>
#333
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted I
can understand why you can not prove what you said.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it. I
>> merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
>> the source for what I posted
>
> What specific claim did I not back?
>
> Jeff
>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>
>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>
>>>> mike hunt
>>>>
>>>>
can understand why you can not prove what you said.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it. I
>> merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
>> the source for what I posted
>
> What specific claim did I not back?
>
> Jeff
>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>
>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>
>>>> mike hunt
>>>>
>>>>
#334
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted I
can understand why you can not prove what you said.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it. I
>> merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
>> the source for what I posted
>
> What specific claim did I not back?
>
> Jeff
>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>
>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>
>>>> mike hunt
>>>>
>>>>
can understand why you can not prove what you said.
mike hunt
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it. I
>> merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you to
>> the source for what I posted
>
> What specific claim did I not back?
>
> Jeff
>
>>
>> mike hunt
>>
>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>
>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>
>>>> mike hunt
>>>>
>>>>
#335
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>
> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
> each of them.
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
> > mike hunt
>
> Jeff
Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
automatically top post.
My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
with every reply.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>
> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
> each of them.
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
> > mike hunt
>
> Jeff
Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
automatically top post.
My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
with every reply.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
#336
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>
> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
> each of them.
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
> > mike hunt
>
> Jeff
Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
automatically top post.
My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
with every reply.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>
> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
> each of them.
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
> > mike hunt
>
> Jeff
Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
automatically top post.
My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
with every reply.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
#337
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>
> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
> each of them.
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
> > mike hunt
>
> Jeff
Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
automatically top post.
My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
with every reply.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
"Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>
> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
> threads, ignoring particular parts of threads where you have been shown to
> be incorrect, claiming that the other people don't support their arguments
> when the other people are asked for evidence, deleting parts of a post
> without indicating that fact when those parts of the post contain the
> information that shows the other person is incorrect.
>
> Mike is an expert at all of these, so you can read his posts for examples of
> each of them.
>
> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles" in
> large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>
> > mike hunt
>
> Jeff
Why are you against top posting. Many email and newsreaders
automatically top post.
My grip is people don't clip enough. Too much crap gets dragged along
with every reply.
--
"[It's] time for the human race to enter the solar system."
-- Vice President Al Gore
#338
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:10:00 GMT, The BEnevolent dbu
<Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote:
>In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
>> threads,
>Why are you against top posting.
Because it sucks. It's not normal for discussion.
> Many email and newsreaders automatically top post.
Newsreaders? No. Outlook and web browsers? Maybe. ing
microsoft.
>My grip is people don't clip enough.
Top posters never seem to clip ANYHING.
> Too much crap gets dragged along with every reply.
Thank top posters for that.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
<Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote:
>In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
>> threads,
>Why are you against top posting.
Because it sucks. It's not normal for discussion.
> Many email and newsreaders automatically top post.
Newsreaders? No. Outlook and web browsers? Maybe. ing
microsoft.
>My grip is people don't clip enough.
Top posters never seem to clip ANYHING.
> Too much crap gets dragged along with every reply.
Thank top posters for that.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
#339
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:10:00 GMT, The BEnevolent dbu
<Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote:
>In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
>> threads,
>Why are you against top posting.
Because it sucks. It's not normal for discussion.
> Many email and newsreaders automatically top post.
Newsreaders? No. Outlook and web browsers? Maybe. ing
microsoft.
>My grip is people don't clip enough.
Top posters never seem to clip ANYHING.
> Too much crap gets dragged along with every reply.
Thank top posters for that.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
<Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote:
>In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
>> threads,
>Why are you against top posting.
Because it sucks. It's not normal for discussion.
> Many email and newsreaders automatically top post.
Newsreaders? No. Outlook and web browsers? Maybe. ing
microsoft.
>My grip is people don't clip enough.
Top posters never seem to clip ANYHING.
> Too much crap gets dragged along with every reply.
Thank top posters for that.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
#340
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 21:10:00 GMT, The BEnevolent dbu
<Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote:
>In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
>> threads,
>Why are you against top posting.
Because it sucks. It's not normal for discussion.
> Many email and newsreaders automatically top post.
Newsreaders? No. Outlook and web browsers? Maybe. ing
microsoft.
>My grip is people don't clip enough.
Top posters never seem to clip ANYHING.
> Too much crap gets dragged along with every reply.
Thank top posters for that.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
<Relaxand@smeltherose.comm> wrote:
>In article <tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>> > You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments to
>> > support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I certainly
>> > am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to the carbon
>> > stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If they can not
>> > sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
>> Other tactics you might try include top-posting, to make it harder to follow
>> threads,
>Why are you against top posting.
Because it sucks. It's not normal for discussion.
> Many email and newsreaders automatically top post.
Newsreaders? No. Outlook and web browsers? Maybe. ing
microsoft.
>My grip is people don't clip enough.
Top posters never seem to clip ANYHING.
> Too much crap gets dragged along with every reply.
Thank top posters for that.
--
gburnore at DataBasix dot Com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
How you look depends on where you go.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary L. Burnore | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
Official .sig, Accept no substitutes. | ÝÛ³ºÝ³Þ³ºÝ³³Ýۺݳ޳ºÝ³Ý³Þ³ºÝ³ÝÝÛ³
| ÝÛ 0 1 7 2 3 / Ý³Þ 3 7 4 9 3 0 Û³
Black Helicopter Repair Services, Ltd.| Official Proof of Purchase
================================================== =========================
#341
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:e-mcnRfcVpVCRdbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted
>I can understand why you can not prove what you said.
There you go again. You said that I did not back a claim. I asked which one,
and now you are unable to back YOUR claim.
Jeff
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it.
>>> I merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you
>>> to the source for what I posted
>>
>> What specific claim did I not back?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>>
>>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>>
>>>>> mike hunt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
#342
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:e-mcnRfcVpVCRdbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted
>I can understand why you can not prove what you said.
There you go again. You said that I did not back a claim. I asked which one,
and now you are unable to back YOUR claim.
Jeff
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it.
>>> I merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you
>>> to the source for what I posted
>>
>> What specific claim did I not back?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>>
>>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>>
>>>>> mike hunt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
#343
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:e-mcnRfcVpVCRdbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>I can see why you are in a quandary, if you can't remember what you posted
>I can understand why you can not prove what you said.
There you go again. You said that I did not back a claim. I asked which one,
and now you are unable to back YOUR claim.
Jeff
> mike hunt
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:4cQ2g.8102$sq5.3366@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:MGCdneSQzNTuFNfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> Precisely the point, you made a claim, I'm only asking you to prove it.
>>> I merely quoted something I read, I made no claim. I even directed you
>>> to the source for what I posted
>>
>> What specific claim did I not back?
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>>>
>>> mike hunt
>>>
>>> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:dap2g.11246$i41.7563@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
>>>>
>>> . When you make a claim, it is up to you to support your claim.
>>>
>>>>> mike hunt
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>
#344
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:fu6cnV00V4RgStbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Now we are getting to the crux of the problem, I never said 'oil companies
> have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
> to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
> What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
> not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a
> tax credit as a capital loss
Please demonstrate that the oil companies have burned off gasoline and
claimed it as a capital loss, then.
Jeff
>
> mike hunt
>
>
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If
>>> they can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
> .
>>
>> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles"
>> in large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>>
>>> mike hunt
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>
>
#345
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: We Could Build a Coal-to-Gasoline Conversion Plant
"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:fu6cnV00V4RgStbZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
> Now we are getting to the crux of the problem, I never said 'oil companies
> have burned off "volatiles" in large quantities
> to get rid of them in recent years.' No wonder you can not prove that it.
> What I have been saying all along is what I said in my post. If they can
> not store gasoline or sell it a profit they will burn it off and take a
> tax credit as a capital loss
Please demonstrate that the oil companies have burned off gasoline and
claimed it as a capital loss, then.
Jeff
>
> mike hunt
>
>
>
>
> "Jeff" <kidsdoc2000@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:tfQ2g.8103$sq5.2986@newsread2.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>> news:dZ-cnf7WOZlpFtfZUSdV9g@ptd.net...
>>> You can resort to calling me names if you are running out of arguments
>>> to support you position if you chose, I could not care less, but I
>>> certainly am not ignorant of the fact one can not refine crude to get to
>>> the carbon stock without producing gasoline or other volatiles. If
>>> they can not sell or store them, they will need to be burned off
>>
> .
>>
>> Please provide evidence that oil companies have burned off "volatiles"
>> in large quantities to get rid of them in recent years.
>>
>>> mike hunt
>>
>> Jeff
>>
>
>